Jump to content

Jinky67

Gold Members
  • Posts

    6,480
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jinky67

  1. Ffs mate, if you have one of those you should have gotten it out weeks ago and saved you getting your hopes up.
  2. What exactly stops your friend naming his abuser and taking the steps to have that person or persons held to account? Surely a route exists for him to do that with his friends supporting him?
  3. A massive well done to county for doing what we couldn’t last week and seeing that result out. Brilliant performance from them. Hopefully Clement and all the Rangers fans who travelled up to Dingwall had an absolutely shite and long journey home. No less than you deserve.
  4. Nice rendition of No Pope of Rome to welcome him onto the park by the away fans, so nice of them
  5. Then victims can do that themselves, I’d imagine most of those responsible are now dead so can’t really sue for slander nor can surviving relatives. Celtic could I suppose insert some clause in the settlement that victims don’t do that but I’d like to think they wouldn’t as it wouldn’t be a great look. Offering settlement is absolutely the right thing to do however, these people and their families have suffered enough and for too long. You can’t put a price on integrity and doing the right thing, it just has to be done.
  6. All of the above contradicts your logic that it was a penalty as none of this applies to AJ
  7. It’s not subjective at all, AJgot the ball and Lawrence didn’t which makes them different. You cannot view them in the same way. You can argue Silva might have gotten the ball first which is debatable as CCV looked like he may intercept however Silva made his decision to not try get the ball and to dive.
  8. how can it be similar if one player got the ball and the other didn’t?
  9. Contact doesn’t mean foul though. The question is did the contact impede him and well….you know my thought on that
  10. You’re clearly trying way too hard to get a nibble bud. I appreciate the effort though
  11. Why would I be hurt by your lack of integrity and narrow mindedness? It’s pity I feel for you that you need to go the level of actually making something up
  12. Ok so it’s possible in your opinion for VAR to be used multiple times in the same match and the referee still come to the wrong decision in some instances and not in others?
  13. This was a very simple task to quote the post where I suggested some underlying conspiracy. You haven’t done that because I haven’t implied any such thing so to suggest I have is the only thing underhand and sly here and that’s really disappointing from someone like you. You don’t need to make things up, it just isn’t necessary
  14. I can only assume that you believe all of those decisions were clear and obvious errors?
  15. Can you highlight the post where I suggested that? I said it was a poor decision so I really don’t get how you get from there to me suggesting conspiracy theories.
  16. Not like me to defend him but I think it’s harsh, went through the defenders legs at pace. I’d say the defender has to do better but need to credit Idah also
  17. Can’t I offer an opinion on incidents during a match involving my own team? Is this some sort of new forum gestapo role you have taken up?
  18. Ye whit? As for hurting maybe a little, I never expected Man U to take points off Liverpool, fuckers. A decent coupon properly burst
  19. Again it was in reply. You don’t agree and that’s fine but I did give you my opinion on it
×
×
  • Create New...