scottxs
-
Posts
1,947 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by scottxs
-
-
So who or what is actually in debt the club or the company running the club?
0 -
That's what I thought. You may be obsessed with the Rangers . He's obsessed with you.Yes, mate. I'm definitely the one emerging from that post as a weirdo.
Which 1 is creepier?
0 -
you may have missed 1 of those clubs/companies dying in hilarious fashionLast Bigotfest I watched was the 1980 Scottish Cup Final disgrace.
Never had the inclination since.
What have I missed?
0 -
has the Rangers club/company not been borrowing money from people?Our Old company has paid all its debts.....save the disputed courtcase with HMRC.
Our current company has no debts.
Who do you think we owe?
If it's not loans then are there new shares been released to purchase?
0 -
Not been on this for a while so apart from lots of "off topic pish" what's been happening to the Rangers club/company more has big Dave opened the warchest?
Has sir Craig White or Charles green been found guilty or not yet. ?
And most importantly which posters have been banned for flouting rules ?
0 -
^^^^ owns a delorean type post imo
If he did he could travel back and warn the good rangers men not to trust that evil con man Craig whyte.
0 -
In what possible way is my head gone never mind melted?
Hour after hour, day after day , week after week, year after year there are posters on here and elsewhere who write the same thing over and over and over and over and so on.
^^^^^^^^^^ broken
0 -
I can't imagine walking about with so much hatred inside me. A hatred that drives, what I am assuming is normal average guys, into raging messes who spend hour after hour, day after day , year after year sitting typing the same thing about 'new club', 'yer deid',,'we aren't raging messes. We are laughing at you. Aaaarrrggghhhh laughing I tell ye!!!!'
^^^^^^ heads not just gone but melted.
0 -
those were Chelsea fansThis is what happens when you do what you want.
0 -
-
at least you kept the topic on course. Bennet and such like had deflector shields to maximum .So it's official? Legally a new club and the SFA just made up the continuation malarkey to avoid an armageddon that was never going to happen anyway?
New club it is then.
0 -
I know the Rangers support is a bit slow but why has it taken this long for the club/company to serve notice on the sports direct contract. ?
-1 -
but what about THE COMPANY?Rangers give notice to Sports Direct to end contract.
That has now been completed and the Club has formally given notice to end the relationship with Sports Direct while still reserving our right to proceed with challenges to the existing suite of contracts and side agreements in a court of law.
"For the first time a board of this Club has stood up to the threats of Sports Direct and has achieved resounding success in court proceedings including the substantial recovery of legal costs.
"Sports Direct’s motives were severely exposed when a High Court judge ruled that Sports Direct abused court processes in its attempt to bully the Club and me.
"We will continue to put Rangers first and ensure that we get redress and compensation for the poor commercial and business practices that the Club has been forced to endure."
0 -
your club don't need to spend anywhere near even that. As I said look at the rest of the top division. What club has spent anywhere near a million this season on transfers for a player. ? And how many have made money from selling players. ?Celtic are spending £30M+ I am advocating that we only need to spend around a quarter of that figure, you are not really paying attention.
0 -
you've got a decent manager and he has a magic hat. Plus your admitting to needing a few million £ to compete with Celtic. Look at all the teams in the top division how many spend millions on players.? This sort of we need to spend loads to beat them mentality got you into this mess in the first place now you want the club/company to repeat the same mistakes. Oh well carry on as we sit and laughI reckon with a decent manager £8m per year, so an increase of £2m, given the latest financials that should be achievable.
0 -
you may bring in 5/6 players but will Dave open his wallet to help.I think the part where King says we need to bring in up to 5/6 players in the summer, gives you your answer, thicko.
0 -
but did honest Dave not say he would over spend to compete with Celtic. And that would take millionsWould help if you tried to read the conversation.
The point was that we would not need to spend millions in order to compete in the top flight.
0 -
but will King give him money for those players ?Kings already told Mr Warburton that we need to bring in 5 players next season and the magic hat agrees.
0 -
but we are well run and financially sound as opposed to your club/company.Hearts were pumped by top flight opposition last season while in the championship, yet are sitting in 3rd place in the top flight this season, they have spent virtually nothing.
0 -
So big bad Mike will have to pay court costs of up to £400,000.
That's a good bit to waste.
Why waste several months and that cash on nothing?
0 -
-
the club may have agreed to pay his legal bills but not the company that runs the club.Very quiet on the wall today.
Charles Green has a nerve hasn't he, for wanting Rangers to pay his legal bills if he fails
which could run up to 500k?
The club agreed in 2013 to provide him with legal cover before he left Rangers
So who was it on the Rangers board that agreed and signed these terms of his severance deal with Rangers?
0 -
you can't get a player on £50 a week instalments. Unless your RangersO'Hallorans already gone. Await to see what, if anything, we do with the £500k.
0 -
lets just hope they get paid. Imagine being taken to court for not paying your lawyer.What a gig being the lawyer for Rangers...kerching!
0
Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!
in Celtic v Rangers, Rangers v Celtic
Posted
I agree with most of that except they don't do "walking away"