Jump to content

ThirdrockfromtheSon

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by ThirdrockfromtheSon

  1. I think it is actually a duplicate point. Green was spitting tacks about this last week, saying something about the fact that if reconstruction comes around, he would have to look elsewhere outside Scotland for an alternative - IMHO trying to get to play in England, but at God knows what level. The 30-40% increase, I believe, is over a number of years, and not just in one year. I think it's about 10-15% per annum. I think that this might also be part of the reason that he went Tonto last week. Amongst other things, his ability to push the ST costs through the roof was restricted somewhat when he realised he would probably be in a similar league next year. Reconstruction might save the Bears getting ripped off for once. That can't be a bad thing for the Supporters, for a change.
  2. Why? You're in the Third. We won that a few years ago. It's nice to win a title in the Third but all it does is get you out of the lower echelons of the Leagues and give you a warm feeling for a wee while. So, why is it going to top them all?
  3. Well, if it stops the "54 titles and counting " cr@p from some of your contempoaries on here, I'd be delighted. "53 and a 1/2 titles and couning" doesn't have the same ring, does it? I guess we'll just have to be content with our pioneering performances all those years ago - won't happen again, I'm afraid. Oh, and a happy new year to you.
  4. You quoted this straight from "Only and Excuse", didn't you? That reads like a Jonathon Watson/Tony Roper special !!
  5. 2 observations, Bennett: 1. Well done to you for going to support your team - fair dues. 2. To stop all this Club/Company rubbish, why don't we all morph the two words into one word - "Clumpany"? I think that would stop a lot of tit-for -tat shite on here, no?
  6. But you haven't got 54 titles, you shared one with us in 1890/91. In fact, if goal difference had been taken into account back then, you'd only have 53, not 53 and a half. So up <U>ye</U>, ya c**t..
  7. These are my thoughts, just a little twist on what you're saying....
  8. Agreed. We're here on the merit of winning the playoffs, not by being the best, or second best team. But we are here simply because of the process. So, get yourself some bricks, concrete and maybe some metal, go build a bridge and get over it.
  9. It hurts me to say this, as you are usually a pretty decent poster: today, you really are depriving a village of it's idiot
  10. That's a robust statement and a very good question you raised there. It wouldn't be beyond the realms of the imagination for Charles Green to consider that option. After all, he and Whyte are both crooks businessmen and I would imagine that most crooks businessmen would have taken the liquidation route anyway (Miller and possibly Ng had that route in mind also) as it appears it would be the least expensive/most profitable route for them to take.
  11. Please don't try and big yourselves up - your team and their journey in the lower league(s) is no consideration of ours. We're having a bad season, no doubt. But we now have a new Manager, who you might remember from Rangers' better years. Hopefully he can guide us to 9th position and the play-offs, or even one spot better for survival in Division One. We might not necessarily get relegated this season. And Rangers might not necessarily get promoted either.
  12. Fair enough, I stand corrected. It just seemed a huge coincidence, and I had no hard proof to offer to the BRALT Court, just circumstancial evidence.
  13. There was a David Leggat in court the other day for possession of hundreds of thousands of improper images of children.................could there be a connection between that story and this lunatic, or is my imagination just in overdrive? Sorry, can't post a link as I saw the story on Freeview teletext.
  14. I could think of better places in which to spend your birthday - P&B isn't one of them. Happy birthday when it arrives.
  15. You got me then. I was trying hard not to swear! Spel how you lyke, I was just board at wurk and your post got pikced for misstakez. One hour to freedome ........ :( :huh:
  16. Yes, it was a great year. The Sons of the Rock were formed. Not 1873, or 1899, or 1903 or July 2012.......just 1872.
  17. Back to school, son - it's disprove ....ach, feckit, there'sre too many poor spellers out there. to single you out....Education? Pfft!!
×
×
  • Create New...