Jump to content

SweeperDee

Gold Members
  • Posts

    9,150
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by SweeperDee

  1. If that’s the case, how was he interfering with play?
  2. Missed this cracker. You clearly are at it. The goalkeeper was closer to the ball as it was coming into the box, could have jumped, punched it, or whatever else. If you think a raised arm could have stopped a professional goalie from jumping out to it, I don’t know what else to say to you.
  3. No answer will be given from those who somehow think it wasn’t a monumental f**k up.
  4. He wasn’t in the goalies line of sight, didn’t even attempt to go for the goalie or the ball; he raised an arm while jostling. That is not interference.
  5. Is he the invisible man all of a sudden? Where are Hendry’s legs? Can you even see him? The only player you see is the Spanish one. If Hendry was offside, you’d see a part of him past the last defender, but you don’t, so once again you are talking absolute horsehockey.
  6. Cause he had no fucking way of saving it. Fair fucks if Hendry pushed the goalie into the net but he barely brushed him with his pinky and that somehow constitutes a foul? Sounds legit.
  7. The goalkeeper could have rammed right through Hendry if he had the slighest chance of saving it, and would have got a foul for him as a bonus. Hendry was not fouling him in any way shape or form, and if anyone thinks he did, they should just give up on Football now.
  8. NOOOO YOU CAN’T RAISE AN ARM NEAR A GOALKEEPER IT’S A CLEAR FOUL!1!1!1!1
  9. Aye, offside my fucking ballsack. Cheating c***s.
  10. How on earth is he interfering with play? Explain it.
  11. It’s not even a foul ffs. There was nothing there at all. If it’s a foul, then what for? And if it was offside, there was no involvement or impediment from Hendry. Both scenarios don’t hold up to scrutiny at all.
  12. Nah mate, it’s offside don’t you know? Hendry spat in the goalies eyes and did jumping jacks in front of him.
  13. Oh yeah, cause every ref in the history of football is above reproach in that regards. Especially when Spain are involved.
  14. Can’t believe some folk can’t wrap their head around the fact that maybe, just maybe, there has been ANOTHER complete balls up from every official on that pitch tonight. So much so it really does smack of some real dodgy behaviour.
  15. You clearly don’t know what constitutes interference means in that situation.
  16. Yes; but then what for? Hendry does nothing to foul the keeper. If you think a raised arm constitutes a foul, think you should go watch Basketball instead.
  17. Ah yes, Skyline will still say that’s the signal for offside right enough. Jesus wept.
  18. What interference? Genuinely, how did he interfere with the play?
  19. Don’t even bother. Boy doesn’t have a clue.
  20. Are we seriously debating whether the ref signalled for a free kick or offside? It’s clear as day it was for a free kick, and once again I am asking, what was the free kick given for?
×
×
  • Create New...