Raith_Raver

Really? Did you watch the game? Despite Dunfermline having more chances we actually had more possession.

Ask Levein

So simple

I'm not trying to criticise the pitch as such, just agreeing with Levein's point that Raith are likely to play much better on their own surface

An honest poster

Aye, there's always next season... and the one after that...

Just watched McGlynn's interview on Raith TV from EEP and the pitch looks shite.

According to Sportsound the pitch was bumpy which didnt suit Rovers' passing game - much as McGlynn said about Dens - and the Stark's pitch will give Rovers a big advantage on Saturday. Levein makes Rovers strong favourites now because of that.

I highly recommend Gary Locke, he suits your style

Great you've consigned Falkirk to fifth after they way you've been mugged by them this last couple of seasons

Poetic that Montrose overtook you after the times you've mugged them

King for Matthews - dross for gold

The Mo take the lead agaisnt Thistell

'Mon the Monklands Marvels

Watson didn't play at Starks last time

I think we'll ease past the "massive" club with at least a couple of goals over the two legs

Lets see where the lack of intelligence lies... The title is not "last time at East End Park" but "Raith Preview" and then gives the terms of reverence as "MATCHES AGAINST RAITH THIS SEASON". As I said Tte only match it's interested in is the 4-1 - yea last time at East End Park. You really are thick.

The news about Matthews is great, he's been missed, but having been out for so long his match fitness will be a concern.

We outplayed Livingston for an hour in the Cup. The 2-1 defeat at Dens was the tale of two "penalties"

You should have read the article, the context was the history of games between the clubs.

No fans so doesn't count. How many times? "No fans" didnt stop the so called preview spending most of the time on you 4-1 win tho...

I see on Dunfermline's website their preview of the game utterly ignores the 5-1 defeat. They're obviously in denial.

They play completely different roles. Bizzare to compare the two. I'm aware of that. It depends on what formation he picks. He substituted Mendy and brought on Armstrong on Friday - is Armstrong a central defender - was that "bizarre"?

For some bizarre reason McGlynn prefers the inept King