Scottish Premiership Survey (SPFL TV)

[footballresearch]

Hi everyone, 
I am an MBA student at St Mary’s University in London conducting research into Scottish football for my dissertation. In particular, I am investigating the reasons why fans choose to watch the Scottish Premiership on television, fan perception of the “Scottish Premiership” brand, and whether fans would be interested in an “SPFL TV” subscription service, independent of the current broadcasters. 

Therefore, I am asking fans of Scottish football aged between 18-64 to complete a short questionnaire exploring these issues. The responses will then be analysed and will form part of my final published dissertation. If you are interested in taking part, you can click on the following link which will take you to the questionnaire:

https://essex.eu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eJxhKzAFfdr3PIV

This questionnaire does not require you to identify yourself, or to give any contact details, and all results published will be entirely anonymised. All information you provide will be treated in the strictest confidence. 

This questionnaire should take roughly 5 minutes to complete. There are no costs associated with completing this questionnaire other than your time. 

Thank you for reading this post, and for taking the questionnaire if you choose to do so.

Edited May 5, 2020 by footballresearch

[The DA]

Done.

[ropy]

Turns out I am quite the sad fan boy

[dezz]

Done

[tree house tam]

[Ric]

Indeed, Tam. If someone is that bothered about knowing our opinion, they should spend time posting in here rather than just create an account and expect us to jump to it.

[naegoodinthedark]

Is this really worth the tuition fees?

[Doctor Manhattan]

Out of interest, what's the rationale for excluding those aged 65 and over? (Not that I'm saying it's necessarily a bad idea, based on some of the wallopers in that age group who actually go to matches.)

[Ludo*1]

2 minutes ago, Doctor Manhattan said:

Out of interest, what's the rationale for excluding those aged 65 and over? (Not that I'm saying it's necessarily a bad idea, based on some of the wallopers in that age group who actually go to matches.)

You're unlikely to get a reply. They post their link and are never seen again. Think there's been about 2 or 3 that have ever bothered to hang around for a few days.

[Doctor Manhattan]

2 minutes ago, Speroni*1 said:

You're unlikely to get a reply. They post their link and are never seen again. Think there's been about 2 or 3 that have ever bothered to hang around for a few days.

Glad I didn't waste any time opening the actual survey then. 

[DA Baracus]

A surprising level of literary from the OP. Usually these things look like a primary school child, or a smarter than average Sevco fan, has written it.

[footballresearch]

24 minutes ago, Doctor Manhattan said:

Out of interest, what's the rationale for excluding those aged 65 and over? (Not that I'm saying it's necessarily a bad idea, based on some of the wallopers in that age group who actually go to matches.)

Hi, the age brackets are dictated by the University's ethical guidelines, not a personal choice. 

 

[Sergeant Wilson]

I answered all the questions but didn't actually read any of them. Hope this helps.

[Doctor Manhattan]

1 hour ago, Speroni*1 said:

You're unlikely to get a reply. They post their link and are never seen again. Think there's been about 2 or 3 that have ever bothered to hang around for a few days.

31 minutes ago, footballresearch said:

Hi, the age brackets are dictated by the University's ethical guidelines, not a personal choice. 

Well, well, well. Suppose I'll have to do the poxy survey now, Jamie, seems only fair. 

Top tip for any old codgers: Just check the "Prefer not to say" box when asked for your age.

 

[Guest JTS98]

On 06/05/2020 at 01:34, Sergeant Wilson said:

I answered all the questions but didn't actually read any of them. Hope this helps.

It probably does, to be fair. More people answering is more evidence. What the answers are doesn't really matter, as he'll have an angle for each response anyway.