JamieStevenson Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'm not buying it, but intrigued nonetheless. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave1875 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 HOLLA IF YOU HEAR ME! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieStevenson Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Lovely booking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave1875 Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I predict around 50 seconds before Brock is bleeding in the Street Fight 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieStevenson Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Well this has gone to shit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamieStevenson Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 It's all about the game and how you beat the shit out of Roman Reigns. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booker_d Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 So is Undertaker a heel now? Is Triple H a face? Is Roman Riegns a face? I'm super confused. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booker_d Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Are they even contemplating jobbing the Undertaker to a 46 year old spot monkey? Who hasn't been seen in almost 10 years? Lockbox? What the heck is going on in that place? Honestly? Who thinks this nonsense up (Rhetorical question, we all know the answer). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesc Fabregas Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Just read the results from last night's show and the whole thing sounds brutal. Is this what we want to see in 2016, a recycled Authority storyline from 2000? Why must everything reference the Attitude Era? I didn't really care much for Shane McMahon when I was watching the wrestling as a boy so this means nothing to me, there's nothing to get invested in. What a way for the Undertaker to go out. Let's hope there's a massive swerve somewhere down the line. The road to WrestleMania starts here! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bernardblack Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Shane surely has to get "injured" and have cena fight for him? Otherwise wrestlemania looks seriously grim! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I was a huge Shane fan back in the day. This has got to be a swerve into something else. There are loads of guys who would benefit from a match with Taker. What purpose is this? Nut....this isn't going to happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I think Vince got the idea to bring Shane back from reading Youtube comments by VL neckbeards. Expect him to also end the PG era and put Benoit in the Hall of Fame soon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forameus Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Well Wrestlemania escalated quickly. I had a notification when I woke up of a Youtube channel I subscribe to with a video entitled "Undertaker vs Shane O'Mac for WM?!?!!", and I assumed the dirtsheets were having a field day and just making shit up. But no, went to look at the RAW write-ups, and the crazy b*****ds have actually done it. First thoughts, I actually like it. IF it happens, then we're not going to get a technical masterpiece, but it has that unknown factor. It's hell in a cell, Undertaker isn't going to be stretched to lengths he can't quite reach anymore (Lesnar especially) and it can be a slow-paced bah-gawd slobberknocker of a match. It's one I'd actually like to see right now, although that opinion can change if they ruin the build. Then you think about it a bit more. Shane has come back as the face GM kind of role (or potential at least), the spot I h oped they'd give to Daniel Bryan. I think it's something that they could bring in to breathe some life into a product that badly needs something new for the authority to do, or just to go away for a bit. So in that sense, it's a decent move. BUT, that essentially means that they're trying to paint Undertaker as a heel. I know they teased that with Lesnar and the rampant dick kicking, but is anyone really going to treat Undertaker as a heel at Wrestlemania? Not a chance. What would have made more sense would be for Shane to go after a heel with the same stipulation, then he turns up injured with a few weeks to go. Who replaces him to fight for control of RAW? Undertaker. Which takes me to the last point - the video I watched made a good point that they couldn't really see this match actually happening. Something will happen, Shane will drop out, and then we get a representative against Undertaker instead. Maybe Cena, given he is making vaguer and vaguer comments about working hard to get back. Well they've certainly got people talking, and they needed that post Fastlane. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Shane was gash last time. This can f**k off. Agreed. Shane is dreadful. Just read the results from last night's show and the whole thing sounds brutal. Is this what we want to see in 2016, a recycled Authority storyline from 2000? Why must everything reference the Attitude Era? I didn't really care much for Shane McMahon when I was watching the wrestling as a boy so this means nothing to me, there's nothing to get invested in. What a way for the Undertaker to go out. Let's hope there's a massive swerve somewhere down the line. The road to WrestleMania starts here! This is exactly what I was thinking, specifically Mania 2000 with a McMahon in every corner. What must the wrestlers be thinking when the grand plan to turn things around seems to be Shane McMahon?! Truly utter nonsense. They could actually get behind some guys for once, promote some folk from NXT, fire shite like Show, Kane, Henry, The Ascension and generally freshen things up. Instead we get Shane McMahon. Whilst he had a couple of mental matches in 2000/01, he surely won't be able to do that shit again. This is tragic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francesc Fabregas Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Can't help but thinking it's all a great big work. It has to be! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DigOutYourSoul Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 I'm really confused. Why is Shane back!? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quentin Taranbino Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 A 3hr Raw A grand total of 6 matches 4 of those were tag matches 3 of those featured ascension, social outcasts and lucha dragons. The other featured a rematch from Fastlane No wonder raw is going to shit 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Can't help but thinking it's all a great big work. It has to be! It won't be. It's got overbooking fest written all over it though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 As long as he doesn't do those god awful punches it could be alright. It just doesn't make any sense from a booking standpoint though, I cant figure out any logical reason why Shane would fight Undertaker. None whatsoever, did they explain anything on Raw? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tamdunk Posted February 23, 2016 Share Posted February 23, 2016 Could we see a return of the greatest faction in Pro Wrestling history? From the mean streets of Greenwich - Gas, Abs, Rodney 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.