printer

What's the deal for non-season ticket holders and away fans? Obviously getting as many people paying is financially beneficial to the club.

Ouch! Very unlucky for G. With Yates losing time the race has been blown completely open.

And yet you have Murray and Evans in your side.

What nonsense.

Very much this. We've done well the last few years with signing hungry young strikers with pace and a bit of quality, but we certainly need at least one and preferably more this year. I like that we have added Jamieson, Grant and Lynch to the squad. The overall age of our signed/established players, wonderful though they are, is high and adding a few promising younger players is sensible.

I don't think she looks much different.

Indeed, feel sorry for him, but that's sport at the top level and part of what can make it so enthralling.

Astonishing stuff!

A huge talent. RIP Toots.

I wonder if that will catch on?

Yeah, there's definitely something in that. We've got a tried and tested team unit with a lot of good, experienced footballers. The dressing room is, by all accounts, a very good one. Loanees seem to thrive at Alloa with a lot of them getting good full-time moves out if it (O'Hara, Zanatta etc). For a young defender in particular it's a great place to get good level competitive experience playing alongside the likes of Andy Graham and Taggs.

He isn't. Like I said it's just a function of a sheep mentality. Most people don't have the intelligence, critical thinking or courage to form their own opinions and so jump on the perceived truths of the masses.

Agreed. If Grant and Jamieson do well then we are OK in defence and midfield, but we will need a couple of Zanatta/O'Hara types to complement Buchs and Thomson in attack. Peter Grant pulled a rabbit out of the hat with Kevin O'Hara last year, but that will be difficult to do again, so I expect we are talking loans.

It's a sheep mentality.

Is there any other sport where the commentators are so clueless about the rules? You are (well) paid to inform the viewer - go and f***ing learn the laws!

That's a red 100%.

Rastafari!

This didn't happen.

Is this a whoosh? [emoji53]

Crack on m8.

There's an element of ignorance in there to. tbf. [emoji5]

The old dear driving the car at least looked apologetic. [emoji23]

[emoji1787]

That's a factor, but they are leaving it very late and the likes of Froome and G are a long way off Grand Tour form at the moment. Again, maybe Roglic is peaking too early, but he hasn't done a lot of racing (no one has); before last year's Giro he had possibly over-raced. One thing's for sure, Jumbo Visma's challenge to Ineos (and there's Pinot too) is looking like the Tour could be truly fascinating.

Ineos certainly have a problem for the Tour now. Roglic is looking stronger than Bernal and man for man they look in better form. Froome was saying in his post race interview that he is happy with his form given that he has missed over a year's racing, but that's the problem, he's got no proven form at all. I wouldn't write him or Ineos off - that would be foolish, but they have some difficult decisions to make. Maybe you are right, Kiddy, and Carapac comes in.