sophia

I'm pretty sure I could track down any significant business event that I was involved with via over the last twenty years. Once things make it into that environment, unless you make a determined effort to remove and delete, they tend to stay put. Anyone who is any way busy will have an equivalent time management facility and even if you don't, for a professional person to go to court so spectacularly ill prepared is, at the least, surprising.

I'm not entirely sure why the witness wouldn't have prepared adequately and referred to diaries or other contemporaneous documents that would render their evidence as unequivocal.

When I think of Cantona I think of his sublime talent, his chest puffed out and his1996 cup final goal. I would contend that only those with but a passing acquaintance of the game would firstly recall a single disjoint. See Jimmy Johnstone. Most people where exactly? The assertion wasn't about an item on a recall list, it was about single No1 hit parade event. The BBC output from Glasgow didn't claim the "game", they specifically referenced the first goal and I'm not really sure* what mindset allowed them to think that was reasonable. *I can have a good guess

What drives you to be so rude?

You would expect it from BBC Anglia and the thickest there might have their historical disappointment somehow assuaged but there is no excuse for a similar editorial line from Glasgow. I fear that, heaped upon a previous partisan outlook, we now have an editorial and intellectual deficit that will continue to disappoint those who would wish for better.

I feel so relieved that the snp will be unique in feeling any covid induced economic chill. I actually think that starting from what might be perceived to be a common reset would be a great advantage.

BBC radio Scotland have claimed that Diego Maradona was most famous for a goal against England. I'm not at all sure that everyone in Napoli or Buenos Aires would necessarily agree with this quite curious take.

Indeed a quick search reminds me... why would you choose to appear so charmless

I'd have thought that common or garden covid related risk assessments should prevail when judging the necessity or even efficacy of each task that requires transport. Eliminating the risk is always the best option. That you seem to have completely overlooked this aspect is enough for me to invite you to reconsider your very harsh summing up of ICT's role in this matter.

The exposing of epidermis is raw but despite the fun I've had with the choices hirsute, I feel for the individual and his wellbeing

That is disgusting but I'm happy to report that only an approximate 19.7% of our fellow denizens will be taken with this base bigotry and that won't be enough for DRoss to maintain his veneer with even a shred of credibility

As an opportunistic visitor I recall being at Old Trafford and being surprised by a groundswell of common opinion and it seemed to me that the beseeching throng would get their wish and Alex Ferguson would be gone. History records that he salvaged something from the game and time gave him a connection with greatness. It cannot be denied that the whole of the highlands would wish for better fortune and I wonder if we are being too harsh on a young and enthusiastic artisan.

I see the home secretary has given a full apology and it comes concurrent with her body language (mostly her dead eyes) saying I'm untouchable. She may well be as Johnson has been paternal in his decree that the matter is closed.

This kind of flippancy when dealing with such things brings to me great sadness and we should all be aware of our acts and how they may be read by others. It's fewer, fewer dead farmers.

Hiya Kirstene Hair and how are your berries?

I'm tempted to invite you to take this promulgation to the covid thread but instead I'll ask you to expand upon your use of "in all probability"....

Grrr <<<< not going but not jealous, nope, not jealous at all, no siree, not jealous

Ordinarily I'd agree but I have to admit that the policy of when they go low, you go high might be one that is out of time and if we go too polite, we may well be trumped by roguery.

Would you say you were disingenuous or perhaps you simply overlooked what is common knowledge?

Why would you want that? Surely him being amongst the best that they have shows them in the light that they deserve?

Yes indeed. Couldn't score against Bad McKay a few months ago, fast forward through spring and summer and here's another for a slice of the pie that is humble

^^^^ Five words

Given that I found myself to be diverted earlier, I rather think I've done ever so well in catching up with this most positively momentous global day via the prism of this thread. Unfortunately the above from page 162 spectacularly fails to read the room in a way that is culturally maladroit on the Trump scale. Never in the history of P&B have I seen so many prejudices packed into so few words and the subsequent justifications made me think that they made lots of sense, a lot of sense. I'm told the most amount of sense ever. Apologies for the digression and it's remiss of me to be diverted by such frippery. I raise a glass to the denouement of the peacock and for those that bought into it, I wish them well whilst introspection leads them to the light.

I was winning by a lot A lot Not now big boy That was indeed a concession speech and I and a many like me can sleep easy.

Michael Palin's pacific rim