Chewing Taffies
-
Posts
1,618 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Chewing Taffies
-
-
Going to Everton means he will probably be involved in another relegation scrap unfortunately. Ideally, he would get a move to a top half epl team but sadly he is not at that level yet.
0 -
9 minutes ago, Satoshi said:
Good news is - I'm hanging around less playgrounds.
But I'd be surprised it still is.
I am happy to hear that. But trust me, you are way wide of the mark.
1 -
7 hours ago, Satoshi said:
When I was in primary school saying something was gay was an insult (that I used) kids these days aren't as pig headedly ignorant.
Wow. Which planet have you moved to?
0 -
2 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said:
I'd forgotten that Skipp was injured rather than out on loan.
Hojbjerg and Betancur looked to be a good pairing in midfield. As you say, lots of competition now.
Spurs' recruitment has improved considerably under Conte. He's very astute and utterly ruthless.
Yeh they seem to have everything in place now to push on. Great manager, loads of cash to spend, champions league, cracking stadium etc.
0 -
15 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said:
Sarr, who was signed and then loaned to Metz last summer, is another arrival.
Skipp is back from Norwich too. Not sure they and Winks will fit into Conte's plans if at all. He'll want to sell at least one of them.
If Levy can sell Ndombele, Gil, Lo Celso and Bergwijn, there'll be more money for Conte to strengthen the squad.
Skipp wasn't at Norwich last season. He was in Spurs first team. Lots of competition in that area now. Winks will be first out the door along with the players you mentioned.
0 -
4 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:
Most Courier journalists claiming Jack Ross will be announced as United manager in the next few days.
Be hilarious if he's a disaster as there'll no doubt be a huge fuss made from both sets of supporters.
Well it's certainly getting you all excited over multiple threads
5 -
47 minutes ago, Bogbrush1903 said:
But we didn't need to be one of the Top 13 to qualify for the Play-Offs. We had in our group:
Denmark 11th
...Denmark won at a canter as expected only losing (to us) in their last game having won their previous nine.
But historically we are better than Denmark. That is the main thing here. It all goes in cycles apparently.
0 -
Everton as well if I remember correctly
0 -
1 hour ago, The Derry said:
craigkillie is in the top 5 worst posters on this site. The most condescending nerd ever.
yip - Grade A fanny
2 -
3 minutes ago, Satoshi said:
This is just international football, our domestic game pisses all over theirs - always has and probably always will.
This is the Tartan Army section Pep. We were only discussing international football.
0 -
Denmark have been better than us for 40 years. Hopefully this anomaly corrects itself soon.
2 -
5 minutes ago, SuperSaints1877 said:
Regarding Denmark. Unless I’m mistaken they won a major tournament (Euros) and have managed to go further at a WC than Scotland.
I’d say they are far more successful than Scotland.
Scotland qualified for two WC at the expense of Wales due to two very dodgy penalties.
I think it's probably better to just ignore him. He knows himself he is talking utter pish.
0 -
1 minute ago, craigkillie said:
That wasn't the point you were making when you said "whit?" to a very obviously true statement.My whit was in response to the pointless argument that was being made. This thread is about our standing in Europe. In no shape or form are we in better standing than Denmark. In 150 years of football they have been far more successful despite not even competing professionally until the 80s.
0 -
Just now, craigkillie said:
That's more or less exactly what I said, they were amateurs for over 100 years. So the initial point about Denmark being well behind Scotland for most of international football history is indeed true, and I'm still unclear why you disagreed.
Denmark are a more successful nation than Scotland at international football. That is the only point I am making. You can paint that any way you wish.
0 -
1 minute ago, Jambomo said:
I’m not sure that not having Bale in you squad is really Clarkes fault. Wales haven’t done that much else tbh
Other than keep a clean sheet?
0 -
1 minute ago, betting competition said:
They have been very lucky to be in the lead. Been a bit like the Scotland match with Ukraine the better side and should have had a pen
yeh it's all about the luck
0 -
18 hours ago, craigkillie said:
This is very obviously true, international football has existed for 150 years and Denmark were no-mark amateurs for over 100 of those. They didn't qualify for a World Cup until 1986.
Professional players were banned from playing for Denmark until the 80s. Once this rule changed it's fair to say Denmark have left us in their wake
0 -
Wales have set up much better than Clarke despite having lesser players at their disposal. Get Clarke to f**k
3 -
8 hours ago, Satoshi said:
Denmark for most of footballing history they have been far behind Scotland.
whit?
0 -
Will be interesting to se where he goes from here. Can't see him getting anywhere near the Chelsea first team. Not sure where would be a good place to go on loan. Maybe a top Championship team. He turns 21 next week so needs to get his finger out next season wherever he is.
0 -
Son has won Best Footballer in Asia 7 out of the last 8 years.
0 -
Cmon Arbroath you sexy wee Angus shaggers. Get fired right into these weegie minks.
-1 -
Spurs front 3 are the best in the league. Defence is still a bit weak but going forward they are frightening
0 -
Who is the boy doing the co-commentary on DUTV? boy is 100% pished
1
EPL 2022/23
in Misc Other Fitba Chat
Posted · Edited by Chewing Taffies
Exactly this. Those players mentioned have all been deemed not good enough for Spurs. A Spurs team who finished 13 points ahead of Man Utd. McTominay would not be a starter for any of the teams that finished top 5 last season.