Jump to content

Itwiznaeme

Gold Members
  • Posts

    793
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by Itwiznaeme

  1. Sorry, I think I didn't put my point across correctly here. I mean the finance that it brings to the higher ups, like Doncaster etc. They must get a share of the TV profits, and they get bigger money. They devour our money and have no respect for us. They realise if Rangers go, they earn less. But if they got rid of them and Celtic went too (no disrespect to their supporters or team) they SPL would be so competitive and would attract many more fans back through the doors. I am sure of this, as anyone could win any game.

    Thanks for clearing that up MC, fair points you are making about Doncaster, Ogilvie, etc...who all have a lot to lose financially as you say.

  2. So that's what my posts look like ... :lol::lol::lol::lol:

    I know it aint easy brother Dhen to not let yourself be pulled into their traps hence the reason why i have put around 14-15 of the trolling cnuts on ignore during the last week or two. You will probably notice that i haven't been posting much recently, i's because i've been busy hunting them down 1 by 1 and LIQUIDISING the bluenosed fcukers before the Big Liquidation appears. dry.giflaugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

    ...i will take them all off on the Big Liquidation day as i don't want to miss out on the celebrations in full.

  3. The pessimist/realist in me agrees, but surely we can see the glass half-full for a while.

    Without rangers, the league has immediately become more competitive. Their business partners aren't that far in front of the rest - witness the Saints' result recently. Oh, and County, and Hibs.....

    There isn't much doubt that celtic will win this title, and probably a couple or so more, but given time I feel there could well be realistic challenges from several sides. Also, celtic won't win everything, and a couple of cup wins should do wonders for any side's attendances.

    The question for me is, where are celtic going to go from here? They will never have the financial clout to challenge in Europe again, and even their glory-hunting hordes would get bored after a few years if they outspent the rest to dominate their domestic rivals. Titles wouldn't be tainted, but they would be devalued, knowing the resources available. If they have any kind of foresight, they should be talking NOW about revenue sharing, and some kind of approach like the NFL where a pseudo-handicap operates. If not, then Scots football could well die on its arse.

    And rangers? In common with celtic, how much money did they ever bring into the game? And where did the majority of it end up? The rest of Scots football were expected to be happy with the scraps from the big boys table. Well, if we want the game to thrive, that attitude HAS to change, and change NOW.

    Remember, no matter how big the Ugly Sisters were, they still needed someone to play.

    You make fair points, especially in regards to sharing of revenue, which i agree with to some extent. How it can be done fairly for all i don't know, that is for others to consider. Would i be correct in saying that up until David Murray arrived on the scene of Scottish football, Income from attendances for all domestic league matches (and not cup matches) was shared between all clubs (with the exception of income from the main stands at all grounds) or something similar?

  4. Rangers will never be gone. I wish they would as it would probably inspire Celtic to move on and would create a very competitive league. I mean, there are only 3 points between us and the leaders, and we are seventh! Everyone could take points off of everyone!

    I really wish they would go, but due to the powers that be and the finance they bring, they will always be back in some shape or form.

    Eh?!...

    1) They already are gone. Only 'The Tribute Club' remains.

    The only people who ever benefited significantly financially from Rangers were players (mostly foreigners), managers and directors of Rangers, clubs outside Scotland who they paid the biggest transfer fees to, UEFA from fines due to their sectarian riotous fans, lawyers fom fees, banks with interest for loans, administrators fees and the yellow journalists who ate their succulent lamb and printed what Rangers told them to print. wink.gif

    2) Serious question which i would like answered by anyone who is capable of and would like to answer intelligently;

    What "finance" did the dead (LIQUIDATION IMMINENT) tax dodging, (for at least the last 12 years) cheating b*****ds (fielding ineligible players for at least the last 12 years) bring to Scotland or Scottish football?

    9.bukowski-e1297857267360-700x569.jpeg

  5. realview.jpg?urbanimage_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbandictionary.com%2Fproducts.image.php%3Fdefid%3D5965997%26height%3D150%26width%3D200&urbanword_txt=Self-deluded+indignation

    It's all in your post, you have a problem with posters being openly gay, behind closed doors is a thing of the past and if you don't like it my homophobic little friend then thats your problem.

    Not to mention the discriminatory words for gays that you seem to find accpetable.

    so i suggest you stop playing the bigotry card at every turn if you want me to stop pulling you up for this.

    Absolutely nothing homophobic about it .. I simply now know it annoys you Brenda .. you're the one that kept disrespecting people ... So why should I worry about paying you any sort of respect to you or to your sexual preferences .. (really could not give a crap whether you are or are not Bennett as it's simply of no concern to me ).

    If you don't like your preferences being a subject on here Bennett then maybe you should consider not using camp innuendo and also talking about people wanking themselves into a frenzy .. Hey I'm a big boy (no pun intended :lol: ) so I laughed it off ... what men do BennyBhoy ..

    So I'll give you a clue here Brenda .. treat others with respect and you might find it returned ...

    Otherwise do me a favour you big Jessie, take your indignation and jog on ... :P;)

    Telt AGAIN! wink.gif

  6. .... Orcs wtf are they like ... :lol::lol::lol:

    Those of them who post in The Pie Shop are mostly as thick as manure and only less than half as useful, hence the reason why i have most of them, if not all yet, on my ignore list so as i don't have to see their deluded bigoted biased troll posts. I seriously doubt that you could trust any of them to suck butter from your ass no matter how much you payed them. wink.gif

  7. They should have been thrown out of Scottish football in the summer - what a wasted opportunity.

    I seriously doubt that anyone with scruples today who now knows even half of the full extent to which the unscrupulous Rangers had been cheating (fielding ineligible players for over a decade), racking up unsustainable debts, and not paying its financial dues, debts and taxes will disagree with you. The only persons who would disagree with you are cheats or/& bigots and ignorant deluded fools just as many of those who ran/run and played for the old and new Rangers are and always have been.

    Shyster controlled corporate media outlets in Scotland and those employed by shysters who were/are worried about losing their jobs as yellow journalists are the one and only entity that saved the cheating b*****ds from being thrown out of Scottish football for ever.

  8. For those not familiar with HMRC phoenix company reporting. We now have all three, so it should instigate a further HMRC probe at least.

    http://www.hmrc.gov....ual/ins1121.htm

    Setting the 'phoenix' signal

    Successor companies are highlighted on BROCS and IDMS by the setting of the phoenix signal.

    The signal is set on the BROCS record by the Recovery Office only if all the criteria below are met.

    An associated Insolvency Compliance Unit (ICU) or office involved in similar work will generally identify successor companies which meet the criteria and ask the Recovery Office to set the signal.

    The criteria for setting the signal are

    • one or more directors (including shadow directors) who are common to both the liquidated company and the successor company, and
    • there was Revenue debt of £10,000 or more (actual or estimated) in respect of the liquidated company, and
    • the same trade or business is carried on by the successor company.

    Does it mention anything about potential money laundering of money gained through tax dodging and ripping off over 300 other creditors on the HMRC website? Just asking. dry.gif

  9. The really fun thing today is that Ally McCoist is in the papers urging everyone to forget the legal shenanigans and focus on the football.

    Meanwhile, Charles Green is telling everyone to focus on title stripping. Why? Because he wants to make money, and he knows he'll make none if the fans "focus on the football", because the football is sh*te quality.

    Credit to Green - When he arrived, he said loud and clear that he was here to make a load of money and cash out. Quite right too, since he's a businessman.

    In the meantime, he's size up the Old Rangers support and spotted that what they love more than anything is pandering, loony-tunes nonsense about how awesome they are and the terrible evil of their enemies.

    I mean, seriously. Does anyone on P&B honestly believe that Green gives a damn about Old Rangers' history and titles?

    Title stripping costs him nothing. Financial penalties, on the other hand...

    If the inquiry results in the loss of trophies, expect a lot of noise out of Ibrox and nothing else.

    Green isn't going to waste a penny on legal fees to win back awards he couldn't give a flying f*ck about.

    And the Rangers fans? I'd love a chance to sell these gullible muppets London Bridge.

    They really will swallow, swallow anything, provided it's sold by the right bajillionaire with wealth off the scale.

    Green is going to enjoy retiring somewhere hot to live off the fruits of their stupidity.

    Spot on. dry.gif

×
×
  • Create New...