Jump to content

The Celtic All Seasons thread


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said:

I'm more than happy with my conduct in calling it out for what it is. The fact you want to downplay it because either i) he plays/played for Celtic or ii) he added "when she's older" says more about you than it does me, tbh. 

I said you sensationalised it because you did. 
As to point i) - is pretty much horse shit considering I just said I wanted Griffiths gone (if the messages are true and he knew her age) a few posts back for what I consider to actually be wrong for a man of his age.

point ii - I have already said it was a bit creepy for me but Drew has pretty much explained above for me. Going out your way to try and portray someone as a predator is rather disturbing behaviour.

Edited by gannonball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Alli said:

Oko Flex was telling an 8 year old was hot. 

He told a young fan when she’s older she’ll be ‘peng’, meaning hot or attractive or similar. A bit different to how you put it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Empty It said:

Is there any evidence of him chatting up a 15/16 year old or is it just what someone has said?

Twitter screen shots…

Of a Twitter handle that isn’t his.

Or Instagram whichever one it is, that was created in November and says “second official” without the verification tick. The tick just appears in the screen grabs and not in the account.

This isn’t me defending him by the way, just stating the information available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Drew Brees said:

I’m pretty sure he was sat with him mum, hosting an open fans discussion, a big difference between an 18 yr old making an ill thought out comment to a 30 yr old privately messaging a 15/16 yr old girl. 

She's not 15/16. She is 16. Is it predatory? Yes, very much so but in the eyes of the law it's perfectly legal. 

You're another who sees Oko Flex's comment less sinister than I do - and that's perfectly reasonable. My opinion is certainly Oko Flex is the one more for the criticism 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said:

She's not 15/16. She is 16. Is it predatory? Yes, very much so but in the eyes of the law it's perfectly legal

Possessing indecent images of someone under the age 18 is illegal. Asking for them is grooming at the very least. 

 

30 minutes ago, stressball said:

Twitter screen shots…

Of a Twitter handle that isn’t his.

Or Instagram whichever one it is, that was created in November and says “second official” without the verification tick. The tick just appears in the screen grabs and not in the account.

This isn’t me defending him by the way, just stating the information available.

The Instagram handle is his, and the tick does appear on the account. What are you talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LiviLion said:

Possessing indecent images of someone under the age 18 is illegal. Asking for them is grooming at the very least. 

 

The Instagram handle is his, and the tick does appear on the account. What are you talking about?

The screen grabs I saw are obviously different to the ones you’ve seen. 

The handle is different to what his official account reads, unless you can change that?

 

7D3CF363-7021-4AAB-9162-8152594B6848.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LiviLion said:

Possessing indecent images of someone under the age 18 is illegal. Asking for them is grooming at the very least. 

 

The Instagram handle is his, and the tick does appear on the account. What are you talking about?

Sorry for two posts, couldn’t get two images on the same one.

11203FEF-5F25-45B4-9D6E-926CE956EF9A.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stressball said:

The screen grabs I saw are obviously different to the ones you’ve seen. 

The handle is different to what his official account reads, unless you can change that?

 

7D3CF363-7021-4AAB-9162-8152594B6848.jpeg

I think whoever wrote that message is confused, the messages were sent on Instagram, and his display name on there is leighg09.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LiviLion said:

I think whoever wrote that message is confused, the messages were sent on Instagram, and his display name on there is leighg09.

Ahh gotcha, cheers for clearing that up. I thought it was Twitter from how I’ve seen it.

What an absolute waster of a human being.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said:

She's not 15/16. She is 16. Is it predatory? Yes, very much so but in the eyes of the law it's perfectly legal. 

You're another who sees Oko Flex's comment less sinister than I do - and that's perfectly reasonable. My opinion is certainly Oko Flex is the one more for the criticism 

Jonah Hill Reaction GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Alli said:

She's not 15/16. She is 16. Is it predatory? Yes, very much so but in the eyes of the law it's perfectly legal. 

You seem convinced she’s 16, I’ve been told otherwise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LiviLion said:

Possessing indecent images of someone under the age 18 is illegal. Asking for them is grooming at the very least. 

I've obviously seen different screen grabs than you. I've only seen one where he has 'reacted' to a photo she put up herself. 

1 hour ago, Drew Brees said:

You seem convinced she’s 16, I’ve been told otherwise.  

Again, the only thing I've seen is someone putting up screen grabs and sayings it is his cousin and she is 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Alli said:

I've obviously seen different screen grabs than you. I've only seen one where he has 'reacted' to a photo she put up herself. 

The camera emoji he sent is used when asking someone to send pictures. Hence the "Have a think and get back to me" afterwards 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any indication that Griffiths knew she was under 18?

Because if he didnt, is he really guilty of anything other than being a shitty boyfriend?

If he did know, surely the Police will get involved and Celtic will have grounds to sack him for committing a crime?

Anyone sharing those screenshots online are knowingly sharing indecent images of an underage girl just to get as a footballer, so everyone of them should be done as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...