Claymores
-
Posts
1,402 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Claymores
-
-
I don't even know what that means but you are well out of order here and hopefully won't be here tomorrow.
I mean yoiu are trying to cause trouble for no reason
0 -
You deserve a ban for that. See you later.
You deserve to get a go trying to justify yourself.
0 -
You can't be writing stuff like that, seriously. I'm a bit disappointed that you're getting away with it to be honest.
Annoyed with myself TBH - but the p***k really has been awful
0 -
Certainly seems that way, even the ones named are denying it
Seems strange for the PFA to raise action on behalf of players without consulting them 1st, one could say almost vendictive
Tedsters back - how many players hate you?!
0 -
I really cannot fathom out what Bennett posted that can be taken so far out of context.
Yup - he's a p***k. He's tried abuse on a lot at me in various disguises and "quips" - needs hit, end of story . Good smack in the face will stop his shoite to cancer patients
0 -
The bitch is baiting and provoking him. Not making excuses for Claymore as it was a very lousy thing to say, but if reading both their posts you can see what is going on. Had it not been directed at the bitch i too would have called Claymore on it. If you know the bitch you will know that he himself has history of posting similar to that to members here and deserves no sympathy due to that.
Bennett has been provoking me for a while as he does to other people - I will not take his cancer shoite as I really had that and invite him to my clinic to punch his face
0 -
Is this the post which upset you so much? That was aimed at a lot of people, not you.
bennett, on 10 December 2012 - 22:45, said:The P&Bers appear to have found their balls again, look at them all scurrying out of the woodwork.
You've jumped to the wrong conclusion here, take some time out and reread the posts in question.
I maybe jumped to the wrong conclusion Bennett but I still challenge you to come to Western General with your pishtake which is not nice - get your face pushed in
0 -
Clay, calm down and log off for night mate, you're doing yourself no favours here.
I'm not? You basically said a former cancer sufferer should shut up cos you knew better - you are a complete asshole and I invite to to come and try your shiote @ Western General Hospital Clinical Oncology and see how you get on - your pish is really angering
0 -
Clay when read this again in the morning (once you've sobered up), i'm sure it'll give you the motivation you need to seek help.
Remember it's an illness.
Feck sakes you need a punch from a person at my Clinical Oncology - retract that before I complain - it's just not funny
0 -
The P&Bers appear to have found their balls again, look at them all scurrying out of the woodwork.
Is this you taking the pish again just cos I had testicular cancer and you suck Jardine's balls by posting a really inane and annoying thread which really annoyed cancer sufferers? not nice Benny the ball
0 -
It doesn't matter now that the news has went global.
Is this another world record? 67 players suing must be...............the world breaking Rangers are always tops!!!!!
0 -
Certain players of RFC 2012 plc (Alan McGregor, Kyle Lafferty, Rhys McCabe, Sone Aluko,
Steven Davis, John Fleck, Steven Naismith, Steven Whittaker and Jamie Ness) purported to object to the transfer of their contracts of employment to RFCL pursuant to TUPE. RFCL maintains that these purported objections were incompetent and that the players instead unilaterally terminated
their contracts of employment in an unlawful manner. Arbitration proceedings under Article 99 of the Articles of Association of the SFA were commenced on 5 July 2012 in the name of RFC 2012 plc. Any damages due would be payable to RFCL. RFCL was not a member of the SFA at that time and therefore the reference had to be made by RFC 2012 plc. RFC 2012 plc accepts that it has no financial interest in the outcome. Discussions took place with representatives of some of the players and agreements have now been reached with Steven Davis, John Fleck and Rhys McCabe.
Representatives acting on behalf of the remaining players have challenged RFCL's rights to participate in the process in any capacity given
that it was not a member of the SFA at the time of the alleged breaches of contract and the date of the reference to the SFA under Article 99. A preliminary hearing has been fixed for 7 January 2013
at which these jurisdictional challenges will be determined. If RFCL is successful at this hearing, then the claims against the remaining players will proceed to a full hearing. At this point it is anticipate that such a full hearing will take place in March or April of 2013. Preliminary advice
from senior counsel is that RFCL's prospects of winning these preliminary arguments are good. However, it is not currently possible to quantify these claims in full.
Hi Bairn - I referred to that above - it is basically a statement within the prospectus that they might have income from chasing players. I asked above if Chuckie Cheese will how issue an addendum to the prospectus admitting they are being chased for a helluva lot of money by 67 players.
0 -
Ronnie Esplin@RonnieEsplin PFA refuse to comment on Rangers 67 story. A union not wishing to put forward claims/aims of its members seems strange, on the face of it.
What do your amigos reckon?
0 -
Must have been a fucking MASSIVE squad to blow a huge lead in the SPL and lose their last EVER games against us, home and away, then....
Makes you wonder how they were always "injury-ravaged", to be honest...
f**k the SPL, f**k The SFL, the diddies and plastics, they could form their OWN league!
Seriously, Bennett, what do you expect them to say? Given your lot's penchant for "having a word", and all?
I'm confused - 67 players couldn't win the SPL under Sal's expert management???
0 -
Well, words would be a start......
I cannot wait to find out how this is a good thing for the Tribute Act - the Party Line seems to be taking a bit longer than normal to filter through, mind.
Hiya, Bennett! You've got a mate now. Let's hope those bad boys stop pointing and laughing now. I wouldn't hold your breath, mind...
I seriously thought Benny the Ball could have been ploughing the party line by now (67 are plastic tarriers obviously who need send nail bombs) . Tedi will give us more info, etc etc etc
0 -
Definitely off the wagon again.
Shame that.
Is that your response to the situation prat?
0 -
Seriously what is wrong with you?
We believe you are a complete p***k who never can answer any Sevco shockeroonies
0 -
Calm doon lads - Bendarroch will come back and teach us it is all OK. BZ Bear will give us words of wisdom
0 -
Are you oot your nut on buckie again Norman?
That makes no sense at all, now calm down and compose yourself a bit.
I can't even go ^^^^^^^ Seething - 67 Benny the Ball
0 -
Justice for the Sevco 67!!!
We are all the 67
:D :D0 -
Where the frig is BZ Bear to give his informed view?
0 -
When the currants return to the thread, it will be in a cluster, or is it a bunch?
What time does the Lodge finish????
they're awaiting Swallow Swallow guidance of how to portray 67 former players making a claim against the scum is really ok - await!!!!!!
0 -
:lol: :lol: We always knew there would be days like this so kept the faith...................No8. bombing out of Chuckie's plan and 67 former players taking a class action against the scum.
Score:
0 -
Where is Tedi when you need him to to inform us about the 67 class action? 3 extra going further - Sevco are hilarious
0
:D 
:lol:
Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!
in Celtic v Rangers, Rangers v Celtic
Posted
Look above and see why I legitimately complainaed of your abuse twice kid!