Jump to content

JamesM82

Gold Members
  • Posts

    997
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by JamesM82

  1. 2 hours ago, Molotov said:

    If Hibs and Bournemouth both qualify for the same European competition would there be any issues if the clubs were drawn against each other?

    There is a lengthy article on this as it’s a quite common issue given the number of teams working like this.

    https://www.farrer.co.uk/news-and-insights/multi-club-ownership-in-football-a-summer-of-discontent/#:~:text=The rise of multi-club ownership&text=The benefits are clear.,with player transfers and loans.
     

    It depends on how much the management and control of the two clubs are integrated. UEFA set some rules in place after Red Bull started buying multiple clubs. They changed their structures after those rules were brought in, so UEFA allowed RB Leipzig and  RB Salzburg to play in the same group (which I think Celtic were also in).

  2. 2 minutes ago, VincentGuerin said:

    You've missed my point. People will always see this differently, it just depends how you see the world. f**k me, Newcastle fans have got on board with the fucking Saudi government, so football fans will always do the necessary mental gymnastics.

    But even if Hearts were successful, it wouldn't be worth it to me. The club would be diminished.

    It depends on the details, doesn't it? I could see your point if Hibs just become a de facto Bournemouth reserve team, whose primary purpose is developing younger players for them. But I don't think that's what they have in mind.

  3. 12 hours ago, VincentGuerin said:

    It certainly damaged the club's reputation.

    This is different, however. This is an undeniable change in Hibernian's role as a club. You now exist for the benefit of another club.

    That's simply undeniable. You're third choice in a chain.

    I'd imagine away from the bravado of the online world there will be Hibs fans horrified when the reality sets in.

    I'm sure that Girona fans are "horrified" at being somewhere beneath Man City in their chain. They're top of La Liga and just scudded Barca 4-2. I'm also sure that Union SG fans are "horrified" at being somewhere beneath Brighton in Tony Bloom's priorities. They're top of the Belgian league and are playing Liverpool tomorrow night.

    Of course, there are also examples of "feeder" clubs doing badly (e.g. Troyes got relegated last year), but it's hardly a death sentence. I've never been a big fan of multi-club ownership, but the reality is that it's here to stay and FIFA / UEFA aren't going to get rid of it. Why should we be the luddites? 

  4. 18 hours ago, Tommy Tappin said:

    Huge number of updated filings made by Hibs to companies house today, presumably ahead of the Foley investment being green lit on Thursday. 

    Looking at Companies House, I'm not sure the filings yesterday (12 December) are directly related to Foley. All the documents are revisions to "Confirmation Statements" from 2016 to 2022. I think I read recently that Hibs had noticed some discrepancies in their share register and would have to correct them. Presumably this is them updating the public record having made those corrections.

    I asked someone who should know about these things and he says these corrections are a necessary "tidying up" ahead of the Foley investment, so there is perhaps an indirect connection. 

    https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC005323/filing-history

    image.png.708701fb115e9d495f1232092e3775b9.png

  5. 1 hour ago, 2426255 said:

    Will you take any confidence from beating Northern Ireland going into Euro-2024?

    It'll be interesting to hear the reasoning from Clarke/Maxwell given the direct contradiction to what had been stated previously. Our opponents, a pot-5 team and a team going to the Euro's, suggest to me the SFA choice was restricted in some way.

    https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/steve-clarke-test-scotland-best-31487320

      Hide contents

     

    I think they would say though that NI have been higher than that recently (e.g. qualified for 2016, lost in playoffs for 2018 and 2020). It's only since Covid that they've fallen off (badly). Those earlier results mean that their FIFA ranking is still decent(ish) - they're ranked above Israel and Georgia. Also, a game against them will be "competitive" in the sense of club teammates / rivals wanting to prove a point against each other.

  6. On 08/12/2023 at 20:10, Hoose Rice said:

    Melks away official for over £1m. 

    Norwegian media is saying it's a record fee for Stromsgodset, but are claiming that it's less than £1m (13 million Norwegian krone). IIRC there were similar "arguments" with Millwall in the summer about how much they paid for Nisbet. I guess that means there are add-ons (appearances, etc.) within the fee(s) Hibs are claiming. Whether that's fair or not depends on how realistic they are.

    image.png.577d3c93fc81d428813197e467b6641e.png

  7. Hibs Observer (Partick McPartlin) is reporting this, but from the angle that Hibs are open to selling Melkersen rather than saying it's agreed. Suspect that the £1 million thing is Hibs opening position in a negotiation and they'll haggle down to (say) £700k. IIRC they paid a decent whack for him (£400k?).

     

  8. Saw this on the bird app. It doesn't really cohere because the traditional Dutch shape is 4-3-3, so you would drop one of the mids (Wijnaldum) and play their most capped RB (moving Daley Blind to CB).

    I think for Scotland this would be something like (5-3-2):

    GK Leighton (91)

    DF Dailly (67), Weir (69), McLeish (77), Boyd (72), Robertson (67)

    MF Fletcher (80), McStay (76), McGinn (62)

    FW Dalglish (102), Miller (69)

    That's without forcing in a second GK (Gordon, 74) or yet another CB (Willie Miller, 65). I know Christian Dailly never really played as a RB - he sometimes played as a LWB for Scotland (!) - but I think it's the best fit without going too nuts. Does show though how some of the current players are starting to get up there in cap totals.

     

  9. TBH the players have been far too exercised about trivial stuff that shouldn't concern them, e.g. how tickets at Hampden are sold. The whole thing needs a total reset. Starting with a new coach - get in someone who has done a good job with a similar NT (that worked before when they got Signeul) - and take the games out of Hampden until they can consistently attract >15,000 crowds. 

  10. 18 hours ago, deadasdillinger said:

    Listening to Scottish Football Podcast earlier who were going through Hungary and Switzerlands recently results. 

    Hungary qualified well, but didn't really meet anyone of note. Their recent big victory was 4-0 at home to England, which is obviously excellent. Otherwise the rest of their results came against so called easier sides. 

    Switzerland's results in the last year or so are really nothing special. 

    Switzerland's recent results are a lot worse than nothing special. Their association had to give the manager a vote of confidence after qualification was secured! I suspect they're a team that has been good for a long time, but appears to be on the way down now because a lot of their better players are the wrong side of 30.

    https://www.football.ch/sfv/nationalteams/a-team/news/mit-murat-yakin-als-nationaltrainer-an-die-em-2024.aspx

    image.thumb.png.040c160e99ea7e53d4f6921458351cf5.png

    Hungary are kind of the opposite. They were pish for even longer than we were, but have improved recently and have some good younger players (most obviously Szoboszlai).

  11. 9 hours ago, DrewDon said:

    If it is not a "meaningful stat", then why do so many elite level managers and players pay attention to it and reference it? It is not the be all and end all, of course, but it seems to be the most useful tool we have for understanding the quality of chances a team is creating and receiving. 

    It's only useful over a long time horizon, at least 10 games. Stuff that happens in an individual game has too big an influence to make it particularly useful in that game by itself.

    e.g. Norway had much better xG than Scotland in the Euro qualifying group, but nobody (in their right mind) would claim that Norway "deserved" to qualify.

  12. 2 hours ago, Donathan said:

    Perhaps I’m overthinking it here but for situations like this can you ask someone to come along to Germany with the team to be part of the dressing room and an extra body on the training pitch but not officially be part of the squad or eligible to play in matches? Almost like an honorary coach. 

    Craig Brown took along a handful of youth players to the 1998 World Cup for that purpose. Laddies who were nowhere near getting picked for the actual squad, but were happy to tag along and make up numbers in training games, etc. 

    https://www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/sport/football/2300497/kieran-mcanespies-france-98-story-mr-browns-hamper-boy-who-was-responsible-for-an-iconic-scotland-goal-celebration/

×
×
  • Create New...