rhliston

Only after the Trust Board called for an EGM of the Shareholders WC Boggs. Before that he had refused to call for a meeting of the Shareholders for a number of years. Is that not correct WC Boggs. ?

So your not going to name the person concerned WC Boggs. Are you a coward WC Boggs, I ask you please name the person concerned for a second time. You are quite happy to come on this forum and post your responses on it but when challenged to back your responses you refuse. How very cowardly of you WC Boggs.

I have posted a response to WC Boggs asking him to name the person concerned, we shall see if he responds with the name of the person concerned.

Not only did Stuart Brown and John Daly refuse to meet with the Trust Board but they refused to meet as well with the owners of the Club The Supporters Trust who own 83% of the Shares in Stirling Albion Football Club.

Who are you talking about WC Boggs please name names ?

We shall see what happens don`t count you chickens just yet. just responding to your post regarding the Sponsors, remember that.

The Trust Boards resigns if my resolution fails Why would the Trust Board resign if my resolution fails its nothing to do with them is it. ? Talking nonsense man. Regarding the Shareholders meeting, Stuart Brown asked that details of the meeting not be leaked, that`s why Shareholders refuse to give any information. I`m surprised you did not know that, clearly you are under orders from your master to cause trouble.

It was explained at the informal meeting on Tuesday night that the reason no date for the AGM has been set yet was due to the fact that after the resolutions to remove all the Trust Board were received it was felt giving a date was pointless as the Trust Board might not be in place. Surprised that you did not know that. What Trust Boards Plan to remove the Club Board at the Shareholders Meeting. ? Again surprised you did not know that. You are not too well informed about what is happening are you, thought your master would have told you that.

it just keeps on going.

Really, so what do you call the gang of 74 silly and failed attempt to remove the entire Trust Board then. ?

Or you are forced to respond to the misinformation put out by WC Boggs.

Adam Cummins resigns for next season for the Albion.

Wrong on checking the list of members of the Trust who supported the resolution to remove the entire Trust Board your name is listed as supporting the removal of all Trust Board members on it.

True but I only wanted to remove 2 Directors, Stuart Brown and John Daly not the entire Club Board as in the case of the gang of 74.

They don`t have anyone to replace the current Trust Board members, that`s where their little Plan falls down. As stated by Stuart Brown at the shareholders meeting its a tit for tat for the Trust Board calling for an EGM of the Shareholders.

its already been explained in previous posts, I suggest you go back and read them again.

Wrong the Club Board is accountable to its Shareholders. Stirling Albion FC are a Private Limited Company. The Supporters Trust are the major Shareholder in the Club owning 83% of the Shares. The Supporters Trust Board are accountable to its members. "if people are going to say the club board has in any way refused to be accountable it needs specifics on instances supplied, not just repeating the words not accountable! Can you tell me then why Stuart Brown and John Daly refused to attend a meeting with the Trust Board unless a Trust Director Ian Doyle was not present. ? Does that not suggest that. ? If you check the resolution submitted to remove the entire Trust Board, you will find the names of every Club Director are on these resolutions, some to be fair have only asked for the removal of 3 of the Trust Board members.

Once more, more twisting of the facts. Let me ask you a question then WC BOGGS if the person did NOT vote 50 times, are you saying the Trust Board lied to its members by saying this. Indeed it was stated on Tuesday night at the meeting that a Trust Board member phoned the person concerned and asked him about the voting, his response was " all 71 coaches are in the room with me" This was stated at the meeting or are you saying that the Trust Board member is lying. ?

Good question come on WC BOGGS lets see you answer.

More facts being twisted. The fact is I know who was behind my resolutions to remove Stuart Brown and John Daly, ME no one else WC BOGGS. Can the same be said for the resolutions proposed by the Gang of 74 ? don`t think so. Their is an old saying You can fool all the people some of the time but not all the people all of the time.

My My so I am that twisted you clearly cannot see the wood for the tree`s WC BOGS or your real name is Hugh Hanlon is it not. The facts I have posted are accurate and no amount of twisting them to suit the agenda from your master can disguise the facts. Yes as members they are allowed to vote,, but as it states in the Trust Constitution "one person one vote " NOT one person 50 votes. No amount of twisting the facts on your posts will alter the fact that the Trust Board were right to intervene in this matter, it is up to them to decide what to do. If the members are not happy with their decisions they have at least the option to vote them out. Unlike the Club Board who appear to be unaccountable to anybody including the owners of the Club the Supporters Trust.

The Trust Board is ACCOUNTABLE TO THE MEMBERS, unlike Stuart Brown and Co, they put themselves up for election. If the members are not happy with them they can be voted off. Again unlike Stuart Brown and Co who seem to think that they are untouchable and have used every trick in the book to stay in power, from the Personal Statement from Colin Rowley published on the Club Website, to a failed attempt too remove the Trust Board without any reasons given. The attempt to rig the voting for the AGM by one of the Clubs Directors, Not to mention the continued decline of this Club on the playing field under the stewardmanship of Stuart Brown. We had the situation in which Stuart Brown and John Daly refused to meet with the Trust Board unless one of its elected members was not present, how can this be allowed to happen. The Trust are the owners of the Club and the fact the both men refused to meet with the owners clearly is a very worrying sign. For far too long this situation has been allowed to develop and I for one am glad that the Trust Board have decided to take action to make sure that owners of the club The Supporters Trust regain control of what they OWN.

Indeed it was stated by Stuart Brown that the attempt to remove the entire Trust Board was Tit for Tat for the Trust Board calling for an EGM at the Shareholders meeting on Monday night. If that does not suggest Stuart Brown knew what was going on and indeed signed 3 of the resolutions backing them then I don`t know what else anyone could think.