tamthebam Posted December 22, 2022 Share Posted December 22, 2022 5 hours ago, williemillersmoustache said: Just clocked Gordy Broon lauding a Xmas food bank/Christmas packages scheme for people struggling with poverty on the news there. It might seems a little vitriolic and unkind but that old goat can take a running f**k to himself. Clapwanking Amazon giving alms to poor and the odd benevolent mince pie to people in poverty as a direct consequence of the lies he told. c**t. As Jackson Browne sang "And we give something to the poor, If the generousity seizes us, But ask why there are poor, You get the same as the rebel Jesus" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted December 23, 2022 Share Posted December 23, 2022 I can't help but maintain some residual like/respect for the GordonBroonoid. I'm not sure why. But it's sorely tested sometimes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 Who needs policies when you can have personalities backing you instead? Labour hires head of celebrity endorsements to line up big name backers ahead of the next election (inews.co.uk) And obviously a leader lacking in any kind of personality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antlion Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Suspect Device said: Who needs policies when you can have personalities backing you instead? Labour hires head of celebrity endorsements to line up big name backers ahead of the next election (inews.co.uk) And obviously a leader lacking in any kind of personality. Unfortunately Starmer doesn’t have much in the way of issues when disagreeing with the Tories either. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_Stewart Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 Am I surprised that the Shadow Secretary for Domestic Violence has little knowledge of the most prominent misogynistic “male dominance” promoting scumbag currently grifting away? No, no I’m not. Am I surprised she’s openly admitted to being clueless about something that is clearly radicalising young men and will be a root cause of current and future domestic violence? No, also not surprised. A complete moron. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkay Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 5 minutes ago, J_Stewart said: Am I surprised that the Shadow Secretary for Domestic Violence has little knowledge of the most prominent misogynistic “male dominance” promoting scumbag currently grifting away? No, no I’m not. Am I surprised she’s openly admitted to being clueless about something that is clearly radicalising young men and will be a root cause of current and future domestic violence? No, also not surprised. A complete moron. It’s the “should have got a woman in to do his rapey trafficking PR” bit that made me think. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leith Green Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 17 minutes ago, J_Stewart said: Am I surprised that the Shadow Secretary for Domestic Violence has little knowledge of the most prominent misogynistic “male dominance” promoting scumbag currently grifting away? No, no I’m not. Am I surprised she’s openly admitted to being clueless about something that is clearly radicalising young men and will be a root cause of current and future domestic violence? No, also not surprised. A complete moron. To be fair, I had never heard of the guy before today either, probably because I dont give a shite about Big Brother or perverts that live in Romania............................. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Kelly Isley III Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 2 hours ago, J_Stewart said: Am I surprised that the Shadow Secretary for Domestic Violence has little knowledge of the most prominent misogynistic “male dominance” promoting scumbag currently grifting away? No, no I’m not. Am I surprised she’s openly admitted to being clueless about something that is clearly radicalising young men and will be a root cause of current and future domestic violence? No, also not surprised. A complete moron. And she can't spell 'gist'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 3 hours ago, J_Stewart said: Am I surprised that the Shadow Secretary for Domestic Violence has little knowledge of the most prominent misogynistic “male dominance” promoting scumbag currently grifting away? No, no I’m not. Am I surprised she’s openly admitted to being clueless about something that is clearly radicalising young men and will be a root cause of current and future domestic violence? No, also not surprised. A complete moron. She’s the Labour equivalent of Liz Truss. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_Stewart Posted December 30, 2022 Share Posted December 30, 2022 4 hours ago, Melanius Mullarkay said: It’s the “should have got a woman in to do his rapey trafficking PR” bit that made me think. Yes, forgot to add the suggested girl bossing of human trafficking, coercion and sex crimes. She really is so fucking thick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingRocketman II Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 Lisa Nandy, MP for Brexit voting Wigan, dismisses the growing majority across the country - that includes Labour mayor Sadiq Khan - who are calling for the UK to rejoin the EU’s single market, as pushing a “fantasy” that “won’t take the country forward”. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btb Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 15 minutes ago, KingRocketman II said: Lisa Nandy, MP for Brexit voting Wigan, dismisses the growing majority across the country - that includes Labour mayor Sadiq Khan - who are calling for the UK to rejoin the EU’s single market, as pushing a “fantasy” that “won’t take the country forward”. How long can Labour go before they decide folks what have changed their mind since the Brexit referendum are more numerous than the Farage Ultras in the Red Wall seats who probably won't switch back to Labour anyway? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highlandmagar Posted January 2 Share Posted January 2 1 hour ago, btb said: How long can Labour go before they decide folks what have changed their mind since the Brexit referendum are more numerous than the Farage Ultras in the Red Wall seats who probably won't switch back to Labour anyway? Labour will have to start growing some political balls and not be Tories mark 2. There is still 2 years left to the next election. Any green shoots in the economy and the Tories will get their vote back. I am still convinced that Labour won't get a huge majority. At best a small difficult majority or a hung parliament. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 I'm beginning to think that a large number of Labourites were genuinely leave-inclined. They seem to have embraced Brexit with unexpected enthusiasm. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 22 minutes ago, KirkieRR said: I'm beginning to think that a large number of Labourites were genuinely leave-inclined. They seem to have embraced Brexit with unexpected enthusiasm. I suspect that a number of them are embracing it for no other reason than they would not want to be seen to be opposing the leadership at a time when they think they have a chance winning an election. To be fair I haven't noticed many folk on P&B embracing brexit whether they're allegedly Labour supporters or not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 On 02/01/2023 at 14:26, Highlandmagar said: I am still convinced that Labour won't get a huge majority. At best a small difficult majority or a hung parliament. And of course they've absolutely ruled out a coalition with the SNP, which means they will do just that in the event of a hung parliament. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 51 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: And of course they've absolutely ruled out a coalition with the SNP, which means they will do just that in the event of a hung parliament. It'll be a repeat of 1979 with Labour screwing Scotland over on sovereignty, then blaming the SNP for not propping them up afterwards. In fact, i'm convinced that's the very tactic they're gaming on. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 If Labour have the option of working with the SNP or letting the Tories back in they will go for the former. If Sir Keef tries to block it he will be out on his arse quicker than you can say ‘ministerial cars’. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) But he HAYTS NASHNALISM! He keeps saying so on telly while simultaneously being dangerously intimate with a union flag. Edited January 4 by KirkieRR Illiteracy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jedi Posted January 4 Share Posted January 4 (edited) 2 years is a long time to wait for a GE. At the moment tha Labour vote remains consistently at between 45-50% enough for a substantial majority. Of course the Tory vote will increase the closer the GE gets, but not enough to prevent a majority. Of course Labour should be more amenable to Europe, or at least having a discussion about EFTA but they won't prior to the GE due to the Red Wall 'issue'. As far as 'wrapping themselves in the union Jack goes'..don't agree with doing that either, but it's no different to the SNP never appearing sans saltire Similarly, declaring a willingness to 'work' with the SNP would simply hand the Tories the election. Hardly a tactic that any party seeking to form a govt would pursue. Edited January 4 by Jedi 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.