Jump to content

Judy Murray

Gold Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    672

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Judy Murray

    Edinburgh Derby Thread - The Ghost of David Brent Past

    in Scottish Premiership General Chatter

    Posted

    1 hour ago, Kyle Reese said:


    Hiya Judy… what a revolting thing to say about a stranger on the internet.

    I looked up what an “incel” is… is that not a really weird thing to say about a stranger, based only on the football team they support humiliating yours?

    Hope you have a bearable evening tonight… you ‘statutory rapist’ (see what I did there?)…

    0-1 you vermin shite-hawk scum.

    HHGH

    Imagine taking a victory this badly

    1

    The Hibernian Thread

    in Scottish Premiership General Chatter

    Posted

    2 hours ago, VincentGuerin said:

    Mate, honestly, I hate seeing people make this point. The difference is clear. As it stands we are all way down the pecking order, but we have an element of control. Hibs didn't sell to Celtic with McGinn because they never stumped up the cash. You control when you sell, to as much extent as anyone else, and you control who you sell to, and when you don't sell because it's not worth it. This will not be the case in your relationship with Bournemouth.

    The investment will be a bad thing if Hibs end up continually getting the shitty end of the stick and find they can't get out of it. I haven't seen any Hibs fans asking serious questions about that. After our Vlad experience, that's a worry.

    LAst time with the FFP, mate. Bournemouth and Lorient need to stay within it to avoid domestic sanctions. You're going to see money move between them as is required as accounting periods shift. Hibs don't have the same requirement. Don't drop your popcorn in shock if you find Hibs get the bad end of that deal. Again, this is quite an obvious point, but no Hibbies seem to be asking about it.

    The identity is a personal thing. I've explained what I think. I think it's beneath Hibs to be subservient to another club. If it was my cub, I'd have no part of it.

    I think we've interacted on here enough for you to have a general idea of what my genuine views on fitba are. I can honestly say I'd be binning Hearts if this was us. And it may be us in a few years, McKinlay mentioned it at the AGM today. I'd be finished with it, and I think those I interact with on here know that's not a partisan point, it's entirely consistent with the views I have on fitba that I bore you all with. I don't think you'll ever find a post of mine that would suggest I'd be for this in any way.

    Anyway, have fun lads. I've made my points and we're going in circles now. I honestly, and with grudging respect for Hibernian as our rivals and part of our biggest game of the season, hope this doesn't end up an absolute nightmare for you. But I think that as a support you're all in danger of avoiding the big obvious questions, and given that your main owners just now are the foreign family of your previous buyer who has passed away (and they may not be as committed as he), I'd be genuinely concerned that a deal that suits them may not necessarily suit hibs long-term.

    I hope Hearts pump you all the time, but I don't want to see you Rangersed.

    Hugs and kisses, lads.

    I didn’t read this post but it’s an absolute minter nonetheless

    9

    The Hibernian Thread

    in Scottish Premiership General Chatter

    Posted

    1 minute ago, VincentGuerin said:

    It certainly damaged the club's reputation.

    This is different, however. This is an undeniable change in Hibernian's role as a club. You now exist for the benefit of another club.

    That's simply undeniable. You're third choice in a chain.

    I'd imagine away from the bravado of the online world there will be Hibs fans horrified when the reality sets in.

    Money laundering ok. Investment bad. Thanks for clearing this up 

    0

    The Hibernian Thread

    in Scottish Premiership General Chatter

    Posted

    20 minutes ago, VincentGuerin said:

    There are plenty of examples of how these things work. You'd need to be full Head in the Sand to not see that.

    As I mentioned earlier, my main objection would be the fundamental erosion of identity. You're not Hibs for the sake of Hibs anymore. You're Hibs for the betterment of Bournemouth. There's no other reason for this deal to exist.

    That doesn't take intimate knowledge of the deal to grasp. And were it Hearts involved, it's the point you'd all be arguing.

    Was hearts identity eroded by being a money laundering scheme?

    1
×
×
  • Create New...