chimneyman
-
Posts
209 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by chimneyman
-
-
Went along for an induction last night, despite having been using the gym for a few weeks already. Anyway, got talked into booking some PT sessions, which is probably what I need to give me a bit of kick up the erse.
Otherwise I'd probably spend the next 6 weeks on the cardio machines then give up out of sheer boredom
0 -
You, the flute band loving, anti Scottish, Sevco supporting, plastic Northern Irishman, are also a great advert for 'loyal unionists' (
) in this country too Boab. RRM
0 -
There's really no reasoning with someone that deluded.
0 -
Erm...I did didn't you read it? Do you think Japanese people who don't live in Scotland have a right to tell us what we're allowed to think of our own country too? Are their opinions relevant?
People have a right to say what they want. Doesn't mean their opinions are relevant.
If you're saying people don't have a right to post opinions on the Internet, particularly considering the total pish you post, then you need to seriously consider how messed up your logic is.
0 -
Nobody suggested that, but people who aren't Scottish and don't live in Scotland have no right to come on here every day telling Scottish people who live in Scotland what they can and can't think about Scotland. I wonder if he does that with France or the USA.
Who said he has no right, and how is that rule to be implemented? If he has no right, then what's going to happen to him? Are you going to fine him or report him to the council?
I think you should type up a wee notice and serve him with a fine. It's the only way he'll learn.
0 -
Everything to do with our country, and when its about our country you don't actually have any right to comment at all actually. Though being a raging Britnat you can't help yourself.
Are we going to ban foreigners talking about Scotland?
Are you ok, ***?
0 -
Can anyone recommend a pair of trainers for the gym? Don't plan on doing lifting at the moment, so various weight machines, bit of cardio and some HIIT-type classes. Looking for something more appropriate than a pair of Gazelles.
0 -
Can anyone quote a Bennet post that actually contributed something to the thread?
0 -
What was Angus saying to that bint about voting and not presidential system. ..missed that
Do you use the bint word because you disagree with her?
0 -
Without Trident his brother will have no reason to visit Helenburgh leaving it looking like a ghost town
You mean some people in Helensburgh might move and work / live elsewhere?
0 -
Piers said something about his brother being in the forces, which he thought somehow made his opinion on Trident more relevant
0 -
My argument involves taking no money from anyone at all. Try to understand this please, because it's pretty central.Instead, it divides such money as is collected between the clubs that everyone turned up to watch in a sporting contest.My view is actually the straightforward, obvious one. That it plainly baffles you does not alter this.
It's hardly baffling, your proposal is exceedingly simple.
You want Rangers and Celtic to have less money so your team can have more money. You want to benefit from the financial rewards that sectarianism brings the big two.
I completely understand why you are not keen to accept this is central your whole proposal.
There is no central fund that can be divided up, so stop kidding yourself on.
0 -
I don't wish to be reliant on the OF at all.
You're proposal involves taking money from the big teams and sharing it more equally with the wee teams.
The big teams are Celtic and Rangers, so that circle doesn't quite square.
Only an idiot would argue that isn't the case.
0 -
Not a solution, but an improvement based on fairness.Thanks for the sociological lesson though.
It's not based on fairness, it's based on some arbitrary nonsense you dreamt up on your lunch break.
I've got no idea why you want your team to be more reliant on the old firm, and to profit from their sectarianism. Thought the idea was for wee teams to be self-sufficient.
It's weird logic.
-1 -
Sevco... More fans = More cnuts.
They are, but you still want them to finance your club.
0 -
I am vague on the costs of staging a match, but it's not an insurmountable hurdle when cup tie gates are divided, so I fail to see why that would be more troublesome in the League. So in your view, the fact that a club has more fans means they should be able to make much much more money, even though these big clubs are utterly dependent on the others in order to stage matches and create the meaningful contexts that are our competitions.Go the whole hog - allow the big teams to field fourteen players. That would help recognise the revenue they bring.
If you're splitting revenue 50 / 50 then the big teams still get much more money, so you're not really providing a solution to anything.
But yeah, more fans = more money. That's pretty much how society works.
0 -
I think we'd all feel better if you apologised for each and every one of your posts. That one at the top there just seems insufficient.
Still can't do the maths.
0 -
Not good enough.What do you mean by "bring more to the table"?
More revenue, silly.
Why don't you define the costs of staging a match?
They only ideas you've come up with so far can all be categorised as vague and without substance.
0 -
I think if you do the maths, you'll find the ugly sisters owe Scotland a f**k ton more than we owe them. Feel free to use use your fingers for counting rather than typing.
You can't do the maths yourself, and you mock me for using fingers for counting? Guess you don't do irony, eh.
0 -
What about that principle you've devised?Please do explain it.
I didn't devise anything, it's already established fact.
0 -
You do know the phrase "costs of staging a match" is completely and utterly subjective?
You want to recognise the principle that if two teams don't show then no one shows. What about the principle that one team brings a lot more to the table than the other? Let's ignore that one.
This thread has gone rank. Apologies for adding to it.
0 -
That's pretty much impossible though isn't it? If your daily intake of calories was negative you'd struggle to get out of bed in the morning?
I thought the idea was to do cardio which burns fat and eat enough to keep yourself nourished without going over the 2500 calories per day
Do you think people just keel over and die if they're a few hundred calories short??
You create a calorie deficit and the body uses fat stores to provide energy.
There's a reason humans can survive weeks or months without food.
0 -
I'm 41 and if I lived off a teaspoon of water a day I'd still put on weight. It's fucking ridiculous. At the end of the day your genes won't be stopped.
Most people gain weight because they're not honest with themselves.
0 -
It really didn't. And how much of said fortune has he invested in rangers 2012?
I was mocking him, not lauding his 'wealth'!
Must start using smilies
0
) in this country too Boab. 
Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!
in Celtic v Rangers, Rangers v Celtic
Posted
They can't really go on the pitch and score the goals for them, people would notice.