Jump to content

EPL 20/21


Derry Alli

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

Reducing the number of EPL sides and removing a cup so that the BIG SIX can play glamour friendlies is not reasonable.

Looks like some EFL mugs are going to try and push it through. Football finance expert Peter Risdale

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/oct/13/efl-clubs-agree-to-put-their-support-behind-project-big-picture?CMP=share_btn_tw

Risdale's record. Leeds - Newco'd, Barnsley - nearly liquidated, Cardiff - multiple winding up orders with debt of £66m, Plymouth - administration. Why is this guy even allowed to be involved in football?

The article also doesn't clearly state that the "£250m transferred to the Football League" is actually a loan.

And apparently they are getting rid of parachute payments with the money given directly to the EFL to distribute. Of course this money will be reduced while paying back the £250m loan. Even if some EFL idiots are going to try and push it through the lack of a safety net for the reduced size EPL will surely mean that the proposal goes in the bin.

Scratching my head at what the problem is with the proposals- 25 percent of broadcast revenue to EFL. Funds ringfenced for football infrastructure (which should mean less money spent by the taxpayer), should guarantee the future of EFL clubs for years. Ending parachute payments may result in less kamikaze spending to get to the Barclays too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, sparky88 said:

Scratching my head at what the problem is with the proposals- 25 percent of broadcast revenue to EFL. Funds ringfenced for football infrastructure (which should mean less money spent by the taxpayer), should guarantee the future of EFL clubs for years. Ending parachute payments may result in less kamikaze spending to get to the Barclays too.

It the handing over voting rights to 9 (6 in reality as only 6 need agree to pass votes) clubs bit. The “big six” plus West Ham, Everton and Southampton as longest continuous members of EPL.

They want to be able to vote on tv and media deals, veto new owners coming into other clubs (we’ve got our oil rich sheik but you can’t have yours type of thing), and the rescue package is apparently a loan which would have been the parachute payment money so possible needs paid back at some point (or money withheld to the value of it).

Not all of the proposals seem to be that bad on their own but the Trojan horse nature of the voting rights make it unacceptable.

I think the worst thing is that they’ve done this at a time when they know EFL teams are struggling badly due to Corona and are trying to use that need to take over and grab power for themselves.

Sky News - Project Big Picture

 

Edited by Jambomo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These big clubs use the bad position of smaller clubs as an excuse for a complete powergrab, they are basically holding a gun to heads. It's absolutely disgusting and immoral what they are doing. This just shows that the "big 6" don't give a sh!t about lower leagues or football in general, they only care about their own interests but act as if they're suddenly into "charity" now. This is about taking control now, next thing is stopping relegation & B-teams in the EFL and if they have full control they can push that through. Both have to be resisted at all costs.

Thankfully supporters of all clubs seem to be strongly against this, including the vast majority of Liverpool & Man Utd themselves. Hopefully this disgraceful plan will be binned asap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, sparky88 said:

Scratching my head at what the problem is with the proposals- 25 percent of broadcast revenue to EFL. Funds ringfenced for football infrastructure (which should mean less money spent by the taxpayer), should guarantee the future of EFL clubs for years. Ending parachute payments may result in less kamikaze spending to get to the Barclays too.

There is a lack of detail about the 25%. What is it 25% of? Is it all TV revenue, that would be a HUGE increase to the EFL. Going from ~£200m per season to over ~£600m. If the EFL were really getting that much additional money they wouldn't need a loan.

http://priceoffootball.com/tag/broadcast-income/

Read this and you can see how the EPL changed their rules to reduce their solidarity payments to the EFL.

Instead this 25% takes in the current EFL tv deal (the EPL gain the EFL broadcast rights in perpituity), all parachute and solidarity payments which totals around £400m per season.

25% still looks a generous boost ~£600m instead of ~£400m per season right? But what if it wasn't 25% of all the money. Currently the EPL has 3 pots of money.

  • Equal shareed money that is the basis for current payments to the EFL,
  • Merit money based on league position
  • TV match fees

Project Big Picture is scrapping pot 1 and having payments based only on merit. So the EFL's 25% will come out that pot but I assume they would not get to touch the TV match fees pot. And the BIG SIX would be free to move more and more money into TV match fees and out of shared pots in the future. Suddenly the EFL pot starts to shrink back to where it was

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Terrible tackle, lucky to get away with it. I take it the ref can't give him a yellow because it was called offside?
No idea. I thought stuff like that could be punished after the whistle anyway but have no facts to back that up. It's a nice character arc to see his qualities quickly become incredibly detrimental.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spud131 said:
6 minutes ago, accies1874 said:
Pickford you fucking moron. Dead man walking.

Terrible tackle, lucky to get away with it. I take it the ref can't give him a yellow because it was called offside?

Nah, you can still card. I've seen that a few times where it's been offside, or already out for a throw-in but a player has been cleared out.

It's bizarre that they've not asked the referee to look at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...