As We Rise Again
-
Posts
591 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by As We Rise Again
-
-
Vision.
0 -
Hello There,
Just wondering how a club that is allegedly losing one million a month can sustain these losses? I know Rangers are big club, large support and certain commercial deals but I have feeling even these are not enough to cover this? It vex's me thus that this has not been asked by the peeps in the press?
This has been explained a million times on here now and frankly I'm not repeating it again.
-2 -
A bit off topic regarding Administration / Liquidation, eh?
So? Have you got a point?
-1 -
Ask Hellboy, he'll either know or make it up.
My view/guess is bring in a couple of steady defenders and maybe that young QoS striker and go with that.
From Midfield to attack we're alright, it's just defenders we really need and we'll be solid next season.
-3 -
has happened to me before. I think it has something to do with them paying for followers
I was wondering what it was, I thought I got hacked or something, it was just these random people with thousands of followers.
0 -
It was a cunning plan hatched by both the SPL & SFA to somehow separate the players and staff from the management and place any blame on the management but phrase the management as the company
and the players as the club 
.SFA licences cannot be sold to another company and in 2011 they changed their rules & regulations that a licence cannot be transferred to another company or legal entity to only the association can do this as they see fit.The club is dead as far as the law of the land is concerned and died of insolvency.
The club on the other hand as far as the associations are concerned is who they see fit to give a dead clubs licence too to give credence that's it's the same club because that SFA licence says so and has been rewritten for a change of company so they would have us believe.
It's all an elaborate lie that has legal protection because the associations can make up any rules they like especially when it comes to Rangers to keep the cash cow alive in it's original form.
You're saying that the club is dead etc but you'll happily talk about it every single day for hours and hours. You've got a screw loose pal.
-1 -
I repeat: "Rangers did not gain any unfair competitive advantage and none of the players were ineligible to play" because they weren't caught gaining an unfair advantage and playing ineligable players at the time when they were gaining an unfair advantage and playing ineligible players".
That's true. That's what the Commission found.
You got off with cheating, because you weren't caught cheating while you were cheating.
That's Lord Nimmo Smith's judgement.
It's not up for dispute.
What if's etc etc blah blah blah.
-1 -
Woeful.
ETA: And totally embarrassing.
Spacker.
-2 -
Sorry but if you're going to base Norman on someone from Corrie, it has to be Roy.
He's certainly as weird as him.
0 -
And there we have the infallibility of yer LNS. The FTTT found rangers liable in many cases, and rangers didn't even contest others. Only in a minority of cases (those where rangers had failed to provide full documentation) did the FTTT not rule the club liable. So the SPL commission based its findings on total bollox, did they?
As para 104 is demonstrably based on a falsehood, paras 105 and 106 fall by default.
Well done for pointing out my mistake by exposing an even bigger one in LNS's whitewash.
Strangely enough, if rangers had been in any way innocent or honest in this whole sorry and shameful process, there would be no need for the endless twisting and contortion of legal loopholes and technicalities. Even the infallible cornerstones of your arguments contradict and misinterpret each other.
Norris, you're a boring old c**t. Just thought I would tell you that.
-3 -
By GAVIN McCAFFERTY
Published on 09/05/2013 23:26
The struggle for power at Ibrox has intensified after Greenock businessmen James and Sandy Easdale outlined their intention to secure a boardroom presence as they continue to buy up shares.
• James and Sandy Easdale to buy more Rangers shares as duo seek ‘voice’ in mmanagement of club affairs
• Greenock brothers have made their fortune running bus firm McGills
The pair, whose business interests include bus firm McGill’s, are in line to buy Charles Green’s eight per cent shareholding when the former chief executive is free to sell under stock market rules later in the year.
The brothers have already invested in the club and revealed they were in talks to further strengthen their stake – and in doing so they want a significant say in financial decisions at Ibrox.
There has been a major shift in power in recent weeks following Green’s resignation and the departure of his business partner Imran Ahmad, while chairman Malcolm Murray reportedly lost a vote of confidence earlier this week.
The Easdale brothers are looking to step into the breach. In a joint interview with BBC Scotland, Sandy Easdale confirmed they were actively looking to increase their stake. He said: “The interest started about seven months ago and we bought into Charles and his dream for the future for Rangers. We have a delicate deal that when shares are available, we will purchase them. Other shares are an option to us and that is growing stronger. Every day we have some more negotiations with other parties.”
And the brothers made it clear they want some influence in return for their money.
James Easdale said: “Certainly, when you are spending that amount of money, a seat on the board would be nice. I think it would be unreasonable to think you wouldn’t like a say in any business that you invest such a large amount in. Control? Let’s wait and see. A presence on the board is something we would be seeking in the mid-term.”
Sandy Easdale added: “I think complete control would be a far, far distant place. I think somebody needs complete control at Ibrox. I don’t know if that’s where we want to be. We are quite willing to share Ibrox with people who want to do the job, do it properly and
support Rangers as a club.”
Sandy Easdale made clear their opinion that manager Ally McCoist and director Walter Smith should have a central role in helping the club progress.
He also called for people to move on from his conviction and imprisonment for VAT fraud.
“It’s not something I like going over and dwelling on,” he said. “It was 1996. To cast up 17 years ago seems a wee bit silly when everybody else has moved on.”
We already know, you're a bit late with the news. You must be a fan of the daily rebel.
0 -
Enrico when you stop licking other posters arses I'll begin to take you seriously.
-1 -
The guy is a complete raging bigot. You are really wasting your time with that hate filled nothing.
Honestly this thread has gone downhill and all that are left are the real dregs of the Ps & Ds.
That's why no Rangers fan even tries to have a discussion with them anymore, they're absolute twats and will only want to talk about stuff if it's anti-Rangers.
0 -
Still trying to defend Green's comments, this is almost as bad as you thinking celebrating child abuse is ok
Do you defend the Tartan army on racism and homophobic chants? Or don't you care Paddy.
0 -
No. If Charles had said my little friend here from Pakistan nothing would have been made of it. Instead he used the epithet P**i and he used it first showing that he though of Imran first as a P**i before he thought of him as a friend.
I'm only a few years younger than Charles and I cant remember a time when that was acceptable in Britain. I can remember when it was much more common, but dont confuse that with being accepted.
Absolute bullshit to be fair. If you had a friend who was English would you have a banter with him and call him the likes of an English c**t etc? I've got a mate who came from England and spoke in an English accent and I had a banter with him about it, he didn't take offence. Is there much difference in that? Do you go to Scotland games? Do you complain about the English racism from the tartan army? Or what about the homophobic chants?
0 -
Either is correct, and I used that one deliberately.
Sure you did petal.
0 -
I cant take anyone seriously who thinks using "your" instead of "you're" is a spelling mistake rather than a grammatical error. He used the wrong word, but at least he spelled it correctly.
Spelt it correctly not spelled. Are you an American?
0 -
The Easdales go public. They were interviewed on a bus
:lol: You stay classy sevco 
I doubt it will come to anything. I think they are only worth £6M. How on earth would they buy out everyone with that plus invest in Rangers? Seriously now fs.
0 -
I almost believe in some Machiavellian way he meant to say it. A reason to leave before he said he would. I have no idea why he would want to engineer that but it was the most obvious of terminal PR gaffs.
Anyone who has done any interviews or even watched a bit of telly knows you don't say some things, or even invite comment on certain issues. Regardless of intent, between friends racist or not racist doesn't matter. He might as well have got his knob out or punched a kitten.
What a lot of tosh. You are probably one of the people who think he has something to do with Whyte, now that's looking less likely you're using a shite thing like that.
0 -
Arse. Door. Way out etc.
It isn't just the one way out with you is it........
0 -
I think there's something wrong with my twitter. Every time I go on it's got me following these random people who I never even followed.
0 -
If it was a private wee joke with a close friend, nobody would care, largely because nobody would know.
Using that term in any sort of outside company at all would be loaded and damaging however.
Using it - in a needless attempt to justify its use - in a newspaper interview, made sure the damage was irrevocable.
I'm not agreeing with it whatsoever, like I said he would have been better off not saying anything at all. But as usual in Scotland everything gets blown out of proportion.
Do you troll Twitter too? Nice work.
Nah, it was one of the G&G's trolling Rangers twitter account actually. I bet it was you Henrik.
0 -
******** no whit ur blocked cos u r 2 thick and brainless u stupid *** c**t up the ra
One of the parts of a conversation I had with some green and grey hoops fan on twitter after he commented on the Rangers official twitter.
What P&Ber was it. He has similar vocabulary to most on here.
0 -
We've already had this discussion AWRA.
The argument wasn't about what motivated the remark, or even how Ahmad received it. The problem was that Green made the comment in a newspaper interview in order to try and establish that the world had gone mad in frowning upon such things. He used language that many would genuinely find offensive, in order to make a wider point that many would genuinely find offensive.
I'm being serious when I say that Ahmad's personal views barely come into it.
I know where you're coming from by saying it's because he gave the interview to a newspaper and said what he did. But I doubt anyone would be different whether they found out he said it to the media or in a conversation with Imran. It would still be the same reaction.
0
and the players as the club 
.SFA licences cannot be sold to another company and in 2011 they changed their rules & regulations that a licence cannot be transferred to another company or legal entity to only the association can do this as they see fit.
Annoying things people write on Facebook
in Top Fives
Posted · Edited by As We Rise Again
The attention seekers who write "if we don't talk delete me" it really does annoy me. 1. I've got over a thousand people on my list it's a bit hard to talk to every person on it and 2. They can delete people their selves without the need to broadcast it for attention.