Jump to content

Old Bing

Platinum Members
  • Posts

    3,566
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Old Bing

  1. I'd need to look at that one again, but from memory no. If that count was long fair enough. There's no way it stretched to the piss taking that went on for AJ.
  2. I'd need to look at that one again, but from memory no. If that count was long fair enough. There's no way it stretched to the piss taking that went on for AJ.
  3. It's just like when top level players go to America. They can't cut it at the higher level anymore. So they drop down a few levels plus get more money. With no pressure or expectations. And play in front of people who don't understand football. Good luck Michael, enjoy your retirement
  4. On the last knock down, from joshua hitting the deck to the ref stopping it is roughly 25secs! The count is delayed by about 5 seconds at the start to send ruiz away when he's already far enough away and heading back to his corner. Eddie Hearn may as well just referee the rematch himself.
  5. Analysis of a boxing match requires one to look deeper than just the fact that someone has been punched m8. Not if your looking for a reason for signs of concussion. Which was specifically what we we referring to. I've a few previous posts on the fight if you want to read what I thought overall.
  6. Yeah something very strange indeed, it was as if he was acting like he just got punched on the side of the head.
  7. I think more accurately, people are saying he was an over hyped media creation. Not shite, just nowhere near as good as he was made out to be. Many people have been pointing out the ways he will lose for quite some time. So it's not sudden at all. Perhaps a change of trainer and strategy plus losing alot of bulk and he might come back stronger. Fair play if he does. Can't see it tho
  8. Joshua has gotten worse since the Vlad fight. Never improved footwork, head movement, defence. Muscle bound and blowing out his arse at the end of round 1! Thought it would have taken fury to really expose him tho. Fair play to ruiz I honestly think if during the Parker joshua fight if the referee hadn't stopped Parker every time they got close he could prob have clocked him too. Someone said it earlier, joshuas been exposed now. He's done at the top level. I'd fancy ruiz to put in the hours and do him again.
  9. Don't usually get involved in this But ha ha Falkirk, ha ha Justice is done ⚖ Hope you stick with your snake now
  10. What makes you think that? Just cos there's a few ex ton players there? I'd find it very hard to believe mckinnon has come in and is having his team dictated by hawke
  11. Bah, he's still a dick tho
  12. Agreed, but just for clarity I was correct :-) I wouldn't have bothered pointing out the mistake to anyone else
  13. Poor effort at trying to claim whoosh :-) Desperate stuff You are infact just wrong pep
  14. Where you at the games counting? I asked for the stats? FYI http://www.soccerbase.com/players/player.sd?player_id=65077 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Gauld https://www.foxsports.com/soccer/ryan-gauld-player-stats
  15. Erm clown.... Actually it's 2, if you would post a link to your 5 games for sporting stat that would be great. Any online stat database has the figure at 2. Perhaps you are getting mixed up with the 5 games he played for vitoria setubal last season. These would not count as games for either sporting Lisbon or cd Aves as all 3 are infact different clubs. You can tell this without to much research as the club's have different names.
  16. Erm... Clown It's quite clear he means appearances for the sporting Lisbon team. 2 sub appearances is correct. For CD Aves this season it's actually 18 rather than 20 games. Of which 15 were coming off the bench.
  17. No, he's just a very naughty boy
  18. It was obvious when robertson was just starting to get a game for Queens Park?
  19. I wouldn't describe them as fans tbh Remove the s, add another "n" and a "ys"
  20. Yawn, as if I read what you write. Quite long tho. You should have just posted a picture of ainsley
  21. Rubbish, as well you know. You and your wee gang are rounding on anyone and everyone 24/7. So what category do I fall under in your head? A stalker or fluffer of stalkers? Bearing in mind I have just condemned the blog stuff in a previous post. And have never posted anything at all to do with this 69 shite.
×
×
  • Create New...