Jump to content

Oor Nicola Sturgeon thread.


Pearbuyerbell

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

Demonstrable benefit? Well I suppose if you discount a country-wide general improvement in fire safety regulations, removing the consequences of failure to replace batteries, all alarms going off at the same time, probable earlier detection and resulting less damage and more importantly fewer fatalities then you would think there were no benefits. 

I'm not discounting these benefits - I'm asking you to put an actual, tangible and realistic value on them. How many fatalities will be avoided each year? What is the sum total of these benefits in real money terms?

Spoiler

Because some people will still die in house fires regardless. 

Once we have that figure, we can make a rational comparison with the costs. Which will allow us to determine whether a legally binding government mandate is really the most effective and proportionate response to your sudden concern about house fires (which emerged, as soon as the SG decided that for you)

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Detournement said:

Does it effect your home insurance?

Because if it does the main impact will be fewer people getting payouts.

From what I've seen insurers have said payouts won't be impacted by adherence to the new regulations....

 

the jungle book disney GIF

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Detournement said:

Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. 

Her response: "I'm not against it".

Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. 

'...... said the bitter together sycophant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Detournement said:

Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. 

Her response: "I'm not against it".

Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. 

Didn’t you say were “glad” Brexit had happened after it became clear the capitalist Tories were in charge of it?

Edited by Antlion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Detournement said:

Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. 

Her response: "I'm not against it".

Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. 

Hold on. Aren't you a tory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Anonapersona said:

Hold on. Aren't you a tory?

Wash your mouth out! He’s one of those socialists who just happens to support Tory policy and attack all other wicked neoliberals, and whose heart was gladdened when those socialist paragons Boris and JRM began to roll out Brexit (thereby establishing a socialist future away from that wicked capitalist EU).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neoliberal Nic was asked about a windfall tax on energy company super profits. 
Her response: "I'm not against it".
Anyone who thinks an independent Scotland set up by this woman would anything other than a capitalists' paradise is utterly deluded. 
Rather than selecting parts of her quote, why not mention all of it. Where she stated that all companies who have, or are, profiting excessively from the pandemic or increased energy prices should contribute.
There would of course be an option if, after independence,she did turn out to be some sort of Thatcher in disguise.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 09/02/2022 at 00:02, Glen Sannox said:

Absolutely Dawson, the left normally love emptying prisons and defending “wrong uns”.  The cynic in me would suggest that this McDermid bloke/woman must be a member of the “civic and joyous SNP cult”, hence the outrage from Sturgeon. Not a peep from Sturgeon re Goodwillie’s previous 4/5 seasons at Clyde. Selective outrage.

 

On 09/02/2022 at 08:08, Billy Jean King said:


 

 


"this McDermid bloke/woman"

Seriously get so far to f**k with that shite. That should be enough to get someone emptied from this or any other site you utter cretin. Just crawl back under the rock in your cave and stay there.

 

Have to defend Glen sannox here.  Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman?

Another self id bonus.  Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow.  If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her?  

Or him?

Edited by Kenneth840
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to defend Glen sannox here.  Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman?
Another self id bonus.  Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow.  If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her?  
Or him?


Kenneth, please shut the f**k up you horrible, horrible moon howling bigot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have to defend Glen sannox here.  Assuming he doesnt know Val McDermid personally, how is he to know that she identifies as a male or female/bloke or woman?
Another self id bonus.  Cant have it both ways Billy/Jean/King/Queen/Him/Her/Guy/Gal/Lad/Lass/cock/hen/dog/bitch/bull/cow.  If he doesn't know her pronouns, how can he accurately describe her?  
Or him?
f**k off you utter cretin. Another totally shameful, ignorant post. This place really does fester at times.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/02/2022 at 22:08, J_Stewart said:

 


Kenneth, please shut the f**k up you horrible, horrible moon howling bigot.

 

 

On 13/02/2022 at 09:57, Billy Jean King said:
On 12/02/2022 at 18:44, Kenneth840 said:

 

f**k off you utter cretin. Another totally shameful, ignorant post. This place really does fester at times.

No.  It is not bigoted to have a view against yours.  Even if Scotland is festering under a snp government that is gaslighting its electorate.  To gaslight is to convince someone that what they know is not real.  Like being forced to accept a man is a woman. 

When I see a man walk down the road dressed in womans clothes, am I to accept that he is a female? No that doesnt work with me, if he wants to be a woman then I guess he will complete his "trans" as in transitioning.  Then i will accept he is a women.  Until then no. 

So maybe you should eff off, and @J_Stewart too.  You pair of bigoted misogynistic bigots. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...