Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

Just now, welshbairn said:

You could always just go and quietly visit your extended family house by house. If I was a cop without full scale PPE I wouldn't go anywhere near a bunch of probably plague ridden manky Celtic fans, even without the Covid risk.

They were standing not too far away from them doing fck all as usual. Probably just wanted their robocop faces on the telly. I’d visit my Aunt and Uncle as they live literally 2 mins away but they’ve fallen for the scaremongering and have basically been in their house for 2 months solidly, they wouldn't let me in 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said:

Can’t believe people are still panicking about easing lockdown measures. There’s been 2 deaths reported today (albeit it’s the tinpot weekend figures). The news tonight mentioned that “covid could be here to stay for years”. Should life be put on pause until it disappears? 

You've been panicking for 8 weeks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Decent article about what the actual options are here. 

To sum up:

TTI

Rolling, targeted lockdowns 

Do nothing 

https://amp.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/12/tories-lockdown-social-distancing-testing-second-wave-coronavirus?__twitter_impression=true

BTW this I'm pretty sure is the defo wid I mentioned a few pages back. Huv. 

Edit: apologies if this is fear mongering. Maybe don't read if you're in a mad panic and want to believe the really contagious virus isn't contagious anymore because we've spent 8 weeks in the house. 

Edited by madwullie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously far too early to get too excited about but sounds positive at least and is an indication that some progress is being made hopefully.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/18/health/coronavirus-vaccine-moderna-early-results/index.html

Quote

It shows that not only did the antibody bind to the virus, but it prevented the virus from infecting the cells

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, madwullie said:

No of course not. No-one anywhere is saying that. Just that we have to make sure it's safe and we can control it before we start to loosen, otherwise our only option is to lockdown again if it does what it does and starts to get exponential again. 

If the purpose of the lockdown is to prevent an exponential increase in the infection rate then why does Sweden - where there has been no such lockdown for fully two months - still have a much lower per capita case rate and death rate than Scotland and the UK respectively? They should have literally millions of cases and the highest death toll in Europe right now going by this line of argument but they simply do not.

Some people got far too carried away about a brief period of rapid growth in cases and assumed that this would be a sustained trend - a straightforward comparison now shows that it wasn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Snafu said:

I haven't seen my mother since the second week of March she has dementia and is in a care home, she won't recognise anyone in the family now.

Hopefully you get to see her soon, this has been dreadful for so many people. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone's cut the grass. Safe job, but hardly essential.

Sorry to piss on your chips (not really), but for clubs to survive to the other side if this then course maintainance was deemed essential by the government. If greens hadn't been cut and fed properly they would have died off by now, and would need replaced at an estimated cost of 30k per green. That would have put the vast majority of clubs in Scotland out of business.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, virginton said:

If the purpose of the lockdown is to prevent an exponential increase in the infection rate then why does Sweden - where there has been no such lockdown for fully two months - still have a much lower per capita case rate and death rate than Scotland and the UK respectively? They should have literally millions of cases and the highest death toll in Europe right now going by this line of argument but they simply do not.

Some people got far too carried away about a brief period of rapid growth in cases and assumed that this would be a sustained trend - a straightforward comparison now shows that it wasn't. 

Isn't Sweden doing markedly worse than their neighbours who have far tighter lockdowns, and generally closer demographics, culture and connectivity to Sweden than to the UK, and thus a more direct comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Thereisalight.. said:

Ive not been panicking about the virus at all. I’ve just been missing my old life 

I never said it was about the virus, they could have piled the bodies up on the street and you'd still have moaned and whined about the lockdown, you'd better get used to this as it ain't going back to normal for a long while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, peasy23 said:

Sorry to piss on your chips (not really), but for clubs to survive to the other side if this then course maintainance was deemed essential by the government. If greens hadn't been cut and fed properly they would have died off by now, and would need replaced at an estimated cost of 30k per green. That would have put the vast majority of clubs in Scotland out of business.

 

Glad to hear it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ayrmad said:

I never said it was about the virus, they could have piled the bodies up on the street and you'd still have moaned and whined about the lockdown, you'd better get used to this as it ain't going back to normal for a long while. 

It will though. There is only so much political capital than can be expended on a extraordinary situation, omly so much patience, and at some point society will affect it's own version of normality which will involve all the things it likes doing at the expense of freedoms of those weaker and more vulnerable. This trend will be accelerated by the recoveries outside our borders and the necessity to get the economy running. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, renton said:

It will though. There is only so much political capital than can be expended on a extraordinary situation, omly so much patience, and at some point society will affect it's own version of normality which will involve all the things it likes doing at the expense of freedoms of those weaker and more vulnerable. This trend will be accelerated by the recoveries outside our borders and the necessity to get the economy running. 

All that is still a while away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, virginton said:

If the purpose of the lockdown is to prevent an exponential increase in the infection rate then why does Sweden - where there has been no such lockdown for fully two months - still have a much lower per capita case rate and death rate than Scotland and the UK respectively? They should have literally millions of cases and the highest death toll in Europe right now going by this line of argument but they simply do not.

Some people got far too carried away about a brief period of rapid growth in cases and assumed that this would be a sustained trend - a straightforward comparison now shows that it wasn't. 

That's a good point and there's definitely a lot to be learned about Sweden. But almost every western country experienced exponential growth until they locked down. Maybe social distancing alone would have been enough?

I do think we'll see a very sharp rise in cases in places where the govt and/or the public don't take those measures seriously in the coming months tho. The virus hasn't got any less contagious 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, virginton said:

Some people got far too carried away about a brief period of rapid growth in cases and assumed that this would be a sustained trend - a straightforward comparison now shows that it wasn't. 

Hypothetical question.

Had the virus not first popped up in a region of Italy which ultimately had a health system which was unable to cope, how many countries would have locked down rather than look to temporarily increase capacity and maybe encourage vulnerable groups yo be extra cautious?

I may have missed this as all the focus was on Italy, but how many other countries saw their healthcare systems overwhelmed?

Edited by Todd_is_God
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...