Mr Bairn Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Unbelievable Seems like EVEL only excludes the SNP MPs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 This didn't happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted January 15, 2016 Author Share Posted January 15, 2016 This didn't happen Saw it on the Yes Lockerbie facebook page May just be propaganda though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted January 15, 2016 Share Posted January 15, 2016 Saw it on the Yes Lockerbie facebook page May just be propaganda though Has to be.... some of these yes FB sites are a tad creative sometimes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 No, he didn't this is nonsense. As part of the new regime, the Speaker designated certain parts of the bill as English-only matters. The Commons then resolved to bring the English Grand Committee into session for the discussion of those parts of the bill, a consent motion was put and agreed to by English MPs. The Bill then proceeded to its third reading, which deals with the bill as a whole and which involves the whole Commons. David Mundell was one of those who voted in favour of the bill as a whole at Third Reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 No, he didn't this is nonsense. Strictly speaking, the thread title is accurate. He did vote on it - at the conventional stages. He didn't, however, vote during the English (and Welsh) grand committees. Not least because these consent motions both passed without a Division, so there's no record of who actually vote "Aye". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 Strictly speaking, the thread title is accurate. He did vote on it - at the conventional stages. The bill as a whole isn't an "English law". It's a UK one. Debated by the UK Parliament. So the thread title is inaccurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted January 16, 2016 Share Posted January 16, 2016 It's a Mr Bairn thread it's not supposed to be correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.