Jump to content

SGMilne

Gold Members
  • Posts

    389
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by SGMilne

  1. 3 hours ago, ArabFC said:

    You’ve watched our performances and have come to the conclusion that players not playing are to blame?

    The point I had made was that if Ross doesn't think the likes of Clark and Chalmers are either good enough to come off the bench  - or in the case of Chalmers not even make the bench  - then they need moved on.

    Nicky Clark is on £2500 p/w and Ross clearly doesn't rate him, so we need to move him on. He's a proven goalscorer at Premiership level in spite of being limited, and he'd certainly still be a good player in the Championship so I don't doubt there'd be someone out there willing to take him off our hands, even if it meant us supplementing his salary or giving him the difference up front.

    Yesterday I watched Robbie Neilson bring on 5 subs, each of whom could easily have started a game and the team would be as good if not better. Jack Ross made two subs and had no interest in bringing anyone else on, because they wouldn't have made any difference. We're not Hearts and don't have their budget but considering what we'll be paying some of those guys who are sitting on the bench good money, they have to be good enough to be called upon when the first XI aren't performing.

    Anyway, other points I'd made were...

    - Keeper needs dropped. He can't be as bad as he's shown so far, but when someone's struggling as badly as he is, surely the point of having two first team goalkeepers is that if one isn't performing, the other one steps up. As above, if Ross doesn't trust Erikssen, then we need to offload him and bring in someone he does trust

    - Liam Smith needs dropped and potentially moved on. I just don't think he's a good right back. In games at Tannadice, everything seems to go through him as well and he just doesn't have the attacking ability and over the last week he's shown he's an easy target for the opposition. Ironically, I felt he performed better in midfield and centre back last season than he ever has at right back. Freeman offers so much more going forward

    - Behich looks like he'll be a good signing. He had a horror debut but in amongst a lot of poor performers yesterday he got into the box to win the pen and has some dig about him

    - Cudjoe must play! He's the only player who seems to have a bit of attacking intent at the moment. He lost his man for the second goal but on the whole he did a lot of work tracking back and going forward

    - Defensive Midfielder is a must. When you are forced to play your best centre back in central midfield, then something's gone wrong with your recruitment. We need some dig in there

    - 343/352 might be a better option? Last season the trio at the back worked quite well. It reduced our attacking intent but at least we looked steady.

     

  2. 41 minutes ago, Pull My Strings said:

    You're mistaken if you think that there's universal opposition to appointing a Head Coach who will be tasked with introducing the best Academy players into the first team.

    Mellon was asked to do that, said he would do that, started the season by doing that and then shat out. He would obviously argue, with some justification, that the ends justify the means. First priority was to survive and we did that. Second priority, it would appear, was to develop the young players and he clearly didn't do that to the extent that was required and wasn't prepared to do that in the future. It seems perfectly sensible therefore to appoint a guy who will follow the club's longer term plans. United have poured a huge amount of money into the Academy and have a number of very promising players. That money will have been utterly wasted if those players aren't then given the opportunity to play. United appear to have now taken a very deliberate decision to say that we're now going to focus on a new Head Coach who will play the young players at the expense of a more established manager who will better guarantee survival at the cost of potentially neglecting the youngsters again.  There's a very obvious danger in pursuing such a strategy in that you develop youngsters at the expense of first team results but, equally, a very obvious benefit if it works in that you manage to acquire players of a higher technical standard than you could obtain from the transfer market, you pay less in wages, you save money on the churn of mediocre squad fillers and you potentially develop players with a re-sale value which couldn't otherwise be achieved. 

    There will obviously be dissenting voices but that's just the nature of football fans and social media. You'll find just as many fans supporting the idea. I'd personally be delighted to see it. Football is meant to be an entertainment. Last year it wasn't. I think I can honestly say that I was actively entertained on one occasion last season. With another couple of decent performances on top of that. Most weeks it was eye bleeding stuff. Mission accomplished for Mellon in that we survived but survival shouldn't be the limit of your ambitions otherwise what's the fucking point.

    Unless you think that's a reference to Tam Courts in particular, which seems like a bit of a stretch. 

    I think that's very well put.

  3. Jumping in with an apology to Dundee fans and data purists.

    One of my absolute last things I did before the data lock was add Jack Wilkie into the game, but on autopilot I've made him 26 rather than 16.

    Balls.

  4. 5 hours ago, oneteaminglasgow said:

    @SGMilne - only issues I've noticed is that  we've still got Declan Glass, pretty sure he's been sent back to Dundee United with his injury. Bradley Renfrew is also at Cumbernauld Colts on loan for the season. Appreciate these may have already been picked up.

    Also, both Neil Scally and Alan Archibald are assistant managers in real life, but Scally is listed as a coach? I don't know if that's something hardwired into the game.

    The thing about Glass is that his injury happened in Thistle's pre-season but well into United's season. So an injury that happened on that date doesn't show up in the game.

    So I was faced with the unusual choice of having a fit Declan Glass in the Utd squad or the Thistle squad.

    I took the view that if the injury didn't happen he'd still be at Thistle, so left him there.

  5. 1 hour ago, C. Muir said:

    We signed a player on 31st October which is obviously quite recent, will he be with us in the beta or full release? Cammy Palmer btw.

    Will probably bite the bullet and buy today at some point.

    He's at Clyde in the game.

    We should have got all those loans I think

  6. 7 hours ago, Les Cabbage said:

    Noticed one minor mistake with data at Hibs, Yrick Galantes is on loan at ADT of The Philippines, looks to have been missed, nothing major though @SGMilne

    We made that change on the 9th so it won't be in the beta but will be in the full release.

    Thanks for pointing it out though :)

  7. 5 hours ago, RandomGuy. said:

    Will you want to know about these? Or are they things already fixed for the full release?

    Buzzing for this, and might even ignore the actual Saints game tonight if United turn it into a slog again.

    Back up CB will be my first target, of some description, and going to attempt to build a 5-2-3 set up similar to real life.

    The only one that sticks out that I remember not being right is Jeando Fuchs, but apart from him, report it and if we've already changed it then we've already changed it.

  8. As always, a quick point about the beta when it comes...

    We're still working on the data as it is just a beta; the game won't be perfect yet by any means.

    So if there's any data errors (so objective errors rather than subjective opinions on ratings etc) please tag me here and let me know. We still have a small window in which to change them.

    FWIW the data that's being used will be a little bit out of date, so I think there might be some wage and squad number issues, and I believe that from a league rules standpoint, we don't have the correct substitution rules in for the Scottish Championship.

  9. 14 hours ago, ScoRoss said:

    Another issue is when Scotland does reach 5 teams in Europe, the fifth team ends up still being involved in the League Cup group stages. Leading to playing three games a week to fit all the matches in.

    Hmm, that's an interesting one as I'm not sure how the coding team will overcome it.

    I can ask the question

  10. 12 hours ago, Big Fifer said:

    Just whilst you're here, can you change East Fife's pitch to a 3G surface on the next game? 

    As far as I'm aware that's done. It's certain in as a Synthetic surface

  11. 2 hours ago, Ludo*1 said:

    I'm not registered on the SI forums and didn't think it was worth registering on another forum for especially considering the head of Scottish research is a regular poster on here. That and I can just as easily not purchase the next few editions of the game until there is a genuine leap forward instead of just a squad update. They can't even seem to get right without making a whole host of errors on the basics such as that and an atrocious match engine.

    And finally, posting a complaint about a game on a forum doesn't make one seething - even if I've repeated the issue I have.

    TBF I’m not a regular poster here by any means; I’m very active around release and especially the beta, and that’s when you’re most likely to get a response from me on stuff, as @RandomGuy and others got last year when he reported some issues.

    i can only change what I know about, and looking at the thread from last year, nobody mentioned a Scottish Cup issue during the beta release period.

    What exactly is the issue with the Scottish Cup?

    On the other thing, player pictures are done out with the research team; these issues often happen at the SPFL.

  12. 1 minute ago, RandomGuy. said:

    I'd hold off on any long term saves just now, fwiw. The "Determination", "Consistency" and "Important matches" attributes are all defaulted to "1" if it's not been set to a number in the database. 

    Phil Foden the biggest player affected, but the vast majority of younger players in Scotland, maybe even lower league players, will also be hit with this. Means they'll struggle to ever develop, and also struggle to ever hit form. It also seems to affect refs who havent had numbers set, as theres a huge amount of penalties getting awarded.

    Has this been reported to SI?

  13. 1 minute ago, Lyle Lanley said:

    I see the real life SPFL fixtures aren't in the full game? 

    That would be a licensing thing. I'm not sure if that's intentional from the SPFL or not.

  14. Apologies to @RandomGuy. here.

    In amongst a load of Saints tweaks I had discussed with him, as an oversight on my part I didn't update Zander Clark's contract.

    I also hold my hands up for not including the updated work from my Hamilton researcher.

    Lots of edits with a short deadline and both are administrative cock-ups from me.

  15. 33 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

    Sorry for butting in, but every time I start a save with St Johnstone, you have a testimonial for Steven Anderson scheduled, despite his testimonial game being played two Summers ago.

    Murray Davidsons is also scheduled for the first Summer, but didnt happen this season in real life so should be the second Summer.

    I've gone back and added Anderson's real testimonial date so he won't get one in the game. I've added a hypothetical date of late July next year for Davidson.

    Please feel free to report any other issues as well.

  16. 27 minutes ago, Bring Back Paddy Flannery said:


     

     


    I assume that means the majority of teams will start with a budget of £0?

     

    A few clubs have enough wage budget to sign an additional player but that's about it.

  17. 5 hours ago, RandomGuy. said:

    @SGMilne is the boy to be moaning at.

    I've sorted it.

    For what it's worth I reckon the problem stems from his height being entered as 170cm and it not flagging up to me that that's 5'7 if I'm honest.

    But I have sorted it.

    I'd also like to make my usual point of order that you are all currently playing a beta, so expect changes before the game is released proper. Maybe wait until then to start full career games.

  18. On 10/28/2018 at 16:13, andylivi1 said:

    Strange they’ve not put Lamie as a wing back, and Keaghan as a winger rather than a midfielder, I helped Callum Carson with the positions, stats etc and both where listed as they should be a CB and LWB and Keags was listed as a MC or DM. 

    Sounds like they’ve completely ignored what we sent them :thumbsdown

    The way the process of research generally works is that I give out files for people to edit directly. They make the changes, I review them and I import them into the database.

    Having advertised for a Livingston researcher for now three (or possibly even four or five) years without any interest or uptake for it whatsoever, I asked Callum for his help, but he said he'd rather just answer my questions about Livi rather than edit the files etc himself.

    And that's fine, but it did mean that in amongst all the other things I was doing, it looks like I either missed some of the info he gave me in one of his emails or I made the changes in the Livi file and didn't re-enter it.

    Now fair enough, I will hold my hands up to that as he did e-mail it to me, but I get frustrated with the world of absolutes that you see on internet forums where the reaction is that I "completely ignored what 'we' sent them" (you yourself sent me nothing) as if consciously decided to omit that info.

    The beta was released two weeks ago, and in that time customers have had ample opportunity to report data issues in the appropriate place. We've acted upon as many of the issues raised in the Data Issues thread on the sigames forum as we could, but at some stage we can't make any further changes before the data is finalised for the game's release this week. For issues like that, time has run out.

    Had @RandomGuy. not tagged me in this, I would never have seen it, and once again - as it probably has been for the last number of years - it would have gone unreported that Jacobs's position was wrong.

    Oh, but for what it's worth, Callum listed Jacobs as primarily an AMC in the list of positions he sent me.

×
×
  • Create New...