-
Posts
107 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Everything posted by On our way back
-
please provide an example of a CEO that hasn't got the skills of a Politician, and the ability to constantly assure his shareholders that all is well?It isn't in his interest to publicly shout "we're fucked, but we're going to carry on". Particularly during the 120 day period, where he might actually be drumming up business, despite your constant assurances that the club is fucked. Making statements like that would be worse than any of the bull dust you've spouted on here, and that's saying something.
-
Lest ye forget, that was when a whole team of spivs and shysters, known for their ability to skim fortunes, were allowed to do so. I said before, and I maintain - I think we'll get out of this by the skin of our teeth. We've borrowed against future income but remember the 120 day period isn't up yet. FWIW, and I don't care if I get the delusional Orc patter here - what I think will happen is that despite the tears and snotters to come, the wages budget will be hammered over the Summer, and more aligned to income. I think we'll still be in a fair bit of debt, but I think we'll scrape through. We have to believe and trust in Wallace - he appears to be the first business man to try to cut costs, and much as it pains me to say this, we really need to cut costs or die a horrible death.
-
DhenBhoy doesn't have a defence. Nor do you. The assumption that all Rangers fans are stupid - which is what I believe you are asserting - is complete hogwash. I know that your preconceptions are the norm, but they are untrue. I repeat. DhenBhoy has no defence. Being one of theirs, I understand his stance. To a point. He's not one of US, obviously......
-
Maybe if you would elaborate on your somewhat simplistic comment, I could rubbish it. As it stands, you have provided me with nothing to work on. Trust me when I tell you that, when you provide something more substantial than "Hmmmmm", I will find something to rubbish. Unless, of course, you have something tangible to discuss, in which case, I will discuss that with you. Based on your previous comments on here, I have two theories: 1. You are a decent poster, who can offer excellent debate. 2. Unless it's a Sevconian you are in debate with, in which case it turns to abuse. Quid pro quo.