Jump to content

SPFL Clubs raising the drawbridge?


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The Moonster said:

I agree that automatic relegation at the bottom needs changed but thats got f**k all to do with the nonsense I replied to previously. Time for you to go on ignore I think. 

Ignore any posts that call into question the fact that diddy SPFL clubs are running scared of losing their hand outs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Greenmachine said:

Ignore any posts that call into question the fact that diddy SPFL clubs are running scared of losing their hand outs?

You can’t seriously be trying to argue that clubs genuinely believe that adding a few more requirements is going to stop teams coming up. It’s not like they’ve suddenly asked for the fabled gold plated toilets the old blazers used to lie about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

You can’t seriously be trying to argue that clubs genuinely believe that adding a few more requirements is going to stop teams coming up. It’s not like they’ve suddenly asked for the fabled gold plated toilets the old blazers used to lie about

Why bother with it then?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nowhereman said:

Why would clubs need a legal expert? Cant they just instruct a lawyer as and when they need one?

Maybe it's an Old Firm thing seeing as they seem permamently  using lawyers to deal with their run-ins with UEFA/SPFL/SFA with regards to their fans' behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Greenmachine said:

Why bother with it then?

 

To ensure more professional standards whilst maintaining safety for fans, players and employees whilst safe guarding the clubs and league from any legal ramifications.

The same reason that only licensed clubs can get promoted to the lowland and highland league and why Beith weren’t eligible for promotion this year after winning the WOSL premier.

But you know it’s a load of shite eh? These bloody self preserving SPFL league 2 teams eh
 

 

Edited by Ocelot1877
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Ocelot1877 said:

To ensure more professional standards whilst maintaining safety for fans, players and employees whilst safe guarding the clubs and league from any legal ramifications.

The same reason that only licensed clubs can get promoted to the lowland and highland league and why Beith weren’t eligible for promotion this year after winning the WOSL premier.

But you know it’s a load of shite eh? These bloody self preserving SPFL league 2 teams eh
 

 

I’m sure having those extra covered areas up to 500 will make it much safer 😂

What will happen to the clubs that are currently in the SPFL that are entry level like Airdrie etc?

Edited by Greenmachine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Greenmachine said:

I’m sure having those extra covered areas up to 500 will make it much safer 😂

What will happen to the clubs that are currently in the SPFL that are entry level like Airdrie etc?

I don’t know why you have picked a requirement that obviously makes things safer to make your point? 
 

Teams that are currently in the league system and ones that are chasing  promotion will still be able to apply for waivers/exceptions as has already been covered and stated by the authorities. 

Just so we are clear what out of the below requirements from entry to bronze has got you so upset?

Bronze
5.4 The Field The field shall be rated in
“satisfactory” condition.
5.4 The Field FIFA Quality Pro, club to demonstrate annually it meets the standard
5.4 The Field 95x60m (+5x4m)
5.4 The Field (Actual numbers rather than best practice)
5.4 The Field No other markings on the field
5.4 The Field Socketed goalposts
5.8 Dressing Rooms
Match officials room with space for 5 instead of 4
5.13 Spectator Areas Cover for home and away fans
5.13 Spectator Areas Cover for 500 (up from 100)
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators Appoint a disability access officer
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators No sightline obstructions
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators PA adjacent seating
6.1 Training and Coaching Facilities for Senior Players Suitable training facilities
6.3 Medical and First Aid Facilities for Senior Players Rehabilitation Medical examination facility (not third party)
6.4 Medical and First Aid Provision for Senior Players at Matches
Club doctor/paramedic, physiotherapist, medical bag
6.6 Team Manager/ Head Coach B licence
6.7 First Team Coaches B licence
6.8 Club Doctor or Medical Officer Clubs shall have one
6.9 Club Therapist Clubs shall have one
6.10 Goalkeeping Coach Clubs shall have one
8.4 Finance Manager Clubs shall have a professional one
8.5 Safety Officer Clubs shall have a qualified one
8.11 Annual Financial Statements Stricter, prepared by qualified accountant
8.13 Insolvency Events Not since June 2020
8.17 Attendance at a Scottish FA Organised Event on Refereeing Matters
Manager/coach and team captain (instead of just someone from the club)
8.19 Diversity and Inclusion
The club shall identify the training requirements for staff and key volunteers and create a learning development plan within the equality action plan.

 

Edited by Ocelot1877
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Ocelot1877 said:

I don’t know why you have picked a requirement that obviously makes things safer to make your point? 
 

Teams that are currently in the league system and ones that are chasing  promotion will still be able to apply for waivers/exceptions as has already been covered and stated by the authorities. 

Just so we are clear what out of the below requirements from entry to bronze has got you so upset?

Bronze
5.4 The Field The field shall be rated in
“satisfactory” condition.
5.4 The Field FIFA Quality Pro, club to demonstrate annually it meets the standard
5.4 The Field 95x60m (+5x4m)
5.4 The Field (Actual numbers rather than best practice)
5.4 The Field No other markings on the field
5.4 The Field Socketed goalposts
5.8 Dressing Rooms
Match officials room with space for 5 instead of 4
5.13 Spectator Areas Cover for home and away fans
5.13 Spectator Areas Cover for 500 (up from 100)
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators Appoint a disability access officer
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators No sightline obstructions
5.15 Provision for Disabled Spectators PA adjacent seating
6.1 Training and Coaching Facilities for Senior Players Suitable training facilities
6.3 Medical and First Aid Facilities for Senior Players Rehabilitation Medical examination facility (not third party)
6.4 Medical and First Aid Provision for Senior Players at Matches
Club doctor/paramedic, physiotherapist, medical bag
6.6 Team Manager/ Head Coach B licence
6.7 First Team Coaches B licence
6.8 Club Doctor or Medical Officer Clubs shall have one
6.9 Club Therapist Clubs shall have one
6.10 Goalkeeping Coach Clubs shall have one
8.4 Finance Manager Clubs shall have a professional one
8.5 Safety Officer Clubs shall have a qualified one
8.11 Annual Financial Statements Stricter, prepared by qualified accountant
8.13 Insolvency Events Not since June 2020
8.17 Attendance at a Scottish FA Organised Event on Refereeing Matters
Manager/coach and team captain (instead of just someone from the club)
8.19 Diversity and Inclusion
The club shall identify the training requirements for staff and key volunteers and create a learning development plan within the equality action plan.

 

Keeps clubs like Pollok and Beith down without major infrastructure expense with their pitches.Yet it’s apparently ok if the pitch is an absolute shambles as long as it’s the right size and flat like Dumbarton.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Greenmachine said:

Keeps clubs like Pollok and Beith down without major infrastructure expense with their pitches.Yet it’s apparently ok if the pitch is an absolute shambles as long as it’s the right size and flat like Dumbarton.

 


Beith and Pollok aren’t in the lowland league and in a world where they were and on the verge of getting promoted they could apply for a waiver/ exception as has been stated to you yet again. 

Beith are currently being kept down because they haven’t got an SFA license so they weren’t able to participate in the promotion playoff after winning the league.

There are currently safety concerns at Newlandsfield which is why their capacity got cut to 900 despite being able to hold much more. In terms of their pitch not being big enough to meet the bronze standard of the league it is unfortunately an expense they will need to pay but one that is achievable.
The same way Dumbarton pay money to make their pitch meet the criteria of the league. 
 

Imagine wanting to play on a flat pitch. What a world eh 😂

Again I’ll ask, what one of the requirements stated from Entry license to Bronze license do you not think should be in place for a club playing in league 2?

Edited by Ocelot1877
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Greenmachine said:

Keeps clubs like Pollok and Beith down without major infrastructure expense with their pitches.Yet it’s apparently ok if the pitch is an absolute shambles as long as it’s the right size and flat like Dumbarton.

 

Bronze licensing requires a satisfactory rating from the referees pitch reports of the course of the season.  So no it’s not ok to be an absolute shambles and it wouldn’t surprise me if someone has asked Dumbarton about this.

And the size/gradient requirements for a bronze licence are not that difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Ocelot1877 said:


Beith and Pollok aren’t in the lowland league and in a world where they were and on the verge of getting promoted they could apply for a waiver/ exception as has been stated to you yet again. 

Beith are currently being kept down because they haven’t got an SFA license so they weren’t able to participate in the promotion playoff after winning the league.

There are currently safety concerns at Newlandsfield which is why their capacity got cut to 900 despite being able to hold much more. In terms of their pitch not being big enough to meet the bronze standard of the league it is unfortunately an expense they will need to pay but one that is achievable.
The same way Dumbarton pay money to make their pitch meet the criteria of the league. 
 

Imagine wanting to play on a flat pitch. What a world eh 😂

Again I’ll ask, what one of the requirements stated from Entry license to Bronze license do you not think should be in place for a club playing in league 2?

Entry level is fine for Mickey Mouse part time football with a few hundred people at it.

Edited by Greenmachine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Greenmachine said:

There are 2 AUTOMATIC relegation places from the EFL.

I can’t think of a country with a pyramid system which doesn’t have an automatic relegation place?

That's only since very recently. Before that it was one. Before that it was none at all. Not even a play-off.

And it's two from a division with 24 clubs in it. Not 2 from ten - which is what you seem to be suggesting (and which would be insane.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, parsforlife said:

You can’t seriously be trying to argue that clubs genuinely believe that adding a few more requirements is going to stop teams coming up. It’s not like they’ve suddenly asked for the fabled gold plated toilets the old blazers used to lie about

The stuff on pitch dimensions absolutely has a massive impact on clubs like Pollok etc who could tick all the other boxes in time but would cost them millions to move to a new ground which met the dimension criteria. It is a bit of a farce that Dumbarton can play on what is one of the worst playing surfaces in Scottish football (not only that but be allowed to have a groundsharing agreement also) with a corner flag going into a sink hole but a surface like newlandsfield (and as much as i hate pollok they keep it in great condition) isnt acceptable. 
Having a doctor at every game is difficult, something that lots of existing  teams are going to find more difficult as the shortage of doctors increases. Some medical indemnity companies wont insure GPs to undertake this work. Id agree with having a sports first aider, cpr trained staff and working defib at every ground as a minimum. 

3 hours ago, Greenmachine said:

I’m sure having those extra covered areas up to 500 will make it much safer 😂

What will happen to the clubs that are currently in the SPFL that are entry level like Airdrie etc?

Kick them out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

The stuff on pitch dimensions absolutely has a massive impact on clubs like Pollok etc who could tick all the other boxes in time but would cost them millions to move to a new ground which met the dimension criteria. It is a bit of a farce that Dumbarton can play on what is one of the worst playing surfaces in Scottish football (not only that but be allowed to have a groundsharing agreement also) with a corner flag going into a sink hole but a surface like newlandsfield (and as much as i hate pollok they keep it in great condition) isnt acceptable. 
Having a doctor at every game is difficult, something that lots of existing  teams are going to find more difficult as the shortage of doctors increases. Some medical indemnity companies wont insure GPs to undertake this work. Id agree with having a sports first aider, cpr trained staff and working defib at every ground as a minimum.  

Nearly every spfl club meets the current requirements and those who don’t have agreed they will.  If current requirements become too difficult for large amounts of clubs to meet then they’ll be adapted appropriately.  
 

on pitches Cowdenbeath and Brechin were previously notorious for being small parks and both meet the requirements, though I’m sure Central Park was widened to do so even if it still plays narrow.

95 x 60 is a small pitch, if clubs can’t meet that even with adaptations I’m not sure what to say other than telling them to sort it out and not ask to play profesional 11 aside football on a 7 aside pitch.  Looking at pics I struggle to see how Newlandsfield can’t be adapted, it only needs a 1m or so right the way around,  expensive, maybe but their close enough that if they got to the spfl(which is a minimum 2 years away) I reckon they get a 2-3 year waiver plus maybe another similar period under small fines. During that time they probably pocket close to 1/2 a million if not more through league prize money, league cup entry etc, they’ll also find themselves more eligible for funding there’s 6 figure sums going around to help with this sort of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/07/2023 at 17:38, Beachcomber said:

New Dundas Park certainly  needs toilets built, the "Portaloos" were disgusting.

Fech me stenny had themselves and Queens playing in a ground that had 4 or 5 portaloos as toilets in the away end for the full season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...