topcat(The most tip top) Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 No, I think you are getting perfect information confused with perfect competition. Which requires... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 They also tend to assume rationality as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 9 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: They also tend to assume rationality as well No, I think you mean complete information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 No, I think you mean complete information. No I mean rationality It's why the most interesting new work in Economics is in Behavioural economic abandoning the concept of homo economicus Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 2 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: No I mean rationality Aye, when you get all your complete's and perfects in the right order you will have common knowledge, and then you can go to bed for a good nights sleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silvio Tattiescone Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 5 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: Educated son of a knight and minor land owner. He was sufficiently posh to have had someone else to do the tilling of the soil while he got involved in politics and hitting people with swords Aw haud the bus here, are you saying Wallace was a Tory? This changes a'hing man, a'hing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted November 29, 2016 Share Posted November 29, 2016 Aw haud the bus here, are you saying Wallace was a Tory? This changes a'hing man, a'hing. Well he wasn't as posh as Tony BennDoes that help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Socialism allows people to fulfil their potential regardless of what their parents did for a living or what area they come from, while also providing support and care if things go tits up (whether it's your own fault or due to events beyond your control).I'm with Socialism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badgerthewitness Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Individualism with a social conscience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 f**k sake first Kate Bush and now William Wallace? Can't trust anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KiwiDB Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 As with anything in life, my view is the truth is somewhere in the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todders Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 I believe everybody should have the same opportunites in life. What one makes of these opportumities is down to the individual.I guess that makes me a "socialist ". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrcat1990 Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 Economic stability, interest rates, growth. It's not all a conspiracy to keep you in little boxes, alright? It's only the miracle of consumer capitalism that means you're not lying in your own shit, dying at 43 with rotten teeth. And a little pill with a chicken on it is not going to change that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 7 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said: Socialism allows people to fulfil their potential regardless of what their parents did for a living or what area they come from, while also providing support and care if things go tits up (whether it's your own fault or due to events beyond your control). I'm with Socialism. I take it you are in China or Cuba then. If not I'm sure they would welcome you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thisal Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 I'm quite happy with both. Has any country ever had one without the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat(The most tip top) Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 7 minutes ago, thisal said: I'm quite happy with both. Has any country ever had one without the other? That's one of those "Depends exactly what you take those terms to mean" questions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poo Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 6 hours ago, hehawhehaw said: I take it you are in China or Cuba then. If not I'm sure they would welcome you. ^^^ Doesn't know the difference between Socialism and Communism ^^^ It's like saying Capitalism is the same thing as Fascism. Btw, I don't think China can really be considered a communist nation anymore. It has opened itself up to the word and corporatism in a huge way over the last couple of decades. Does their government still spy on them? Absolutely. Although probably no more or less than governments of the western world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hehawhehaw Posted November 30, 2016 Share Posted November 30, 2016 3 hours ago, Poo said: ^^^ Doesn't know the difference between Socialism and Communism ^^^ It's like saying Capitalism is the same thing as Fascism. Btw, I don't think China can really be considered a communist nation anymore. It has opened itself up to the word and corporatism in a huge way over the last couple of decades. Does their government still spy on them? Absolutely. Although probably no more or less than governments of the western world. How good is that^^^ Not very Been keeping your head low for a wee while poo. We both know why. You do realise that fascism was a leftist construct. Mussolini was the father of fascism, and a renowned socialist. So was Hitler. They all followed on from Sorel, Robespierre and Rousseau Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McSpreader Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 On 30/11/2016 at 00:18, Bully Wee Villa said: Socialism allows people to fulfil their potential regardless of what their parents did for a living or what area they come from, while also providing support and care if things go tits up (whether it's your own fault or due to events beyond your control). I'm with Socialism. In theory, yes. In practice??? Cronyism, oppression, suppression, corruption, economic stagnation, isolation, hunger..... War. Cuba's ruling elite was lucky it was an island, it was like a prison to the people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Feel free to list all the lovely capitalist countries in Central America/the Caribbean. It was a Mafia-run shithole before Castro took over. It could have been better... and certainly would've been had America not acted like little birches and blocked off their main trade outlet. Communism was, undoubtedly, a success story for Cuba. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.