Jump to content

AJF

Gold Members
  • Posts

    8,022
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

4,513 Excellent

Profile Information

  • My Team
    Rangers

Recent Profile Visitors

9,167 profile views
  1. No Sima, Matondo or Ridvan for Sunday. Jack also remains out but what else is new.
  2. Can’t recall if it was the same incident, but yeah, I think I remember it being explaining that due to issues with accurately measuring offside due to limited frames per second, they make the lines thicker and if the attackers line and the defenders line overlap, then it is deemed onside.
  3. “Oh wouldn’t it just be hilarious if we absolutely gubbed you, Dundee. But no, seriously, great season you’re having, lads”
  4. Like I said, from seeing it in real time perhaps as he never claimed for a foul is what led me to think it wasn’t an attempt to con the referee. If it genuinely was, it would be ridiculous in the extreme considering nobody was near him.
  5. Fair enough. If so, it’s a ridiculous decision considering there didn’t appear to be anyone near him to anticipate a touch from.
  6. I’ve not watched it back though. I was basing it on seeing it at the game. It looked as though the ball was played at him rather than in front for him to take it in his stride and It didn’t seem like Silva was claiming for anything. He just seemed to lie on the deck after it with his hands on his head as if he’d fucked up a sitter.
  7. This will either provide us the opportunity to seal a cup double and put a little bit of shine on what may ultimately be a disappointing season should we lose out on the league title, or it will give us the opportunity to complete a domestic treble. Fine margins on how a win here will be viewed.
  8. Was it not just a case of him failing to sort his feet out as the pass from Dessers was kind of straight at him instead of in front of him to take in his stride rather than a dive looking for a penalty? At the match he didn’t seem to be appealing for anything, he just had his head in his hands for presumably spurning a great opportunity to score.
  9. Aye that was Diomande. He played well, just felt he faded a little in the second half and was blowing a bit before he was subbed.
  10. Eh, I think Bennett covered it well earlier in the thread. Nothing more I can say really or that is worth repeating other than condemning it.
  11. Thought Balogun was excellent today. Best player on the park after a big call from Clement to drop Goldson. Cantwell, Diomande and Sterling also pretty decent and Butland makes two great saves when called upon. Really need to be more clinical though, particularly late on where we created a good two or three opportunities to get a third but we lack a real killer instinct. Relatively even game, I just felt we turned the screw a bit more in the periods we were on top than Hearts could manage in the periods they were. Sima going off so early is a concern and I hope it’s not a recurrence of his previous thigh injury.
  12. If he believes it was a foul on Johnston he was 100% correct to award that foul rather than award the penalty.
  13. The ref has done the correct thing here. I remember a cup tie earlier in the season we had against Morton. I think Dessers tackled a defender to win the ball then proceeded to round the keeper and score, however the ref had already blown his whistle before he put it in. Given that the foul seemed soft I was pretty annoyed he never let it run for a few seconds, as he should have, to at least allow the option of the foul to be reviewed. In this instance, the ref has done just that. The debate as to whether it was a foul on Johnston can be had, but it was simply good refereeing in my opinion.
  14. In fairness, just because it hasn’t been mentioned on TV or replays of it shown, doesn’t mean it hasn’t been reviewed. In all likelihood it would’ve been reviewed while play was ongoing and deemed not a clear and obvious error.
×
×
  • Create New...