Jump to content

bhoonaman

Gold Members
  • Posts

    332
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by bhoonaman

  1. WRT Cameron - Have to disagree. His failure several times to quickly play in Stevenson when on the break, instead dithering and checking back was hugely frustrating. When the roles were reversed, Stevenson played Cameron in brilliantly, for Cameron then to fail to square the ball to an unmarked Scullion at the back post. On the plus side, he stopped getting caught offside when moved centrally.
  2. Just watched the highlight. Jesus suffering f**k, what a goal to give away. Easiest header that Grant could ever have. As others have said, he must have gotten a shout from somewhere.
  3. The hype and anticipation for this game is ….. shite.
  4. I personally blocked him very shortly after he started posting. Came across as a disingenuous troll. Never looked back.
  5. We know Rennie can find the back of the net, but lacks the ability to be a target man. So, a speedy winger or two with reasonable delivery might just be the solution. cue Rennie getting double fracture first game of the season.
  6. Ffs, next you’ll be telling us about this great new band called Kiss you saw last night
  7. How is McQueen doing? Always liked him in his time at Clyde.
  8. So begs the question - “why the hell is he pulling on the strip at all?” Sounds like Duffy made his peace with him if he has signed him before but this is the first major test of the board allowing Duffy to make. “ football decisions” as that must surely come within the framework of not dragging the club through the court of public opinion again, especially this close to the crown point decision.
  9. We couldn’t pull the “rehabilitation” or “second chance” card either as it looks like he claimed mistaken identity, as an American football team were also there, “60% of whom were black”.
  10. I also heard the timeless classic “go tae ‘um” that still gets a weekly airing to this day.
  11. Take your point. Ah well, so the phrase used for a long term absentee returning of “it’s like a new signing” is utter bollocks too for the same reasons.
  12. Fresh start? He played one game then was out for most of the season. Another year would be just like a fresh start. More likely, as has been intimated is the deal offered was bettered by Peterhead.
  13. I really hope so as Rennie showed ability on the ball, but was ponderous and didn’t chase back. If it really was fitness then fingers crossed we might have a decent goal threat. That said, as Stonehouse said before (iirc) he gets into good poacher positions but we still need the service line.
  14. And it’s not even particularly tempting bribes. FFS, is £40k the going rate for a lower league team to drop its knickers?
  15. As long as you finish 10 points adrift of us in second then fair enough
  16. So, did the Rennie fan club enjoy that performance tonight from him? He is a luxury player who needs actual grafters and triers to do all the dirty work and put in the effort so he can be "in the right place to tap it into the net". A big lump of a lad who make a token gesture to jump beside a centre half with no intention of actually winning the ball. Frustrating as f**k. The one player who looked like he really gave a f**k tonight ended up with his foot facing the wrong way. I really hope that is not a career ending injury for Quitongo. Terrible thing to happen to anyone.
  17. He was given a big budget to push for promotion and produced a mediocre season.
  18. Regardless, as soon as they said they were not renewing the lease, it left us with zero leverage to try and negotiate any deal with them other than something worse that the existing arrangement.
  19. Who said it was a conspiracy ? Why are we bringing up leaving Broadwood early (which I was responding to), a year after it happened? It happened, and I was not overly disappointed that it did.
  20. Or was that the excuse they were looking for to get rid of us and Welcome the Open Goal experiment and Celtic Ladies? That player was on our books for several seasons before the statement, so if he was the reason then why was he not banned from the stadium long before and club given longer notice to find an alternative venue? I don't buy the "it was NLL who ran it" excuse - NLL are answerable to NLC so influence could have been brought to bear very easily earlier on.
  21. NLL had stated they would not renew out lease beyond this season. The stage of the Crownpoint bid is completely irrelevant. If we had seen out our last year of our lease, what difference would that have made to our finances or long term security?
×
×
  • Create New...