madeirabhoy
Gold Members-
Posts
67 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Celtic Rebel. started following madeirabhoy
-
madeirabhoy started following Celtic Rebel.
-
omg you are right! i didnt realise that people couldnt be involved with a football club and the football authorities! i thought all people involved with the SFA and SPL couldnt have been involved with a club before! like campbell ogilvie, and gordon smith and lex gold and fraser wishart, and scotland managers like walter smith and alex mcleish oh wait....
-
Lenny tries but he's a mere amateur compared to sally lenny complains about lying referees, sally stirs up threats against disciplinary tribunals lenny points his finger angrily, sally accuses the whole world of being against his poor innocent team lenny doesnt think referees should give bad decisions against his team, sally doesnt think football associations should punish his club for cheating for 10 years lenny phones his misses and is angry down the phone, sally drags his wife through a car park by her hair
-
i think he's brilliant. the shittest SPL manager since John Barnes. so far he's: turned a 12 point lead into a 10 point deficit managed to go out of 4 cup competitions having got through one round beating Arbroath.... signed Ortiz, Mcckay and Celik act more unprofessionally than any manager in SPL history 'we demand to know who they are....they arent wholly responsible for our demise but...' i hope the rffffffffffff use their cash to give him a 10 year contract coz even if he stays a decade, his biggest success will still be patsy kensit and his only 'win' will have been the fight with his wife in the car park
-
so what should the other clubs have done? slipped you debt free into the SPL just because you have a big fan base? not punished you just because you, along with us, are the two big teams? does that mean you are immune to the sport's laws? and the lawyers say you have a case to answer over the dual contracts. since the actual issue is quite simple (whilst the pouring through exactly how much you did it is long and complicated) its fair to assume, since this is a message board not a court of law, that theres a good chance youve done wrong. it is really as simple as - if you played a player who was receiving contractual payments not lodged with the SFA, then the game has to be forfeited. of course im happy to wait for the decision of an independent tribunal, but its sevco who are fighting to have the enquiry dropped. why is that? if you think you are innocent you'd want to prove it surely. tell me, what should have happened? what punishments should you have got and what league should you be in and what should happen with the dual contracts investigation?
-
i keep reading shite like this . what exactly is wrong with the other scottish clubs wanting rangers to be sufficiently punished for their many crimes, whilst not wanting to lose a fortune in income due to losses that arent their fault but are directly the fault of rangers? how is that incompatible with sporting integrity?