johnnyc13

James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman 2m2 minutes ago Brown says if you wanted to buy George Herriots FP (a rugby club in Edinburgh) you would just have to buy the assets.

‏@jamesdoleman Brown now quoting from Rangers incorporation document from 1889. Notes it says "takeover the assets" bit does not mention "club"

rant Russell ‏@STVGrant 3m3 minutes ago Lord Doherty says it is clear Rangers started out as an unincorporated association. CG lawyer appears to have a copy of the original Rangers articles of association to hand. CG lawyer: From 1872 until 1899, articles of association show Rangers the club was unincorporated.

James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman 48s49 seconds ago Brown asks "what does the rest of the world outside football think what a club is." Judge "club can be used in a number of ways" James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman 8s9 seconds ago Judge says that the "articles of association show Ranger started is a club" Brown replies this changed when incorporated, Brown "A club can not sign contracts"

doleman Brown asks "what does the rest of the world outside football think what a club is." Judge "club can be used in a number of ways"

sdoleman Brown now moves on to "the vexed question of the mythical concept of the club"

That was sevco, rangers had a licence... It's all very confusing

@jamesdoleman Breaking:The same lawyer acted for Charles Green as acted for Andy Coulson court told.

@jamesdoleman Brown, RIFC are acting: "as if the criminal case is some frolic unrelated to his [Green's] duties."

On the continued proceedings we are unable to receive via twitter @jamesdoleman Lots of shaking of heads and whispering from the RIFC table at this section of evidence.

Think he's fooked that up, tweet deleted

Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 2m2 minutes ago CG lawyer: What Sevco bought was a club, stadium, assets etc without right to play football in this country. That was a gamble.

@jamesdoleman Brown: that while the assets of Rangers had been purchased for £6.75m they had later been valued at over £20m, this, Brown says could lead to the risk the transaction would be challenged.

James Doleman ‏@jamesdoleman 3m3 minutes ago Parties in Charles Green vs Rangers International football club called back into court Ding ding

Have not stopped laughing all day... The ***s are going bust, the ***s are going bust, you're hardly gonna believe us The ***s are going bust.... AGAIN

Dignity

Its more beneficial for the zombies to pay Chuckles bills...It's beautiful in every way

Mr Wolffe, Mr Green, Mr Whyte, Mr Brown....Reservoir ***s

"Assets" and "Acquired"

@jamesdoleman Brown cites the Coulson case to reject the idea that the issue of costs rested on a judgment about the strength of the defendants case. Brown says he will "come back to the whole Rangers Football club issue in some detail." Brown says Charles Green "acquired the assets of Rangers for Sevco Scotland, which holds them to this day." OOOOOOOOOFT.....

15 minutes ago RIFC itself replied that it was the same club, highlighting it was a recognisable identity able to be operated and owned. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 15m15 minutes ago RIFC: There are comments from Charles Green himself that he was referring to "the club". Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 15m15 minutes ago Lord Doherty: there are two arguments. It could be that the club is a club; or that it is a limited company Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 15m15 minutes ago Lord Doherty says Rangers response to complaint over "most successful club" was not a letter of admission. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 15m15 minutes ago Lord Doherty asks whether the club v company debate is one he can deal with without evidence. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 35m35 minutes ago RIFC: Approaching words used in correct context, indemnity only should run from June 2012 at point of acquisition. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 36m36 minutes ago RIFC: It does not follow that the club should indemnify CG for alleged actions for when he was merely director of Sevco Scotland. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 38m38 minutes ago In the clause, what did the parties mean by chief executive of Rangers FC? CG only became that at point of acquisition of club by Sevco Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 41m41 minutes ago Point of club v company debate to draw clear dates in timeline when Green was chairman of "club" and chair of "company". Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 43m43 minutes ago RIFC: It is an association football club which has a continued existence, regardless of entities which come to own it from time to time. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 44m44 minutes ago Lord Doherty: "How would you define the club in legal terms?" Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 44m44 minutes ago Lord Doherty counters that you can't have a contact with "The Rangers Football Club". Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 45m45 minutes ago RIFC now arguing that Sevco Scotland "acquired The Rangers Football Club", which it owns and operates. Making club v company distinction. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 48m48 minutes ago Debate continuing on liability of RIFC to pay, with regards to the nature of several of the charges. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1h1 hour ago RIFC: Company being asked to give indemnity which has consequence of paying fees for actions unrelated to interests of the company Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1h1 hour ago "If it was intended for the clause to cover such a circumstance, one would expect it to be put in such clear language." Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1h1 hour ago Relevant clause in Green's "compromise agreement" is 8.3. Indemnity to pay "any reasonable legal costs" arising. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 1h1 hour ago Rangers' lawyer suggests to Lord Doherty to consider that the dates of some charges may pre-date Green's contract and the relevant clause Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 2h2 hours ago Rangers' lawyer advancing argument for case to be suspended until after criminal proceedings. Grant Russell ‏@STVGrant 2h2 hours ago Live tweeting is permitted from the Green v Rangers case but Lord Doherty reminds of contempt of court order currently in place.

I couldn't care less about dots mate, it's a great way of gauging how upset that wee fanny tedi is, especially when he has to activate one of alias accounts too.. He makes it so easy to spot his other accounts, weirdo

That's The_Arsehole

Tedi has not been on the Big Thread all day but has found time to red dot two of my post in the premiership forum from yesterday... I must of upset him, Tedi the wee shitebag is hurting bad Cheating Scum

sum-meisters