Jump to content

The normalisation of the far-right continues


Guest Bob Mahelp

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, BILmac1967 said:

So you need to be elected to be on the telly?

As an aside, iv;e never seen any of those far right headlines and images anywhere but on here.

No, however given he's been continually rejected by the electorate, it could seem there's an agenda at work by having him on 35 times. Would your local defeated candidates get that amount of exposure?

You should read more then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, carpetmonster said:

No, however given he's been continually rejected by the electorate, it could seem there's an agenda at work by having him on 35 times. Would your local defeated candidates get that amount of exposure?

You should read more then. 

I never said Farage should get more exposure, I pointed out that when he spoke, he was chased.

 

1 minute ago, carpetmonster said:

No, however given he's been continually rejected by the electorate, it could seem there's an agenda at work by having him on 35 times. Would your local defeated candidates get that amount of exposure?

You should read more then. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BILmac1967 said:

I never said Farage should get more exposure, I pointed out that when he spoke, he was chased.

 

 

Which, again, doesn't mean that he's being denied free speech. He picked an audience who didn't particularly want to hear it. If they don't have the right to tell him to go and f**k himself, then they're being denied free speech. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:

Which, again, doesn't mean that he's being denied free speech. He picked an audience who didn't particularly want to hear it. If they don't have the right to tell him to go and f**k himself, then they're being denied free speech. 

The people who chased him weren't his audience, they turned up to disrupt an advertised appearance.

And you presume that the people who chased him couldn't be wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BILmac1967 said:

The people who chased him weren't his audience, they turned up to disrupt an advertised appearance.

And you presume that the people who chased him couldn't be wrong?

I'd presume they'll have been wrong about many things, as most humans are, however they're still exercising their own free speech by telling Farage to f**k off. If anything it's the right who are looking to chill free speech; note the Tories' deciding to make peaceful protest punishable by up to 10 years imprisonment and the Republicans banning books from school and library systems in the US. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BILmac1967 said:

The people who chased him weren't his audience, they turned up to disrupt an advertised appearance.

And you presume that the people who chased him couldn't be wrong?

Again, you think barracking a politician you disapprove of is the same as throwing petrol bombs into an asylum seeker's reception centre?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BILmac1967 said:

The people who chased him weren't his audience, they turned up to disrupt an advertised appearance.

And you presume that the people who chased him couldn't be wrong?

Advertised? He didn't even tell the publican about his proposed stunt!

https://www.scotsman.com/news/nigel-farage-forced-flee-edinburghs-royal-mile-1574977 

"As the hubbub increased to a roar, it was time for the publican, who had no inkling of the press conference until contacted by the police two hours before, to intervene."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
12 hours ago, Clown Job said:

Won’t somebody please think of the private schools 

 

Hmmm... Must confess to being a bit conflicted here. 

What's the difference between paying fees and moving into the catchment area of a "better" state school by buying an expensive home that "ordinary" folk couldn't afford? As I heard (dunno if it's true) that a Labour education convener in Edinburgh did... Boroughmuir, I seem to recall. 

Will the state also ban aspirational parents from buying extra-curricular tuition for their kids? If it is not tax free presumably that unfair advantage for the parents of better off kids is fine and dandy. So that's ok then. Is it? Taking away the vat aspect purifies the inequality? Don't think so. 

Education - like (laughably) religion - has been seen in tax terms as a public good, therefore justifiably in receipt of tax breaks. If questionable benefits to wider society are the the determining factor for tax breaks I'd much rather that religion lost its tax advantages first.  

I am a member of a Scottish charity which has education as a major aspect of its charitable status justification and none of it relies on myths and legends or claiming knowledge about the origins of the universe that, frankly, no mammal can possibly "know" to be true.  Maths and physics delivered in a particular sort of school - no tax break. Burning bushes, talking snakes and women turning into salt - tax break? GTF! 🤣

Yes, drink has been taken. Danger of a rant developing so I'm off to my kip! 

Oidhche mhath! 

 

 

Edited by Salt n Vinegar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...