Jump to content

Janne Lindberg's Laces

Gold Members
  • Posts

    105
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Janne Lindberg's Laces

  1. 2 hours ago, mcginns said:

    There's no doubting Morton are a Dougie Imrie team...time wasting, falling over, moaning at the ref...it's like watching Billy Reid's Hamilton side with different coloured hoops.

    This is some laugh. Brian Graham was practically man marking the referee and Bannigan was following him about being his back ups. I don't think I saw any time wasting from either team during the game and when Morton players fell over it was usually because they'd been blootered up in the air. 

    Undoubtedly a game ruined by a referee.

  2. 1 hour ago, madton said:

    Love how Ferguson said the long throw is "their style"- it's Strapps first start in nearly a year ya big fanny!

     

    Other than that comment I think he sees what we all said, which was Inverness weren't very good and Morton made it hard for them to play. Which is exactly our style and we're ok with it. Unlike some other managers in the league, past and present, he's not complained about Morton being overly physical when making it hard for them.

    If Inverness' good run was based on the performances of Wotherspoon and he was marked out the game so easily last night, it could be a long rest of the season.

    32 minutes ago, bdu98196 said:

    Another Dodds error. He should never have left, rather have George than any other forward we have in our team except Billy, as shown the type of player who gets goals at this level with the right service and game time, something I don't think samuels or lodivica will ever do.

    He's not likely to be absolutely prolific but if he's used in a team playing to his strengths then George is a great striker for this level. That's two excellent finishes in two games and I'm very glad we've got him. I'd certainly rather have him leading the line than a number of other strikers in the division.

  3. 19 minutes ago, Dunning1874 said:

    Bold team selection and so far it's worked. The right hand side remains a concern defensively with French continuing to be a total bombscare and Blues being narrow and on a booking in front of him, that's where any clear Inverness chances have started, but the plan to make the midfield as energetic as possible has worked. The pressing really has Inverness rattled.

    We're so much better with Strapp on the left it's not funny. Wilson and Oakley have also been excellent.

    I didn't think I'd ever see a midfield with a pairing of Gillespie and Wilson described as energetic but you're quite right. Crawford seems to be back to his terrier best and getting quickly onto men too.

  4. 37 minutes ago, Chippyminton said:

    I thought so too. We're past masters at giving away soft goals towards the end of games, and the resilience was good to see. 

    Broadfoot had been fine (ducking one in the first half aside) but it's quite telling that we finished the game with (most of) our preferred centre backs, and a natural left back and right back all playing. Wilson and Blues as the midfield two also looked pretty comfortable and worked their socks off chasing and winning second balls.

     

    Generally a decent performance and a massive 3 points. Gillespie played as well as he has all season before he went off and there was the high press we became used to last season, especially in the second half. Boyd was very good at that in his time on the pitch today.

    Any word on what happened to Ricky Little, looked like a bad one with nobody near him?

  5. 14 minutes ago, #Gary said:

    No idea why we're pretending Iain Wilson isn't horseshit as well tbh.

    Probably because he's the least horseshit of our midfielders at the moment, and I include Crawford in that.

    Dougie is right to an extent, the players who got the plaudits last season aren't performing, but one of (if not the) reason for that is the signings he made during the summer have put big gaps in the team which are dragging everyone down.

    Michael Stewart called it correctly in his commentary that we were yards off Dunfermline and that there was no organisation to the press. We did have that last year Crawford was massively important in that, but he could do it because behind him there was some semblance of organisation and confidence in others to do their jobs. 

    Wilson and McGrattan should get an opportunity in the midfield next week, French shouldn't play at centre back, Power and/or Broadfoot need dropped because they're not up to the pace of the game and Imrie needs to decide if he's playing Oakley or Muirhead, because we can't press effectively with both of them with the team he's built this season. If not be adverse to a keeper change either, Mullen hasn't done anything wrong and while McDonald has generally been good so far, he's had a couple of poor moments over the last week.

    Bearne I think deserves more game time based on his showing last night but we don't have the liberty of carrying him until he gets up to speed. He might also turn out to be the kind of player who looks good for flashes in games and then disappears; see Boyd last night.

    Dunfermline, certainly in the first half, did everything right; quick passing, good movement, pressing when appropriate, tactically spot on, not afraid to shoot and should have had a penalty to likely be 0-3 up at half time.

  6.  

    23 minutes ago, Dave said:

    I don't know if I've ever seen a level of rattling quite like the Morton fans are displaying in this thread.

    I'd give Owen Coyle a 10 year* contract extension right now purely for the tears he causes amongst opposition fans.

     

    *Or until the money runs out, whichever comes first.

    Are we as Morton fans rattled or do we just not like the guy and recognise that he's not up to the standard he's made out to be by the media? He's allowed a team top of the league to absolutely chuck it over the last 6-8 weeks and hasn't figured out how to stop the rot. If that was the majority of other managers in the league(s) there would be serious questions asked. 

  7. 2 hours ago, SandyCromarty said:

    Bear in mind that Imrie spent the majority of his playing career with HA in the relegation end of the Premier fighting for survival.

    Not really sure what that's got to do with anything. His signings have been more hit than miss and mostly of good enough quality for the Championship.

    The issue most of us have is that Ali Crawford isn't delivering but keeps being selected. Yesterday was another example of where he looked good in flashes but nowhere near enough to justify a start, especially over someone like McGrattan who has been excellent all season.

    Miller isn't up to the standard.

  8. Riga for New Year 2020 was excellent. Big free party by the river (no tickets needed) with plenty of drinking and very chilled policing/stewards.

    Bloody freezing though and the beer/champagne/balsam induced hangover was rough but a trip to the beach on the Baltic (Jurmala) on New year's Day sorted that out.

  9. The 95/96 Morton team was full of guys who were much better than that level. Rajamaki caught the eye but Mahmood, McInnes and Lindberg were all tremendous footballers. Janne Lindberg was the pick of them for me, just a fantastic player.

    Elsewhere we've had a few players who've been very good but only been at the club for short spells, Paul Fenwick and Scott Paterson were both very classy defenders.

  10. 14 minutes ago, Peter LaFleur said:

    Morton’s defence strolled that tonight. Thought Fjortoft and Strapp in particular were the best on the park for me. Not sure how they perform on a regular basis but didn’t look to be your typical relegation fodder calamity defence. Blues, Salkeld and Muirhead were absolutely howling. 

    That's the season in a nutshell. Defensively sound, even more so when Mcginty hasn't been on to have a minimum of 1 bombscare moment per match, but we're garbage up front and the midfield falls somewhere between the two. 

  11. 2 hours ago, Dunning1874 said:

    You have to acknowledge that there's an unavoidable dilemma with the squad we've got and that's due to the terrible hand MacPherson has been dealt by Hopkin and McElhone, but he's still getting something less than the sum of its parts.

    There's an argument for teams who are weak defensively to play a back three as it ostensibly makes you more adept at shitfesting with an extra body in defence. This has worked for us in the past, eg in 18/19 when having two of McAlister/Waddell/Kilday either side of Buchanan made us less susceptible to pumpings. It isn't working this season, because this back three has McGinty in it who is much, much worse than any of those four and no defence he's in is going to grind out regular clean sheets. We could be playing an 8-1-1 and McGinty would contrive to give his man 5 yards of space from crosses, costing us goal after goal.

    The other issue is our weak as piss attacking options. None of them are good enough for this division regardless, but they're certainly not suited to playing as lone strikers. So as well as removing a midfielder to play the back three, MacPherson feels he needs to remove one to have two centre forwards as well, along with wanting Nesbitt playing just off the two strikers. It's been more of a 3-4-1-2 or 3-4-2-1 than 3-5-2, but adding numbers to both the defence and attack to try to compensate for how weak we are in personnel only serves to weaken us in the one area where we actually have solid Championship players.

    Jacobs, McGinn (although he was stinking last night), Lyon & Colville are all good central midfield options. You also had McGuffie's form being the sole positive of McElhone's tenure. With the way we're setting up there's no place for an out and out winger like McGuffie and he can only accommodate two of those four central midfielders.

    When you don't even have 11 players good enough for the division you're in, you simply can't be dropping three who are up to it to accommodate the likes of Kalvin Orsi. I would abandon the back three entirely and launch McGinty into Beaufort's Dyke, then you could get four of them into a midfield five, but knowing that there's little chance of MacPherson deviating from it he needs to at least remove an attacker and get another player in the middle of the park.

    One of Oliver or Nesbitt playing as a second striker off Muirhead rather than having both, then you have McGinn and Jacobs sitting and one of Lyon and Colville ahead of them. If you need to be more attacking you have both Lyon and Colville and drop McGinn. We're going to struggle for goals regardless, we can't surrender the midfield the way we did not just last night but against East Fife in an attempt to resolve that. That doesn't stop us losing bad goals, doesn't stop us being toothless in attack but does mean we end up overrun in the area of the park where we can actually compete.

    The games, or periods in games, under McPherson when we've looked competent Oliver has been on the pitch. I'm not a huge fan and he definitely doesn't give the goal threat that you'd want from a forward but he's absolutely key to letting us get up the pitch as the only forward who can hold onto the ball with any regularity. Otherwise we get absolutely pummeled by any team willing to come out and attack us, and if Mcginty is in there run the serious risk of gifting goals. I can't see him being dropped though unfortunately.

  12. I just finished Last Chance U: Basketball last night. Best series yet in my opinion. There's far fewer egos than the previous seasons. I'm not sure if it's because it's a smaller group than the football seasons but it just seems to get a bit closer to everyone. The last episode hits pretty hard.

  13. 3 hours ago, roman_bairn said:

    IMG_1614519854.433360.jpg

    If she's been getting the abuse online she's claimed then that's not on. The interviews were looking for a rise though. From Farrel and Eddie Jones then fair enough, you want to hear their opinions on what happened for them to lose (both did well not to rise to it).

    I thought the interview with AWJ was awful though, almost straight away into "why did you accept the points if the ref has made a mistake".

  14. Definitely looked like the changes from last week hurt as much as the dreadful refereeing ( Lang was anonymous, Graham was rotten (Thomson wasn't on long enough to comment on). Graham was good enough.) but my god that should have been out of sight before the red card.

  15. 4 minutes ago, Get_The_Subs_On said:

    2 best players on the bench again in Nesbitt and Fjortoff. Feels like there’s more than just footballing reasons for this. 

    Or he's keeping as much consistency with selection as he can? Good result last week so why go changing things about massively?

    Don't get me wrong, I'd start both of them but I can see why consistency is good.

  16. Bills got lucky with that pass interference call but this is a massive win for Josh Allen if they can hold out.

    Don't think I've ever seen a QB facemask someone before!

  17. 15 minutes ago, Comrie said:

    Their whole "we defend and press from the front" gets taken to pieces once teams just bypass the midfield with quicker passing/a slightly more direct approach that means their midfield and wingers running around like idiots means nothing.

    I'm not sure if it's an age thing or what the situation was but they did next to no pressing from the front last night. Defensively they were a minimum of 2 men down from the start with Messi and Suarez just not interested. It only got worse as the game went on. 

    Bayern were very good last night but so much of their success was just through identifying and playing that direct pass you mentioned.

×
×
  • Create New...