-
Posts
9,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by No_Problemo
-
-
Just now, BukyOHare said:
I'm failing to see what our game plan and tactic in the final third actually is.
I don’t think we have one. Walsh might help.
1 -
58 minutes ago, Insaintee said:
Sorry yes it is. Two wrongs don't make a right. Goldson's comments smacked of Roy Keane. Also Goldson was not racially abused nor was Roofe. Their actions and comments are not helpful.
For example, if Kamara had lamped the boy (doubtful I admit, but possible). Does that mean that it all done and dusted and evened out. No absolutely not.
On the other hand if Kamara has lamped the boy and there's no evidence of racism (which other than Kamara's word there isn't) is sounds like an excuse.
Are you saying that the racist abuse was allowable due to the boy having seen his goal keeper kicked in the face and stretchered off.
See, there is no justification
No hard to understand, you don't get to take the law into your own hands,
This is a such a pile of utter shite, I don’t even know where to start with it. The comparisons are wild.
0 -
58 minutes ago, Insaintee said:
Racism should definately be punished. However, apparently only Kamara heard the remark, which means it's unfortunately a he said she said situation.
I recommend watching Anton Ferdinand's documentary about his experience with John Terry and the FA. There is unlikely to be a happy conclusion to this for anyone.
It's also unfortunate that this incident happened in 87th minute of a game where the **** were loosing 2-0 at home and going out of a European tie and had two men sent off. Accusations of poor looser, heads gone, sour grapes etc are a convenient deflection for Sparta Prague, and frankly Goldson's comments about going out to hurt someone in the final minutes play into that narrative.
Equally Roofe might have done better to spend his time on social media explaining why he kicked the Prague goal keeper in the face rather than talking about Racist comments, I don't think he was on the pitch long enough to be racial abused by Sparta players and definately was not on the pitch when the alleged comments were made. I don't think his comments on the matter are helpful or relevant
Racism is absolutely wrong, but it is also not an excuse for violence. Rangers have lost much of the moral high ground by their behavior and comments. I don't want to get dragged into all that Slippy G has no class thing. But there are ways to support your player that don't involve all this drama and outrage
Hopefully Eufa will get to the bottom of things, and all the wrong doings of that evening will be punished, the match declared void and goes to either a replay or Rangers awarded a walk over 3-0 and go through to the next round
I really don’t think it’s appropriate to condemn the behaviour of players clearly hurt and emotional after a horrific incident such as that. It is a completely normal reaction, and doesn’t even register as an issue here.
1 -
19 minutes ago, Baptiste Bourgeois said:
If there's any moron here, its the fella stating he he can conclusively analyse the "muscular body compositions" of two scrawny footballers based on picture evidence.
As opposed to the moron, who can’t look at two people and objectively tell differences in their physiques.
0 -
I have no idea how we can go from having a massive uptick in vaccines to a shortage, in the space of a few days.
0 -
9 minutes ago, Baptiste Bourgeois said:
You're the one that started arguing against my point (terribly, I might add) Absolute moron man.I've made what I believe is a pretty convincing argument as to why I believe it would work, and why Tierney would be better utilized at LWB. It's you fucking brainlets that haven't provided a single coherent argument as to why I'm wrong - other than "are lad tierney huz goat a Bigger quad!!!" - and yet still want to keep coming back at me repeating the same nonsense.
You really are a genuine moron aren’t you.
1 -
To add to the posts above, people do remember that the victory over Dundee at home involved Sinisalo pulling off several incredible saves...
1 -
27 minutes ago, Baptiste Bourgeois said:
You're the one that brought it up m8. And I agree, it really is a fucking weird thing to try and debate something that you're unable to factually quantify.
Any hypothesis as to why the scrawny manlet Robertson has 56% a success rate in aerial duels per 90 mins compared to the 26% success rate of the man he is suposedly miles behind in muscular body composition?
I’m aware I did - was simply making light of the situation.
I never met mentioned anything about aerial ability but there are sever factors involved in that. I was only talking about objectively one clearly being more muscular. Tbh, if you can look at both of them and not see that one is clearly more muscular then there isn’t much point debating it.
0 -
-
5 minutes ago, Baptiste Bourgeois said:
The frame pish is just nonsense. See below.
Its not bonkers at all. Robertson needs players in and around him to be successful. Leaving him isolated to to plough a lonely furrow up the wing doesn't work, because his game isnt about taking players on directly like Tierney. And anyway Robertson is a better passer, uses his weak foot more frequently and is more comfortable coming inside, and slightly better from a technical ball control perspective, i.e manouvering the ball in tight spaces. I think it would actually be a benefit to have him bringing the ball out from the back instead of Tierney
Neither has anyone until they first play there. As I alluded to previously, Tierney was thrown in there at home to England having never played there before. He done fine.
The physicality point is nonsense. Tierney and Robertson are the same height, and KT is certainly not stronger. He's built like a rake. You seriously trying to tell me there's any significant physical strength divide between these two people? Come off it
The stats show Robertson wins a SIGNIFICANTLY higher percentage of aerial duals per 90 than Tierney. Before any of you claim that thats because Tierney has been targeted with long balls when he played at CB, this is only counting games played at LB
If we’re purely talking physicality - Tierney is absolutely miles in front of Robertson in terms of muscular composition.
0 -
1 hour ago, wuffster said:
There’s some nonsense being written on this thread. Calm down with the Kerr bashing, at best it is unedifying at worst you come across as desperate for a new daddy who will ultimately disappoint you.
The irony of this, after your comments about Hopkin the other day, is absolutely wild.
2 -
I genuinely don’t know what our best team is now, which can only be a good thing.
Dykes up front with Adams, or Adams with two of Fraser, Armstrong, McGinn, Christie in behind.
If McTominay pushes into midfield, who plays alongside him, Jack or McGregor.
0 -
2 minutes ago, callum-ayr said:
Are top flight clubs able to still do loans at the moment? I don’t think he would be a possible summer signing, but potential loan for the rest of the season surely wouldn’t be a massive shout.
I did think that too, but no idea tbh!
Completely agree...
Had a look there, it was Hopkin who signed him previously.
0 -
16 minutes ago, callum-ayr said:
Listening to the terrace podcast, Scott Robinson fell out with martindale and going to leave at the end of the season and might leave on loan before that, wonder if hopkin had him?
You would think he would get a bottom six side.... although worth a try!
0 -
Just as an aside, Chalmers was one of the reasons McMullen was so quiet. As Hopkin said in pre match, his job was to support Reading with that.
1 -
I can see why Dundee fans are so frustrated. The amount the must be paying Adam and Cummings.
Adam strolls around like he’s too good for it playing Hollywood passes, which generally go to no one. Cummings did nothing but fall over.
1 -
1 minute ago, pandarilla said:
Eh?
He set up the first 2 goals?
(his break played in Reading)Yes, I thought McCowan was outstanding tonight.
1 -
Well played McKenzie. This is exactly what stepping up and taking your chance looks like.
5 -
The tears of these commentators
2 -
16 minutes ago, rb123! said:
Hopkin swinging the changes which is pretty radical, not often you see an Ayr team over the last few seasons making 3 tactical changes to a squad with none enforced through injuries.
Not going to say we're setting up to defend however that looks quite a "stifled" "compact" midfield, or either a 4/3/3 which means i'm talking nonsense, however if it's the former that's a bit disappointing considering Dundee seem to be playing with quite a weakened defence.
Still i'm a bit more confident seeing McKenzie starting, give us a focal point, best we've got just now so we just have to get on with it.
2-1 Ayr
C'MON UNITED
All depends really - hopefully having two more defensive players will allow Chalmers to dictate more and Smith and McCowan to get closer to McKenzie.
1 -
4 minutes ago, da_no_1 said:
Bollocks. It's not even close to being anything like that utter madness.
Did I say it was?
I said it was behind that...
0 -
Che Adams and a relatively positive roadmap, what a glorious day.
5 -
No heads gone from me either...
Seems not too bad!
1 -
Turner on loan to league one is only behind the Vaughan transfer as the weirdest I’ve ever seen in this division.
0
The Ultimate Super Ayr Thread
in Scottish Championship General Chatter
Posted
Don’t care about the Elgin game whatsoever. No crowds confirm that.