bennett Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Just now, Rugster said: I don't really care if you're buying it, I'm not selling anything. Can you answer the question about the "responsibility to cover matches" now please? We're still discussing your claim that I lied about Christopher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 2 minutes ago, Romeo said: S'not going to happen. 2 minutes ago, bennett said: We're still discussing your claim that I lied about Christopher. Called it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 6 minutes ago, bennett said: Not buying that, the spfl statement was pretty clear that it's not common practice for delegates to brief journalists. No, its says delegates are requested not to and unequivocally stated that there is no formal rule to this effect. Also this is the first reference I have seen to this request, maybe it was common practice right up until sevco thew a wobbly because they don't like the truth? Are you really saying you've never heard the phrase "will be included in the match delegates report" used by a reporter? I'm sure I've heard that countless times, usually in reference to your scumbag fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JakeSAFC Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 The bbc have a history of digs at Rangers (mccoist edit) thst they wouldn't try with any other club. Aw poor Rangers aways the victims You're starting to sound like the other arse cheek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 5 minutes ago, bennett said: We're still discussing your claim that I lied about Christopher. You're capable of talking about more than one thing at a time, surely? In any case, we've moved on from that, as it's clear he didn't lie. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Saintee Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 44 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: What this latest ban has shown is that the BBC is a near-irrelevance as far as Rangers are concerned and if they never reported another thing about us it'd make no practical difference. I'm pretty sure other clubs with decent club TV; Youtube channels; well-developed social media etc would say much the same. So maybe our far-sighted and thoughtful sport administrators could challenge the BBC to change focus somewhat and put more emphasis on the clubs with lower media resources. That would surely be something worthwhile from our national broadcasters rather than indulging in hand-wringing about their spurious 'Ibrox ban' as reported by the OP. Perhaps P&B could accept a similar challenge and reduce the hand-wringing and shite threads about 'a new club'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Saintee Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 11 minutes ago, bennett said: We're still discussing your claim that I lied about Christopher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 30 minutes ago, Rugster said: You're capable of talking about more than one thing at a time, surely? In any case, we've moved on from that, as it's clear he didn't lie. Thanks. We haven't moved on from that at all, it's clear that it wasn't common practice for him to get delegates reports leaked to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cas79 Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 It's just Rangers don't like news that make them look bad simple as, and if a factual report or story is published that trainer doesn't like it's poor us, we don't like the truth, your bias, it's the same old chestnut thats been employed since early press releases whether it's company's, governments, or individuals that's why they hire aggressive PR firms to distort the facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 5 minutes ago, bennett said: We haven't moved on from that at all, it's clear that it wasn't common practice for him to get delegates reports leaked to him. He didn't say it was. The reason you won't answer the question is obviously because you can't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 6 minutes ago, bennett said: We haven't moved on from that at all, it's clear that it wasn't common practice for him to get delegates reports leaked to him. Was the report leaked (a lie) or did the observer tell him what he was going to include in it (the truth). I've left hints in there for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 9 minutes ago, Rugster said: He didn't say it was. The reason you won't answer the question is obviously because you can't. Twitter screen grabs from a few pages back state otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 1 minute ago, bennett said: Twitter screen grabs from a few pages back state otherwise. No they don't. You're really being obtuse here in an attempt to avoid answering the question about the responsibility of the BBC to cover matches. What he said was he always asked the match delegate if there are any problems. He does not say if he's told, and he certainly mentions nothing about "leaks". So, he did not say it was "common practice for him to get delegates reports leaked to him". It can't be made any clearer. Now I know you're not as stupid as you are making out here, we all make mistakes, move on from it and address your second failure in as many pages and demonstrate where it is stated that the BBC have a responsibility to cover matches please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 I see the sleekit wee grassing creep is skulking about the thread dishing out greens to Bennet and reds to all who disagree with him again, as usual. What a cowardly little shitebag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 He didn't say it was. The reason you won't answer the question is obviously because you can't. Getting bennett to answer a straight question is always fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 11 minutes ago, Rugster said: I see the sleekit wee grassing creep is skulking about the thread dishing out greens to Bennet and reds to all who disagree with him again, as usual. What a cowardly little shitebag. You're checking who gives out dots now, you've lost the plot.... No point in continuing this nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deej Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Just now, bennett said: You're checking who gives out dots now, you've lost the plot.... No point in continuing this nonsense. Excellent deflection, 10/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Just now, bennett said: You're checking who gives out dots now, you've lost the plot.... No point in continuing this now I've been comprehensively shown up and I've been handed some greenies by the lurker, too ashamed to show his face. FTFY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 Bennett has shat it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted December 13, 2016 Share Posted December 13, 2016 40 minutes ago, bennett said: You're checking who gives out dots now, you've lost the plot.... No point in continuing this nonsense. You get a notification when someone dots you. Clearly you cannot answer the question so we will just all accept you made a monumental cock of yourself, again, as usual, and move on as you wish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.