Jump to content

Pete's Frontier

Banned
  • Posts

    932
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Pete's Frontier

  1. Yup

    Under the electoral system that gives your rocket queen and IFS dodging numpty a large majority in Holyrood, UKIP would be in a coalition with the Conservatives and possibly the DUP. Put that in your mangy sporran.

  2. Nigel is a straight talker, something completely gone from the political scene since the Blair consensus, and he's a man that's bore the brunt of threats to him and his family, many of them from extremists up here as we saw in the Royal Mile a couple of years back. I include Salmond in that list of shame as he refused to condemn the thugs who descended on him that day. Scotland, always a parochial place, and deeply anti English in many quarters. Let's not kid ourselves that the SNP don't ride on that sentiment. Is it racist? Yes, by Blair consensus standards it is.

  3. African emigrants are fleeing their homelands because of the awful poverty under which they're forced to live. These conditions have been brought on by British/European colonialism and the Atlantic Slave Trade which has left Africa heavily underdeveloped and in unpayable debt to the very people who forced these atrocious circumstances upon them in the first place. The least European countries can do is offer a better life to the victims of their own racism and economic exploitation, as opposed to sending them back to a life of abject misery and horrendous penury.

    Why should the lives of Iraqi and Syrian Christians take precedent over their similarly at risk Muslim countrymen and women? Your and Nigel's view on that is disgustingly bigoted yet highly unsurprising considering your mutual support for a vilely racist and sectarian political party.

    Lectured by a Rangers fan on bigotry, are you serious? Your unlettered post is clueless, blaming colonialism and the Western slave trade that ended in the early 1800's for the thousands now in the Med. Okay colonialism exploited the resources of these regions, but it also brought civilisation in the form of basic literacy, sanitation, medicines roads and infrastructure - all the things that allowed the black African populations to explode in numbers to the point we are at today. It also established countries where only tribal boundaries had existed. And your ignorance is displayed again by failing to mention the Arab slave trade that was far bigger and longer than the Western one. These people are fleeing stable poor countries for the most, demonstrated by the fact they have large sums to pay the traffickers. Asylum is for persecution and threat of death, not because of access to free benefits. And on that point you are clueless again about the persecution of Christians in Muslim countries. These are the genuinely persecuted people as we've even seen on the migrant boats. And how dare you slander UKIP, you are a fool fan of a vile and racist football club.

  4. After failing to beat Falkirk at the asbestos dome today we can now see the end of Sevco in sight. The stenographers are feeding the people moonbeams about McCall having a warchest and dossier (lol) to keep them on board, but the reality is insolvency will be assured when they fail to go up. Then we'll see the feeding on the corpse by Big Mike and the three blind mice will get burned. GASL will not fund the 10-15m needed to keep the lights on, there is no credit line, no listing, no chance. :thumbsdown:thumsup2

  5. They'll be surprised when these Christians aren't white and want to send them home too :(

    UKIP have black and ethnic minority members and spokesman, so save your cheap smears. The only group that concerns me is political Islam: people who have no desire to accept democracy, freedom, British culture, want to impose Sharia. I would let them all go to IS.

  6. Would that be before or after we leave the EU?

    That's up to the British people to vote in a referendum, the referendum that the undemocratic Edna and Ms Sturgeon want to deprive us of despite the public demand for it, including in Scotland.

  7. Do they have enough points to get in though?

    Australia and Canada have points systems but still take in asylum from those at genuine risk of persecution..The problem is these people in the boats are for the most not fleeing IS or brutality, they are West and East African economic illegals. They are also largely Muslim and capable of murder as we saw last week, but fleeing poverty is not grounds for asylum. Britain has the highest per capita foreign aid budget in the world for poverty overseas.

  8. Nigel spot on regards the sea of African migrants in the Med caused by Cameron and Sarkozy. Colonel Gaddafi was a brutal dictator but he'd come to terms with the west and kept the Islamist fanatics in check as well as the migrant boats. Cameron lied to the UN about humanitarian air strikes that quickly became a regime removal operation, as warned by Putin. Now we have chaos and IS filling the Mediterranean sea with migrants. I also agree with NIgel that the eu should house more Christians who are at risk of slaughter from Muslims. All Syrian and Iraq Christians should be offered eu asylum.

  9. The gap is 125

    Except Scotland contributes far more to the exchequer than Wales does. Indeed, it contributes more than the UK average per head of population. Add these facts to the geographical make-up of Scotland and that is the reason why there is higher public spending - not because of "English subsidies". England cannot afford to subsidise a fucking thing, you utter clownshoe.

    Thanks for playing anyway

    You are full of it , just like your new outfit per day heroine. 25bn raised, given 32bn by Westminster. Oil price down 50%. 7bn to be raised by tax rises and loans by Sturgeon.

    Thanks for being a sheep.

  10. And what tax do they each contribute?

    Scotland. 7.2bn less than the Barnett formula and with oil 50% down... do the effin math.

    And England gets £8,529 per head, almost £2k less. Just think about that and let the cogs turn in your head for a second: they have to pay for higher education fees, prescriptions, their NHS is a far worse state, housing in many areas unobtainable. This is what Sturgeon is going to lead us to. We are getting a good deal from England ffs, better than their people get and they bear the brunt of the migration.

  11. That article doesn't mention an EU vote.

    BBC poll last week, 6.1 out of 10 want eu vote, over 1000 polled. Only 4.0 give a shit about trident that Sturgeon is pathological about.

  12. I think you may just be Coburn. Your ignorance of politics in the UK is very similar.

    As an example - get rid of Barnett and get funded the same way as Wales. What is the name of the method used to fund Wales? (As a clue, the name starts with B and ends in T.) :rolleyes:

    Wales gets £9709 per head and Scotland £10,152. Those are the figures. Scotland gets more..

    Your own ignorance is telling, you're another sheep.

  13. Lol

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-31800374

    Most want immigration reduced and an eu vote, idiot.

    And the only threat to the Barnett formula is Sturgeon, not Coburn. She is the anti Scottish candidate, a liar to boot as she won't admit what it will cost ordinary Scots by grabbing fiscal powers and losing the 32 billion from Westminster, her and her party are leading us to ruin.

  14. Just watched both the Coburn and Harvie interviews on STV player - what a difference between them. Almost tempted to vote green whilst laughing at how much Coburn seems to actually hate Scotland.

    Your evidence for Coburn hating Scotland is UKIP's policy to ditch the Barnett formula and treat Scotland on par with Wales? I.E fairly. Most of what Coburn says is what most Scots agree with but are afraid or conditioned to vote against - cutting migration and eu vote especially.

  15. Libtards. :lol:

    Was going to engage for s minute there but then I remembered you're either

    a)Trolling

    Or

    b) A complete thicko

    So probably not worth the effort.

    yeah, best back away if you want to keep those easily shattered comfort blanket delusions intact, deluded liberals like you are easy meat.

  16. What is there to learn about UKIP that we don't know already? :huh:

    UKIP's nonsensical raison d'etre would destroy the Scottish economy, that's pretty much all we need to know.

    Bound to be some good point and laugh material whenever that corpulent, xenophobic toad Coburn is getting interviewed, nothing to do with the interviewer.

    I think a party that is polling 15% nationally (it's a UK election) deserves a fair hearing and not a hatchet job from overpaid mainstream media liberals, or is that too much to ask? The nonsensical prize is all yours given 6.8/10 Scots agree with Nige on immigration and 6.1 out of ten want an eu vote, all your wee reformed trade unionist nats and progressive libtards need to grasp that.

  17. I will be interviewed by Bernard Ponsonby on STV - Scotland Tonight programme tomorrow 22:30hrs - http://t.co/2zZ80VYCCM

    David Coburn, not me.

    I hope he has a fair crack, didn't get one from Sarah Smith on BBC, just did her best to belittle him, the public learned nothing about UKIP except rehashed garbage.

  18. Where's the dough for April's payroll coming from? :1eye Unless somebody digs deep Sevco are surely going to run out cash and fold up whether or not they get promoted. They needed MASH's second £5m to keep the lights on until the season book money came in, Park's 1.5m was just one month's expenses. No credit line, delisted, no auditor, and the absent GASL full of horse manure. :thumsup2

  19. This whole policy is predicated on needing immigrants to only carry out skilled jobs. How many pakistani, bangladeshi and other former colonial citizens have come to this country and worked their butts off in unskilled positions only to use the money earned to start a business. How will any points system accommodate these people?

    You need to get a basic grip of the problems. Immigrants are not the problem as proven by the various analysis of their contribution to the country. If we want to stop people from travelling here to access the health or benefit systems then tackle this access rather than try to limit who can actually get into the country.

    Non EEA have cost us £120bn since 1997, 10% of the national debt, so don't kid us that Pakistani and Bangladeshis have made a huge contribution, just is not true. The social problems in England are immense with this community, which is a large part of the bill. This is aside from the Rotherhams and Rochdales.

×
×
  • Create New...