vikingTON Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 (edited) 5 hours ago, Salt n Vinegar said: Demonstrable benefit? Well I suppose if you discount a country-wide general improvement in fire safety regulations, removing the consequences of failure to replace batteries, all alarms going off at the same time, probable earlier detection and resulting less damage and more importantly fewer fatalities then you would think there were no benefits. I'm not discounting these benefits - I'm asking you to put an actual, tangible and realistic value on them. How many fatalities will be avoided each year? What is the sum total of these benefits in real money terms? Spoiler Because some people will still die in house fires regardless. Once we have that figure, we can make a rational comparison with the costs. Which will allow us to determine whether a legally binding government mandate is really the most effective and proportionate response to your sudden concern about house fires (which emerged, as soon as the SG decided that for you). Edited February 9, 2022 by vikingTON 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 Does it effect your home insurance? Because if it does the main impact will be fewer people getting payouts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurkst Posted February 9, 2022 Share Posted February 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Detournement said: Does it effect your home insurance? Because if it does the main impact will be fewer people getting payouts. From what I've seen insurers have said payouts won't be impacted by adherence to the new regulations.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. Her response: "I'm not against it". Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TONTROOPER Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Detournement said: Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. Her response: "I'm not against it". Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. '...... said the bitter together sycophant. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 (edited) 3 hours ago, Detournement said: Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. Her response: "I'm not against it". Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. Didn’t you say were “glad” Brexit had happened after it became clear the capitalist Tories were in charge of it? Edited February 10, 2022 by Antlion 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonapersona Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 3 hours ago, Detournement said: Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. Her response: "I'm not against it". Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. Hold on. Aren't you a tory? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 4 minutes ago, Anonapersona said: Hold on. Aren't you a tory? Wash your mouth out! He’s one of those socialists who just happens to support Tory policy and attack all other wicked neoliberals, and whose heart was gladdened when those socialist paragons Boris and JRM began to roll out Brexit (thereby establishing a socialist future away from that wicked capitalist EU). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 1 hour ago, Antlion said: Wash your mouth out! He’s one of those socialists who just happens to support Tory policy Which ones? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 25 minutes ago, Detournement said: Which ones? Priti's hostile environment for asylum seekers and revoking people's passports when they go on holiday to start with. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anonapersona Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 32 minutes ago, Detournement said: Which ones? The capitalist ones. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. Her response: "I'm not against it". Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. Rather than selecting parts of her quote, why not mention all of it. Where she stated that all companies who have, or are, profiting excessively from the pandemic or increased energy prices should contribute. There would of course be an option if, after independence,she did turn out to be some sort of Thatcher in disguise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 It probably doesn’t to be honest 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 H_B 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 10, 2022 Share Posted February 10, 2022 18 minutes ago, Clown Job said: It probably doesn’t to be honest A politician saying "merits further consideration" is usually code for "aye, like that's going to happen" tbf. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenneth840 Posted February 12, 2022 Share Posted February 12, 2022 (edited) On 09/02/2022 at 00:02, Glen Sannox said: Absolutely Dawson, the left normally love emptying prisons and defending “wrong uns”. The cynic in me would suggest that this McDermid bloke/woman must be a member of the “civic and joyous SNP cult”, hence the outrage from Sturgeon. Not a peep from Sturgeon re Goodwillie’s previous 4/5 seasons at Clyde. Selective outrage. On 09/02/2022 at 08:08, Billy Jean King said: "this McDermid bloke/woman" Seriously get so far to f**k with that shite. That should be enough to get someone emptied from this or any other site you utter cretin. Just crawl back under the rock in your cave and stay there. Have to defend Glen sannox here. Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman? Another self id bonus. Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow. If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her? Or him? Edited February 12, 2022 by Kenneth840 -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goomba Posted February 12, 2022 Share Posted February 12, 2022 Sturgeon's Goodwillie comments were disingenuous and reek of opportunism, as proven by her recent dreadful treatment of Helene Gray on twitter. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_Stewart Posted February 12, 2022 Share Posted February 12, 2022 Have to defend Glen sannox here. Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman? Another self id bonus. Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow. If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her? Or him?Kenneth, please shut the f**k up you horrible, horrible moon howling bigot. 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted February 13, 2022 Share Posted February 13, 2022 Have to defend Glen sannox here. Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman? Another self id bonus. Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow. If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her? Or him?f**k off you utter cretin. Another totally shameful, ignorant post. This place really does fester at times. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kenneth840 Posted February 19, 2022 Share Posted February 19, 2022 On 12/02/2022 at 22:08, J_Stewart said: Kenneth, please shut the f**k up you horrible, horrible moon howling bigot. On 13/02/2022 at 09:57, Billy Jean King said: On 12/02/2022 at 18:44, Kenneth840 said: f**k off you utter cretin. Another totally shameful, ignorant post. This place really does fester at times. No. It is not bigoted to have a view against yours. Even if Scotland is festering under a snp government that is gaslighting its electorate. To gaslight is to convince someone that what they know is not real. Like being forced to accept a man is a woman. When I see a man walk down the road dressed in womans clothes, am I to accept that he is a female? No that doesnt work with me, if he wants to be a woman then I guess he will complete his "trans" as in transitioning. Then i will accept he is a women. Until then no. So maybe you should eff off, and @J_Stewart too. You pair of bigoted misogynistic bigots. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.