Jump to content

CharlieToogood

Gold Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile Information

  • My Team
    Motherwell
  1. He can hint that I'm having a threesome with Jessica Alba and Rachel Stevens tonight, it wouldn't mean that it's true. These clubs are not a bunch of altruists. They're making decisions based on what's best for them, financially. It's easy for Clyde to say they're taking the moral highground when, as far as they're concerned, they're voting in favour of having two money-spinning ties against Rangers next season. And it's easy for Raith to vote no when, as far as they're concerned, they'd be a candidate for an SPL2 as a result. It's not easy, however, for QoS or Stenny to vote no when they gain nothing from doing so. As for fan power... going on forums and venting frustration by going "that's it, i'm done" means nothing to the clubs. They know full well that crowds will be about the same, no matter what. Fans will still come through the gates. They might complain, they might protest against their chairman, but they'll still pay to do so. The TV deals are what matters most to them - guaranteed money, and it's financially stupid not to aim for the best deal possible. That's why the SPL got formed in the first place.
  2. Why would there be huge opposition from those clubs who'd be set to benefit by joining it? A no vote was always a possibility, so it would be foolish not to plan for that eventuality. That plan is SPL2. SPL2 wouldn't be mooted without sounding out the clubs who'd be required to join. That means some clubs voted 'no' knowing they'd be likely to be invited. I can't believe how easily this is being ignored.
  3. As it looks like SPL2 agreements were already in place (or at least planned out) then it's almost certain that a number of clubs took part in the vote knowing that they would stand to benefit from the creation of an SPL2. If I were a fan of a Division 1 club, right now I would be demanding to know who my chairman has been in contact with over the past week & what the nature of those discussions were. I suspect a resolution 2.5 saying "And we agree that Newco Rangers should be in Division 3" wouldn't have gotten anywhere near 25 votes.
×
×
  • Create New...