Jump to content

chimneyman

Gold Members
  • Posts

    209
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chimneyman

  1. I wouldn't wish to cycle astride a Cumbernauld man with poor chat and fitness levels.    

    I go to Cumbernauld to practice my roundabouts, in a fucking car.   

    I occasionally drive from our brand spanking new house in one of our 3 cars and have a drive out of Cumbernauld. Sometimes I'll strap my £3K bike to one of the cars

    Why do you need to practice roundabouts? You fucking idiot!

    How's things going at your mum's?

  2. Anyone in the Cumbernauld area want to arrange a ride?

    I'm a lapsed cyclist, but have started riding a route up Slamannan way. I'm only managing to get out every couple of weeks and need some motivation. Midweek evenings or Saturday / Sunday mornings would suit if anyone's interested.

    Cheers.

  3. Perhaps if you were bright enough to read then you could have extracted them yourself, obviously not.

    '1st team squad wages stated to be £6.5m'

    At this point their were 26 players in the first team squad, 250k per player £4808 per week

    You were wrong.

    You finally got round to reading last year's accounts? Good for you, Tedi. That's how informed the typical bigot is. 6 months behind the curve.

    So you don't question the other £8 million?

    And also you don't question another bigot when he states your turnover as almost half of the actual figure?

    Tell me this, why would the typical bigot be so institutionally ingrained as to lie about turnover?

    Thats a rhetorical question, by the way. I hope the irony is not lost on you.

  4. Wrong

    Come on Tedi. Give us the correct figures and you'll win this one. Go on, this is a tap-in for you. I've given you an open goal to shoot at. Even a thick bigot can't miss this one!!

    The figures, please!

    I'll give you some help. Read this - http://www.therangersstandard.co.uk/index.php/articles/current-affairs/332-rangers-2014-accounts-analysed

  5. Then you should have made that point and used a quote to back it up, instead you said 'pish' followed by a statement that merely claimed he still did business with the SA government, you then edited the post to add in the link to the other article without quoting anything from it.

    Was this the same corrupt SA government advised SA businesses on how to follow tax efficient schemes and then proceeded to prosecute the same businesses for it?

    You quoted the post with 2 links. Did you not read the post you quoted? I was mocking the presumption by the Record journalist that King somehow had approval from the SA government. He fucking doesn't.

    We all know Dave King is corrupt to the core, just a few Orcs are in complete and utter denial.

    Mon the Hibs!

  6. I am not sure how you can declare them as 'pish' either to be fair, not unless you have an inside scoop which shows that King`s company does not continue to do business with the SA government.

    Missing the point completely.

    He does do business with the government - not disputed.

    It's also not disputed that corruption in SA is absolutely massive. So the fact that some parts of the government 'endorse' King doesn't really lend much credibility to his status as a trustworthy businessman.

    Get it now?

    King = Still disgraced.

  7. Pretty laughable stuff in the Record this morning, particularly the stuff about Ashley.

    Wonder how much of this pish was drip-fed by King himself

    "Indeed, most of King’s business is done with the South African government and if he was so disgraced in his adopted homeland they would be unlikely to grant him the bulk of his work with Micromega Holdings, which oversees areas such as IT, procurement, recruitment and financial services."

    http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/gary-ralstons-take-rangers-mike-5729446

    https://www.thetrumpet.com/article/11050.32600.159.0/society/south-africa-where-corruption-rape-and-murder-are-normal

  8. Notable btw that long-time SNP voter and not-at-all Labour drone chose a tear-stained response to that innocuous post; better luck next time eh.

    Still riddled with cliche and not much else.

    Anyway, the original point was the complete and utter double standard applied to politicians behaviour, depending on which party they belonged to.

    That why I called them 'fans' and likened the mindset to that regularly displayed on Rangers Media.

    But obviously some grown men, probably also balding and a bit bloated, can't handle their new favourite political party being criticised a little. Why is that?

  9. Btw it must be an absolute beamer to start posting as a Labour drone the first week after their party has been absolutely obliterated in Scotland by the only show in town.

    We're truly through the looking glass here.

    alex-salmond-pink-433911.jpg

    What a cliche-ridden post that is! I'm pretty sure you also used the 'looking glass' line a few days back.

    SNP voter since 2003, btw.

    Grown men getting their knickers in a twist because someone said something negative about their new favourite politicians. Pitiful, that.

  10. But was unelectable as the leader of an independent Scotland, the ref decided that. Wee Nicky is a different proposition, I don't like her stance on most things but at least she is a politician of personal conviction, not personal ambition imo.

    A lot of the new SNP fans don't know, or care, about their history.

    They think the SNP were just formed for the referendum.

×
×
  • Create New...