Jump to content

RR #1

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,077
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by RR #1

  1. 15 minutes ago, Grant228 said:

    I appreciate this will sound mental, but If the clubs aim is to get promoted to the premiership then relegation today might not be the worst thing in the long term, seems to happen fairly often that teams coming up from league one will take that momentum to then challenge in the playoffs of the championship, 

    Aye like yer pals at Falkirk have done? Enjoy your stay 🤣 

  2. 11 minutes ago, McGuigan1978 said:

    Eh? Surely it does the opposite? She's given a little overview of what goes on that presumably none of us know?

    Don't see how? If a CEO isn't involved with FOOTBALL matters at a FOOTBALL club I'm completely baffled, maybe that's just me but I don't think so. 

  3. 2 minutes ago, McGuigan1978 said:

    Why?

    Because of the danger that it leads to folk getting slagged off when we really don't know their background as you said yourself. 

    Writing on twitter that our small time football club's CEO has nothing to do with football contracts isn't going to get a positive response is it?

     

  4. 4 minutes ago, McGuigan1978 said:

    I do think this is quite interesting, and I'm a little confused at the two opinions which seem to be gathering around the CEO. They seem broadly to be in two camps;

    A) Boo, why is Karen involved with anything when her man is the assistant manager, this is clearly a conflict of interest, booo  and;

    B) Boo, why did she not get involved when her man is leaving, he's the assistant manager, she should have spoke to him, booo, etc

    Now, I'm not saying the situation is ideal, far from it, but those two opinions don't really marry up, and Laura's tweet is interesting, and also suggests that there's a danger that we start slagging folk off when we don't really know the background. 

    Then maybe this Laura shouldnt be firing off tweets like that in the first place. 

  5. 2 hours ago, Double Jack D said:

    Some proper knicker wetting going on in here.

    McGlynn is a well backed manager who has just recorded one of our worst half season runs in recent memory and chucked the best part of £150k at signing which has tore the club apart.

    If he's willing to go to Falkirk, an absolute shambles of a club in the league below,  for a wee bit extra dough then good fucking riddance.

    Rovers man my arse.

    Agree with this though think a lot of the 'knicker wetting' is due to the talk of McPake taking over rather than McGlynn leaving. 

    If McGlynn turns down a new contract to leave for Falkirk then f**k him and good riddance with a bit of luck he'll take his rapist striker with him. 

  6. Well that was the most pathetic performance I've ever seen us put in, in a derby. We've maybe lost by bigger scorelines but Dunfermline have never had an easier 90 minutes than that against us. Can't even remember a one shot at goal or a single time where we even caused the dunfermline defence the slightest bit of trouble. The team is soft as shit and has no fight in them. The managers team  selection was bizarre and after hearing his post match comments I think he has completely lost the plot. I'll not be bothering with anymore of that pish this season.

  7. 2 hours ago, Grant228 said:

    There's a sliding scale in football with regards to just what football fans will put up with, in regards to how good they are at football stuff. 

     

    If John McGlynn had the record of Locke, Smith or Yogi it would've been a convenient excuse for him to be ushered out the door, is it is he's still stinking out the Scottish championship, brilliant. 

    That makes perfect sense eh? 😂 ya slavering fud. 

    Cardleismagic and you absolutely love talking about the rapist it seems. We all know your views on the matter as you've been all over the Rovers thread for months. Give it a rest and talk about the match ffs. 

×
×
  • Create New...