Maxsta

No i've not at all. His criminality doesn't influence him owning Rangers. It's charachter assasination, you can care about him as a person all you want. I wasn't saying "why would anyone care" so please don't try and make it seem like something it's not. The gang mentality in here is a bit nerdy for my liking.

Just f**k off you tedious wankshaft. Read the last few pages, i've been speaking about what this thread is here for. Putting across points and my theories. Tedious shite patter to get greenies like yours is what brings this thread down. If my views, posts are really that shit then reply to them and destroy them point by point, if they're that poor they shouldn't be hard to argue against now otherwise f**k off to a different thread where you can feel good about yourself posting shite patter.

He doesn't want to spunk money away on us and he doesn't have to once he has ownership.

Irrelevant. King's a Rangers fan who's already invested money in us before. Far too simple to put them in the same bracket. Whyte's a conman, King's a dodgy businessman.

"Says he supports Rangers" Give me some reasons why King, the Rangers fan would do a runner with cash?

Yeah, if you've not got anything worth saying you should try a different thread maybe?

It's always nice when you spend time typing out replies to receive copy and paste jobs. Keep up the good work! (you know what do to next)

Possible, just my opinions buddy. I think they'll sell up after the renewal period. In 2 weeks time King will be majority shareholder.

Counting not your strong point? whyte was a conman, dave king is a bad man who supports Rangers, moronic to compare them.

Dave King wouldn't mind picking up the club for pennies cheaper but that's not going to happen as the spivs will be gone before that could happen. The board have legal duties, they don't want administration, that's the timmy wet dream. They want profit, pure and simple, it's easier for them to run with what they have and sell up. The board must look after shareholder interest, it's their legal duty. We'd only go into admin if we owed people money, if the board know King is willing to invest under a share issue then there's no reason for them to run out of money.

It does. Rich people involved in football haven't made their money from window cleaning now have they. I couldn't care less about Kings SA tax issues unless it effected my club which it won't. Equally i couldn't care less if the owner of Starbucks kills kittens and puts them in the coffee because i don't drink coffee... To all those that scoff at Dave King and see him as a "crook" what do you think he intends to do with Rangers that would make a Rangers fan concerned? Why does it matter how he made his money when he's a Rangers fan willing to use it on the club. Why would i actually be bothered? Logically now...

Unfortunately no, hard to be so rich without picking up some dodgy baggage. Why would there be an insolvency event in the first place? People need to stop focusing their thoughts around us going into admin, it won't happen.

You're right. They're backing down though as shown from yesterdays developments. King's winning the slow game of chess.

Yawn. All signs point towards it.

Can't say i know anything about her, used it as everyone "knows" she was a good bitch.

Dave King. It's not as complicated as a lot of people are trying to make out.

Dave King. Why on earth does their need to be any insolvency event? What's funny about King buying, they're after as much money as possible, they know they're a busted flush, best to leave now with what they can take, probably get a fair whack more after last nights meeting too.

Aye it's strange. Why do you think he showed bravery out of interest as far as i can see he was diagnosed with terminal cancer then died. I dunno, i'm not having a go at the boy, fair play for raising the cash but i couldn't care less if he's died or not, it was terminal cancer, hardly mother Theresa, unless as a society we are claiming money makes you a better person? Plenty of people have raised more for charitable causes. If he's a special case because he raised a lot of money then where's the hype for rich folk donating money. Also some people look at rich people donating money as a "Well they should be doing that when they have all that money..!" type nonsense which if that's the case then why is this boy a "hero" for raising money and the already rich folk aren't? He exploited the "share culture" we have going on right now, not a bad thing utilising attention seeking smartphone mongo's to share his story and raise money right enough but it doesn't make him any better than cancer sufferers who just ended up dying. I genuinley think some people are surprised he's dead because they never even knew the story, they just mindlessly shared to get brownie points and to be seen to be doing a good thing. It's like say if Nike did a huge advertising campaign, a smart one at that, they donate thousands of pounds annually (i'm assuming) but don't get lauded as hero's. Having terminal cancer doesn't make you a hero, neither does raising a lot of money, be it for selfless reasons or not. IMO.

As has been said the spivs know the game is up and are on the run. There won't be another insolvency event, there won't be a sale/leaseback scenario happening at all.

I've seen plenty of people surprised that the boy raising money for cancer is now dead. "Can't believe wee Stephen is dead!" Really?

I red dot shit posts. Stop hyping up.

w**k

I wish i was you. What can i say.

I was just trying to wind you up. If you want to be a frilly unicorn with the neck of a giraffe then you are.

Just because you never realised this doesn't mean the people that matter didn't.