Jump to content

Next permanent Scotland manager


.  

253 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said:

Ach well, you'll never have that problem...

^^^ conveniently forgetting that I have green dotted his posts before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/03/2023 at 13:16, welshbairn said:

The only reason you know his name is probably because of who he's married to. It's probably also  the main reason for all the unsubstantiated allegations. Anyone who uses the rules to stop Cherry getting into a position of power in the party is OK in my book. 

 

On 18/03/2023 at 13:33, welshbairn said:

I was talking about the fraud allegations, not using his knowledge of the rulebook to get a desired outcome which is standard politics. 

 

On 18/03/2023 at 13:34, virginton said:

So you're claiming that the investigative journalism of Private Eye regarding the Ted Crilly campaign funds was fabricated because Sturgeon's husband?

Looks like Police Scotland are in on the conspiracy as well. 🤡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 23/02/2023 at 17:54, Jim McLean's Ghost said:

If only there was some sort of recent supreme decision that scuppered any chance Sturgeon had of delivering a referendum.

What other reason are you going to suggest?

You have your answer now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A non-story in The Express:

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/snp-addicted-secrecy-party-told-29672718

Clearly The Express hasn't heard of GDPR - no party can publish if someone is a member or not - if he were suspended that is a different matter - but that’s not the case as far as I am aware.

 

Edited by DeeTillEhDeh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

A non-story in The Express:

https://www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/snp-addicted-secrecy-party-told-29672718

Clearly The Express hasn't heard of GDPR - no party can publish if someone is a member or not - if he were suspended that is a different matter - but that’s not the case as far as I am aware.

 

Im sure that story was retweeted by the c**t that is Murdo Fraser too. Even a walloper like him should know better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...