Jump to content

The Gender Debate


jamamafegan

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said:

Dorries threatening to cancel the licence fee had made the BBC more Tory than ever.

That statement is nothing but straight up transphobia.

I wouldn't go that far, they were clarifying something that had obviously been raised by complaints and had a duty to be transparent about. The BBC has never been free of Government pressure, the time they utterly surrendered for the first time I can remember was under Blair over the sexed up case for war in Iraq intelligence report and the top management were sacked and replaced for allowing the truth to be told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I wouldn't go that far, they were clarifying something that had obviously been raised by complaints and had a duty to be transparent about. The BBC has never been free of Government pressure, the time they utterly surrendered for the first time I can remember was under Blair over the sexed up case for war in Iraq intelligence report and the top management were sacked and replaced for allowing the truth to be told.

It does rather make you wonder what else they might feel that have to be "open and transparent" about in the future, assuming they receive a few complaints from a properly motivated and organised group.

"In our recent article about British athletes, we can clarify that one of them was a Muslim, a fact that wasn't available to our Sports Desk at the time of writing".

Peep peep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

I wouldn't go that far, they were clarifying something that had obviously been raised by complaints and had a duty to be transparent about.

Should the BBC really be publicly disclosing someone’s personal information like that though? 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Clown Job said:

Should the BBC really be publicly disclosing someone’s personal information like that though? 
 

Good point, but have they? I presume they were asked if any of the contestants in a show were trans and they said yes, without identifying the individual. I'm not sure if they had a choice to say none of your business, which I'd much prefer.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Clown Job said:

Should the BBC really be publicly disclosing someone’s personal information like that though? 
 

The contestant says that they didn't give the BBC consent.

 

 

 

Edited by Sherrif John Bunnell
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Clown Job said:

Should the BBC really be publicly disclosing someone’s personal information like that though? 
 

The bbc showing a lack of professionalism,  I'm shocked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

If it had been true that it was the first time in it's 55 year history that all the finalists were women that would have quite rightly been a newsworthy item.

Having made that statement, they were duty bound to correct it when it turned out not to be true.

As an aside, I reckon we're about a year away from anyone using the phrase "trans" being cancelled or "held to account". I mean, if you truly believe a trans woman is a real woman then there is no need for the word "trans" as it then becomes a divisive word. This specific Womans Hour situation, which is causing angst, is a great example of that. That's my prediction for where the Woke Warriors are heading on this issue.

"Womans Hour" (sic) is causing me some angst. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oaksoft, there; the "great supporter" of trans rights in the same manner as worker's rights: speaking out against them whenever possible.

Poor taste for a parody account.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oaksoft, there; the "great supporter" of trans rights in the same manner as worker's rights: speaking out against them whenever possible.
Poor taste for a parody account.
Wonder what he means by "Woke" in this context. He was recently delivering sermons to others on "looking beyond the virtue signallers" on that topic IIRC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bairnardo said:

Wonder what he means by "Woke" in this context. He was recently delivering sermons to others on "looking beyond the virtue signallers" on that topic IIRC

Anybody who dares to publicly disagree with current right-wing talking points is "woke".

He's occasionally been "woke" himself when it's suited the aim of garnering responses. Same goes with "virtue signalling", which he's perfectly happy to do for attention when it suits. See the pretend caring about people on low incomes, from a poster who used to openly admit he hated human beings, couldn't wait to cut contact with them after retirement, and celebrated the introduction of Universal Credit because it would hurt benefit scroungers. Now he's deeply concerned about the same people because the nasty middle-classes are taking all their money  :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...