Jimmy1876

As I said, other clubs finances are not my concern. Supporting my team absolutely is my concern especially at away matches where getting a win is tougher. Weird old firm mentality and if you haven't learned how dire that situation is having seen what happens when away fans aren't present there is no helping you. Maybe football isn't for you if you're not interested in supporting your team.

Football is more than money. That's become very clear in the last few years where our support has stopped turning on the players. The difference in our support is unreal and the players and manager have consistently spoken about how that's given them that extra 5% to go to the last minute. Cannot believe anyone would remove that for some petty reason. Other teams finances do not concern me whatsoever. There will always be teams with more money and teams with less but I will be at every Falkirk game I can, home or away.

Falkirk Daft have us on the edge of our seats here

Do you know something? I hope you know something

I think most people are saying top 4 would be the marker of a really successful first season back - although some have the expectation I don't think most are taking that for granted. But in general it comes from looking at how league one sides have done the last few years and bar a few, mostly top 4 is where they have finished.

Mine is working really well so might well be what you've said or if you're on a VPN it might have been blocked

Falkirk TV seem to be showing as normal to an "overseas" supporter, I can see it on my account. But definitely no option for PPV as it has shown in the past.

Have thought the same. Genuinely didn't think it would be this big an issue but seems they are organising a full boycott of the stalls. Definitely feel for those who have been priced out of a tradition but with cost of living the fact prices haven't risen previously is surprising.

Fair. Done

Which is why I emphasised how important MacIver is.

Selective comments are presenting one side of things though are they not? I think many people have been talking about the vital role MacIver had yesterday and how excellent he was. Also how important he is to the front 4 with Morrison and Miller relying on MacIvers play.

Absolutely. Just to add I think MacIver will do really well and was my man of the match yesterday.

You've literally two posts ago said that the FD guys were advocating for him being replaced which is not at all the context of that conversation and is a misrepresentation. All they have said is it would be great to have another striker and it would be great if they were an upgrade? And either way, are you really disagreeing that getting an upgrade on any player would be a good thing? I do not understand that at all. I'd be really concerned for the state of football if teams stopped looking for upgrades to be fair to players whether they have performed well or not. If Lawrence Shankland rocked up to TFS I wouldn't be saying no because MacIver did really well in league one.

I think you're the only one that thinks getting in another quality striker that can challenge McIver means anyone wants him replaced. It absolutely means having some positive competition which is firstly good for the team and secondly good for MacIver. In general you have some strange perceptions of other people's discussion. Someone saying we could do with another centre half as back up to Lang and Donaldson does not mean anyone also thinks we are in a terrible situation. It would just mean that we would get to see Keelan Adams in his preferred position.