Jump to content

Cardinal Richelieu

Global Moderators
  • Posts

    11,169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Posts posted by Cardinal Richelieu

  1. 2 hours ago, Quentin Prankett said:

    Hi QP here,

    Glad Si won especially when it went 9-9; if he lost that from 8-5 in round 1 after the capitulation last year, it could have caused psychological problems for his career going forward. I've watched some videos on YouTube about psychology so I know what I'm talking about.

    Thanks for your insight QP 😀

  2. 2 minutes ago, forameus said:

    I don't want to say the process is besieged by bots and scalpers, but...

    I for one welcome our new overlords

    Chortle. I'm sure a lot of people will be joining just to find out prices and see if they can split the tickets etc, but even if only 1/4 of people, you'd have to assume they'd be buying 4 tickets. 

    I'd have been a lot further up the queue if Ticketmaster hadn't decided now would be the time to run some extra security checks on my account. 

  3. 26 minutes ago, SlipperyP said:

    It's a readable biography examining centuries of myths, half-truths and lies.

    Half way through and it's staggering how much we don't know about him,  more staggering is the bullshit that people make up about him 'under research'.

    I started reading it yesterday. The same day he was born, St Georges day.  Well actually we don't know that, we do know he was christened on 26th April, so why not make his birthday the same as St George's Day, excellent.

    Unfortunately in 1564 England had the Julian calendar, meaning he was born on the 3rd May😂

     

     

    Funnily enough, I'm reading a book about the Julian Calendar (and the history of timekeeping in general). It's quite good, although getting a wee bit bogged down in the mechanics of a water clock for my liking. 

  4. Does anyone know if this is the only sale there'll be? I know you have to buy both tickets as one, so I'm quite willing to dinghy Smackdown if it's on at the same time, unless they were to put it on earlier. Does anyone know if that's likely?

     

  5. 14 minutes ago, welldaft said:

    Nobody was debating anyone’s gender or sexuality. I correctly pointed out that would and should not be tolerated, so why should the other stuff be allowed especially naming actual individuals. Should you not take a dim view on that ? 

    I'd say bringing up gender / sexuality in the first place, then posting a picture of someone eating popcorn, is the very epitome of starting of debate. 

    Anyway, back to the football. 

  6. Shame they couldn't have brought back Moxley / Ambrose for a brief appearance. Obviously he's at a rival promotion, but  a wee bit of quid prod quo and having a similarly statured WWE person appear on an AEW show would be great business for both companies, and reinforce the fact that the old perv really is no longer in charge. 

  7. Just now, welldaft said:

    I 100% agree this is a football forum. That is why I am here. 

    But if I may suggest that you want to remove political posts, perhaps (just a thought) you should remove the post/s a couple of pages back that started all this sh1t ? 

    I don't think there's anything wrong with mentioning a board member's particular leanings in the context of a thread about that particular club. It's only when people start debating other political issues (such as gender and sexuality) that the thread is in danger of getting diverted. We don't want to delete stuff more than necessary. 

  8. Personally, I can't stand Cody Rhodes. His dyed hair, that fucking tattoo, his voice. I was pleased that he won cos it was quite the spectacle and a change was needed, but hopefully he's just a temporary titleholder until they can put the title on someone else. Maybe Gunther :wub:

×
×
  • Create New...