Jump to content

Mad Capsule

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,296
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Mad Capsule

  1. I think part of the argument is whether or not The Rangers could be voted into SPL and Rangers got a vote on it. So in sense Rangers were voting for or against a different company, which exists today as Rangers/The Rangers/SevCo. I could be wrong though. Can anyone shed some more light on this?
  2. I agree with you. SevCo are a completely different entity from Rangers. And SevCo are currently playing in SFL3.
  3. Well, see below. Although I and indeed Bairnforever1992 could be wrong with dates. Do you know when this process is to begin?
  4. Oh no, sorry, I don't think I worded my response very well, so I apologise for that. I totally agree with your point, but Enron shut down. Done, dusted, no more. People moved their energy requirements to other companies. Every accepts that they are gone. The difference with Rangers is that at the moment, we all know that they are no longer in business and due to be liquidated. To everyone - bar the Rangers fans - they are SevCo, a new and separate entity. We know this, and perhaps deep down, Rangers fans know this and I think they might be scared of what will happen in the next five days. My point is that, for arguments sake, lets say Rangers were found guilty of everything, Charles Green runs off with the money, Ibrox is sold off and the land bulldozed into a Tesco megastore. Rangers (already dead) and SevCo (soon to be dead) will have nowhere to play football and thus cease to exist. What I mean is that Rangers fans simply will not go support another team. A scenario that may happen is that they will follow another smaller junior division team, or indeed a wealthy Rangers fan will found another company a year after SevCo is shut down and the above has happened with Ibrox. They will buy players, call the company SevCo 2, play at a different stadium, but the fans will still refer to them as Rangers. Perhaps I'm not being too clear in what I mean, as I am new poster, so perhaps my ability to put my meanings into words on this forum are not quite up to speed yet, but whilst Rangers have ceased to exist to everyone on here, they never will to Rangers fans and their blindness. In a way, you have to respect their loyalty. Or to be more accurate, you would respect their loyalty if they hadn't cheated for years, bought Scottish football into disrepute, had disgraceful fans, looked down their noses at fans of other clubs, asked who were your big team, and so on.
  5. I can see his point about Enron to be honest. People can go elsewhere for their energy, but Rangers fans will not go anywhere else for their football. Which makes this whole case and the outcome all the more interesting.
  6. I have seen this line from SevCo fans so many times in this thread I am beginning to think that if someone typed 54 and counting into the search function, it might cause the website to crash. This is a poor rebuttal and I'm sick of seeing it. Get as much use out of it as you can for the next 5 days.
×
×
  • Create New...