it was one of those Murray displays that totally baffles, had that lethargic and miss-timing everything performance going on. A bit like how he played against nadal at wimbledon. But even so, he was better than that display and came really close to winning. The game before he lost his serve in the 5th set he put verdasco under so much pressure, the game lasted about 10-15 minutes with plenty of deuces. I think he shot his bolt in that game, and with verdasco serving so well just couldn't convert the pressure and take the break. he was toast on his service game after that, clearly knackered and it was all over at that point. I think that was a bit of inexperience from him, but not really a lot you can do about that, he has to go for the break if he sniffs it. Verdasco's serving was unreal, much like Murray himself, if he gets 75/80% first serves, your opponent ain't going to break you. Verdasco was getting something like 90% first servers in the last 2 sets...
I thought Nadal in the final showed how smart a player he can be. In the 5th set once he got up a break, he didn't give a shit how Federer served and was happy to play the games, not bust himself looking for the second break and bring it home on his own serve. I know he has this rep of being a tiger and fighting for every point, but when he needs to, like in a slam final, he plays real real smart tennis. Federer might think he had the momentum coming back to 2-2 in sets, but Nadal had him in the 5th, and Nadal new it. Same thing, Federer was so busy trying to pummel him in the 4th set, Nadal had the energy when it mattered in the 5th.
Christ, just realised I officially prefer tennis over the spl (though it's still behind proper football, theskillful stuff from top rate players)