Jump to content

Orainn

Banned
  • Posts

    69
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Orainn

  1. Wow. You really are particularly stupid. Now, can you stop trolling and answer the questions? Or leave it somebody with the capacity for abstract thought.

    Can you stop being angry about nothing and insulting me? Are you able to make single post that doesn't paint you out as a negative person? Can you last an hour without checking your reputation?(no)

    And for your information, Deb is a fantastic and humorous character, and Jennifer Carpenter is a very, very good actress.

  2. Whatever you say, you tit.

    And there's no moaning, or complaining. Just asking, you silly little bigot. Way to miss the point completely.

    Stop being angry please.

    You moaned about a characters personality. You moaned about the writing. You criticised David Zayas' acting. So you definitely did moan, and you definitely did criticize. After watching 1, yes ONE episode. Because that's the sort of dingy personality you are.

    How did you even know I red dotted you? You must take regular checks of your reputation. Hourly ones. How embarrassing for you. :lol:

  3. Watching series 1 episode 1. Does his sister get any less annoying, and does anyone in this entire show actually look like they actually do their job? Also, does the guy in the porkpie hat learn to act?

    Cheers for the red dot, troll.

    I red dotted you because you're moaning about and criticising really minor issues of a TV show after watching 1, yes ONE, episode. Unbelievably pathetic.

    I'm going to do it more often if it causes you come back an hour later and make a tear-stained edit. The definition of "bovverd" IMO.

  4. The difficulty with the football one was not knowing whether or not the teams were in the top flight. I went with Maritimo, Leiria(they're in the 3rd tier :ph34r: ) and Eintracht Frankfurt.

    Surprised Maritimo wasn't pointless tbh. Who the f**k has heard of Maritimo, but not Hannover, Hofffenheim or Mainz? :huh:

  5. I use Palmers Cocoa Body Butter cream. I don't know how much it costs because I have so much money I don't even look at the price tage for anything, unless I'm booking a holiday or something with my friends who are all poor and most of them don't even know their dad. What does matter is that this product is V. dece, as it re-hydrates your skin, and makes you smell nice. So it's probably quite expensive. #laughingtothebanklikehahaha #money #reemappeal

    They say you're only as rich as the as the money you spend without looking at the price tag. The last Club DECE nightout I came home melted and went on the internet and bought a gaming laptop from Alienware for a laugh. Fortunately I'm well off and I could afford it. #herecomesthemoney

    edit: I already have 2 btw, so if anyone wants it let me know.

  6. Indeed, having one specific thread for a club which all news goes into is shite. The threads are generally boring as f**k and when something that is actually worth talking about comes around, it gets lost amongst the tedious crap. For example, the Thomson and Willis ferret incident was only discussed within the Dunfermline thread last season, surrounded by stuff no one other than Dunfermline fans could care much about, instead of getting a dedicated thread where it could have had great potential for hilarity.

    If something's worth talking about it'll get it's own thread, don't see why we can't put all signing news into the dedicated divisional thread.

    Agreed. The First Division forum is hideously boring at the minute, all thanks to these awful club pages. They take up 6 of the top 8 threads at the minute. Ridiculous.

  7. Murray's performance record in the Masters and French Open has been greatly helped by his seeding. The others listed would also have done as well as him with his seeding. It was you that brought up performance record as a gauge to how good a player is on that surface. Now you are stating that title wins are not relevant, but quarter final and semi final places are? However what we both agreed on was Murray was not in the top eight clay court players. if a hypothetical seeding system occurred based on how good a player was on each surface Murray would find it extremely difficult to replicate his previous results. I have made my points, you have made yours. I won't comment any further.

    I certainly under estimated how well Youhzny is playing this season. His results the past three months have been better than he has played before. He has taken the first set against Federer and his serve is looking good. Interestingly enough that is only the fourth set Youhzny has ever taken from Federer in 15 meetings. Sets him nicely for Wimbledon.

    Of they aren't relevant, why would they be if Murray hasn't played ever played in any similar tournaments? :unsure2: You could count on one hand the number of 250 and 500 clay events Murray has played in the past 5 years, if not his entire career. You'd have to be absolutely mental to believe he wouldn't have as many clay titles if he'd played the amount of events(The sort of events that have John Isner as top seed, and Albert Ramos and Denis Istomin seeded 8th.) Alamgro has. Tournaments that both players, and indeed everybody else on the tour, play - The French Open and three masters - will always be more relevant. There is no parameter by which Alamgro can claim to be better than Murray on clay. He can claim to be, at absolute best, on par with him.

    When Almagro or Monaco plays as well as this against Djokovic(37 game winning streak Djokovic) or Nadal, rather than getting absolutely destroyed as he always does, we can reopen this debate.

  8. But Almagro has beaten Murray at Roland Garros. Hypothetically we could agree on eight of the players being better than Murray. If Murray was to be seeded ninth, he would not make a semi final (unless other seeds fell) and would find it difficult to make a quarter final. Being seeded has helped Murray's results in clay court tournaments. The other guys can run in to Federer, Nadal and Djokovic in the last 16 and never make semis or quarters. Advancing in tournaments doesn't always equate to being better at Tennis.

    Murray is now on court and it is still on serve in the first set. Both players looking to attack from the off.

    Yeh, but that was one meeting 5 years ago and Murray's 2nd ever French Open. I wouldn't say that was relevant when discussing who is better. Comparing their tournament and match records is about as well as you can do.

  9. He is helped dramatically by his seeding. But he deserves that as he has worked hard all year round to get that seeding. Personally if Murray was to face Federer, Djokovic, Nadal, Ferrer, Berdych,,Tsonga, Del Potro, Wawrinka, Almagro and Monaco on clay he would lose more than he would win on clay. I would happily say those ten are better than Murray on clay. When Murray made the semi finals at the French he had a very favourable draw.

    Federer, Djokovic and Nadal are a given. I'd agree about the next 5 but obviously to a much lesser extent.

    I definitely disagree about Almagro and Monaco. Especially Monaco, who is the most overrated clay specialist out there. For all the tournaments and matches they play, do they ever beat any of the top players? As far as I can see, Almagro hasn't beaten a seeded player at Rome, Monte Carlo or Madrid since 2010.

  10. As for seperate seedings I think it would be unfair on tennis players that have worked hard all year to lose their ranking to someone like Hewitt who wildcards into events he fancies playing. If you did that where would you rank Andy Murray for the French? Top 20? I could easily name ten better players than him on clay. I don't think he deserves to be seeded less than four for the French. The only thing I would maybe allow, is the top four to be juggled, 5-8 be juggled, 9-16 be juggled and 17-32 to be juggled on form on that surface.

    I wasn't in any way suggesting it, just emphasizing how good I think Hewitt is on grass.

    Although I think your being extremely harsh on Murray, he is definitely one of the 10 best players on clay. Are there 10 players that can better 1 semi and 2 quarters at Roland Garros as well as 3 semis and 4 quarters at masters level? Extremely doubtful. People underplay his ability on clay. The only reason he doesn't have any titles on it is because he only plays 4 tournaments a year. He'd have a decent number if he played all the events Almagro and his likes play year round.

  11. Hewitt should trouble Del Potro. He's still a really good grass court player. Only Tsonga, Federer, Djokovic, Roddick, Soderling and Baghdatis have beaten him at Wimbledon since 2003. I'd definitely have him seeded if I were asked to pick the Wimbledon seedings regardless of ranking. Probably in the top 20's actually

    edit: I might do those seedings actually, just for fun. :ph34r:

  12. I need to cancel a gym membership(direct debit), but missed the last payment of it as I have no money in my account. Can I stop the direct debit and still owe the money, or do I need to pay the outstanding fee first?

    This is all asuming that it's actually possible to cancel gym memberships at the bank. :unsure:

  13. Yeah because I don't believe that are any massive plotholes or inaccuracies, nothing that ruined the movie for me. Ye know, other than stuff of that ilk. It's a world where there's other realms, god-like beings, a guy who turns into a giant green monster and a bunch of other obviously fictitious stuff.

    I don't think any film should be exempt from criticism because its in a specific genre but nor do you apply the rules of this world (and its technology) to every genre in the same way.

    Why did the Hulk suddenly go from some uncontrollable beast, to a pet guard dog? Do you not consider that a massive plothole, considering his change was very instrumental in the outcome of the film?

×
×
  • Create New...