Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Apparently it's meant to be ironic. It isn't of course, it's just someone having a fuckton too many spoons. And not one mention of a spork. A real missed opportunity I think. Is every finitely presented periodic group finite? Ah, now we are getting somewhere. Bertrand Russell spend years developing mathematical logic and analytic philosophy just so he could discuss whether the number 1 exists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 It's not a lack of understanding it's laziness. So you come in demanding implicitness yet you can't even achieve it on a simple webapge. One might suggest a touch hypocritical. That's a silly thing for them to be worrying about. Are you sure something wasn't lost in translation? It's the natural extension of your argument. Get rid of nukes, we are at risk, Denmark has no nukes, they are at risk. Do you even abstract, bro? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 So you come in demanding implicitness yet you can't even achieve it on a simple webapge. One might suggest a touch hypocritical. It's the natural extension of your argument. Get rid of nukes, we are at risk, Denmark has no nukes, they are at risk. Do you even abstract, bro? Well then yes, they are. But because they are does it mean we need to be? Especially since the cost of dismantling the current setup and building a new one somewhere down South will probably cost more than maintaining what we have.... It seems like a futile effort on salmond's part. To me it seems like salmond has had these ideals for his entire career and he would lose face by changing his stance on trident, but in going ahead with the decommissioning of Faslane he's just causing a massive financial and employment problem for Scotland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperTon Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 ^^^ Idiot found. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Well then yes, they are. So you are saying Denmark are at risk of attack. Would you care to expand as to from whom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperCaleyGoBallistic Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Great website. Would read again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 Sorry I didn't see the first part of your post about the code. I did that in an hour laying in bed one Sunday a few weeks ago... I don't think the integrity of the code on a thrown together site is relevant. I also have found that people who go to great lengths to overstate how intelligent they are on forums are generally 14 years old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 So you are saying Denmark are at risk of attack. Would you care to expand as to from whom? I didn't say they were at risk of attack. You did. I agreed for the sake of following through on your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperTon Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I also have found that people who go to great lengths to overstate how intelligent they are on forums are generally 14 years old. Well you go to great lengths to show how intelligent you aren't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 It's the natural extension of your argument. Get rid of nukes, we are at risk, Denmark has no nukes, they are at risk. Well then yes, they are. But because they are does it mean we need to be? So you are saying Denmark are at risk of attack. Would you care to expand as to from whom? I didn't say they were at risk of attack. You did. I agreed for the sake of following through on your point. You just agreed, just for the sake of it? Well there is a fact you can sit on your badly written webpage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cracowjambo Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I didn't say they were at risk of attack. You did. I agreed for the sake of following through on your point. Backtracking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Backtracking Is that a fact? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 Well you go to great lengths to show how intelligent you aren't. I'm just here to debate. I'll be more intelligent than some and less so than others, like us all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cracowjambo Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Is that a fact? There are no facts. Hence the thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I'll be more intelligent than some and less so than others, like us all. I also have found that people who go to great lengths to overstate how intelligent they are on forums are generally 14 years old. So... you're 14 then? You are great, I like you, it's like you don't even realise there is a rake on the ground but still stand on it for comic effect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 :lol:You just agreed, just for the sake of it? Well there is a fact you can sit on your badly written webpage. Not for the sake of it. To follow through on the point you made. Your continual reference to my badly written web page puzzles me. The web page is written just fine, otherwise it wouldn't work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 There are no facts. Hence the thread Wait, now hold on. There is a lot of spoons somewhere. That is a fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Casual Bystander Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 The web page is written just fine, otherwise it wouldn't work. Those two comments are not mutually inclusive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thatguyspage Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 So... you're 14 then?You are great, I like you, it's like you don't even realise there is a rake on the ground but still stand on it for comic effect. I like a bit of banter. Not been on a forum in.... Many years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperTon Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I'm just here to debate. I'll be more intelligent than some and less so than others, like us all. Well given you've already contradicted yourself a few times and not even realised it I'd put you in the category of "pretty thick" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.