Blame Me
-
Posts
1,138 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Blame Me
-
-
1 hour ago, Roboccop said:
I understand Burrell was offered a contract extension earlier in the year but his agent refused to discuss it then. I suspect he has been courted by other clubs.
I think this is closer to the truth than some fallout with McGlynn or huff.
He came here to put himself in the shop window and if he's had interest from elsewhere then he's succeeded.
Its also possible he wants a return south and clubs there have a possible interest so he'd rather try his luck earning a deal in England than stay with us where he won't be 1st choice, far from home.
Interesting to see where he turns up.
1 -
47 minutes ago, RC55 FFC said:
... including some of those still signed on but we can’t keep churning squads every summer. That said, we need a far better starting X1 with most that we are retaining, being on the bench/squad players next season.
Agree.
You can see from the squad photo at the beginning of this season gone how we have got to where we are - A miss-mash of M&M, Holt/Sheerin, Rennie and early McGlynn signings highlighting the various strategies the club has followed depending on which way the wind was blowing.
The short-termism and pivot to long-termism i.e. Brad McKay has created such an imbalance that we need to find a comfortable, middle-ground.
0 -
2 hours ago, Springfield said:
We don’t need a squad of more than twenty players for L1, but I’ve no doubt when whatever happens we will have these numbers. We need to think quality over quantity. I’ve watched teams like Airdrie work with a much smaller squad, (and no doubt a smaller budget) with some youth given the chance.
Interested if you could expand on how many players you think we had this season just past that you would define as "first team"?
0 -
17 minutes ago, ebobsboy said:
I'm actually dreading that. Because I think McGlynn will keep his favourites and let the likes of Burrell, Lawal, go. Basically anyone with a hint of talent goes and plodders like Oliver will get kept. The fact he gave Nesbitt a two year deal should be your starter for ten. Gives you the absolute fear.
Has it been forgotten that the players also have a choice in this.
Certain circumstances not in the public domain may dictate why players go.
The release list is just that. It doesn't infer anything about the reasons behind who is and isn't on the list realistically.
1 -
9 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:
I find it odd when people bought after that season and are “threatening” not to buy now ...
I can understand it, now.
Have fans become fatigued by constant messaging of giving managers better budgets with ever more cash being ploughed in in the hope it could only get better and it didn't overall?
Folk being scunnered coinciding with renewal time is a tough sell but I'll remain optimistic it won't dip too far.
0 -
37 is no age at all for a 'keeper and I don't think having an older head in the squad would be such a bad thing next year if I'm honest.
1 -
21 minutes ago, Springfield said:
Did the announcement of Nesbitt’s two year deal wind up other players ?
We'll come to regret the new deal if only because for the duration people will post how terrible he is
.
He's no world-beater granted but he's not as bad as some make out.
4 -
42 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:
How is my name associated with that quote?
Can only assume I quoted the OP from your quote of theirs and it's misattributed it to you.
If it's any consolation I agree with your view on the original post.
0 -
2 hours ago, Back Post Misses said:
The team is a disgrace. the manager is fucking clueless and the board need to understand it is not acceptable
Wildest take I've seen and that's going some this week!
0 -
17 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said:
...
McKay, Mackie, Watson, McGinn, Donaldson, Henderson, Oliver, Morrison, Nesbitt (even at 26), are all now on the way down. There is no energy in our squad.
...
Can't agree with your assessment of some on that list.
Those I agree on are McKay, who has shown repeatedly he's not going to cut-it and I've got no qualms with letting Oliver and Morrison go.
Watson and McGinn have something to offer short-term and Mackie, Henderson and Nesbitt have plenty of energy if allied with the potential shown - predominantly by Yeats - and what we've seen of Lawal if he stays.
In losing our wingers I'd opt for playing narrower and look at getting a foil for Allan rather than replacing Kennedy or Morrisons width.
I actually prefer Nesbitt in a wider role than centrally.
0 -
44 minutes ago, bairn88 said:
My worry is with his and our obsession with a “squad”. Look at Airdrie, Dunfermline, Partick. Small first eleven that had the quality to turn it on and go on a run. I fear we’re spunking too much on the middling bunch to really punch our way to any success
Coming to the conclusion we should try a challenging financial budget and remove the favourites millstone from our necks and see where that takes us.
For me, it takes the pressure off everyone and the BOD can set a public goal of anywhere between 1st-4th. As we've seen in seasons past, comparatively smaller teams in 2nd-4th spots have gotten similar or better outcomes without being tagged as failures or big expectations.
Get a tight-knit, unfancied but ambitious squad to a championship and it's a greater feat.
-1 -
Going over old ground again but the idea of "digging deeper" to fund, what some quarters would have you believe, one of - if not - the biggest budget in L1 is going to be a stretch regardless of who's in charge.
Misunderstood by many - which has possibly led to the claim above - is the "football budget" encompasses not only the 1st team but all of the others we have or plan to have.
As alluded to in the podcast I mentioned, we have immediately taken the 400K hit by staying in L1 next year albeit mitigated by this seasons cup run and whatever play-off monies we get.
I think the inherent flaw in the model of creating a "sustainable" club is that initiatives like FSS or FF are unsustainable whilst it appears that the money isn't making a jot of difference to our outcomes!
That's not a slight on those schemes btw but eventually, like ST, people will begin to question where the money goes IF vast improvement doesn't materialise when compared to clubs run on a fraction of our budget and support seem to live within their means (at least from the outside) while making us look mediocre at best.
Airdrie a great example: Competing on a seemingly modest budget, operating a winning youth side; having a transient fanbase and no sugar-daddy. I'm sure Airdrie fans/someone will be along to put me right soon enough if none of that's accurate.
I posted a while back about the possible ST pricing and latter announcement and floated a figure which was an inflationary increase + FSS sub combined and posters baulked at that. However, in essence that is what we're being asked to do whoever leads the team.
Thanks if you made it this far!
4 -
17 minutes ago, Van_damage said:
...
As you say though it could be a step too far if it means a specific number of players to maintain though. Would be good to hear more detail on it anyway.
12 minutes ago, PedroMoutinho said:...
Presumably there will be a cost impact in terms of additional coaches etc as well as a bigger playing squad.
Imo the under 18 and under 16 sides are the right balance for league 1.
If you haven't listened already it's covered in the Falkirk FC podcast with KJ and KG from a few months ago.
Listened back today and it's quite interesting now that we know it's another season of L1 we'll look forward to and what the implications outlined then would be if that were the case.
0 -
37 minutes ago, Springfield said:
Would good to hear something from the BOD following the season end.
It's Sunday. Club staff are allowed a day off.
News will be announced this week, if not even tomorrow.
0 -
38 minutes ago, FalkirkBairn2021 said:
That would be a good narrative if we'd started really slowly and finished like a train once he got to recruit more.
It's not true though. This is 1000% his squad, he's been massively backed to recruit it and we're worse than we were in January imo.
It feels very much today - and has been building for weeks - like many posters are looking for any negatives to justify sacking the management.
Stats, signings, tactics, interviews etc.
This last few weeks have been disappointing and frustrating but we haven't been good enough.
We can go through signings 'til the cows come home but many weren't expected to play as much (Lawal, Yeats, Carroll, Burrell) and others were learning the game (Rowe, Wright, Alegria - recalled when he was beginning to make a difference, Meekison - who promptly got injured).
A lot of ifs, buts and maybes and the squad fell short but to rip it up and start again with no guarantees that it'd work.
1 -
16 minutes ago, Dunning1874 said:
It's already extremely shaky ground for McGlynn to go down the road of "we can only do so much with the budget that we have" while comfortably outspending some Championship clubs, especially if he's going for the argument that he inherited too many under contract players when McPake had that problem to a much greater extent at Dunfermline and could do far less to his squad.
If you're planning to use that as your deflection from a humiliating end to the season though, you should probably avoid giving Aidan Nesbitt another two year deal first. 'We inherited too much shite in this squad, also I'm offering that shite new contracts' isn't going get anyone off his back.
If I wanted to read another "McPake the Messiah" post I'd dip into the Dunfermline thread, thanks
Comparing a squad who've just came down vs. one who had spent 3 years at this level is not the same.
Both budgets may have been comparable but suggesting that the quality was like-for-like is apples and oranges stuff really.
Likewise, it can also be possible that some players who were already under contract can get new deals as there is no rule that says he has to ship everyone out. You'd be on here berating him for signing a whole new squad, if he achieved the same outcome, had he been able to do so
.
He may be circumspect over the closed-season and I hope he learns from this as it's been a chastening experience but fed up of the bad takes and told-you-so's from others right now.
1 -
1 hour ago, Harry Kinnear said:
...
with Coll Donaldson to blame, there is no need for him to go for the ball as McKay had it covered
The exact opposite I'm afraid.
McKay was under the ball and is falling away from it with his jump but ignoring that Coll clearly shouted when the cross came in that he was going to head it - it was clear as day in the KM stand.
McKay didn't have to jump - he caused the collision and is the one squarely to blame.
Run it back and the throw-in comes from McKay initially doing his usual of shanking a clearance!
If we're going to waste money on pay-offs I'd rather use it on his contract.
1 -
6 minutes ago, Ranaldo Bairn said:
Question: who should I contact regarding an operational matter at today's game? Nothing football related.
Best guess -
1 -
4 minutes ago, FFC 1876 said:
Kai Kennedy has much better offers than us on the table.
I thought he was hit-and-miss (no pun intended) and not sure I'd keep him or Morrison now, given the choice.
2 -
4 minutes ago, Hartleys18/19Army said:
I also hate reading other fans talk about weaker leagues and next season will be our time. We are established league 1 now, let's keep quiet and see where the season takes us.
Agreed.
A key takeaway from the interview, regardless of what you think of it, is McGlynn himself is under no illusions that only going up as champions will do.
The momentum he alludes to needs to be there from the off next season.
0 -
I know it's easy tonight to decry everyone and everything but thought PJ did well today.
No chance with the calamitous defending from his central defensive pair at the goal but felt, some kicking apart, he merited starting today.
2 -
24 minutes ago, unused sub said:
Today's tactical master stroke was to have Donaldson hit high diagonal balls for Henderson to knock down into the Airdrie box and hope someone gets on the end of it. Henderson lost nearly all of these ariel duels unfortunately.
I thought it was a masterstroke as he won them. Just a shame there wasn't anyone to get on the end of them ...
0 -
Airdrie didn't have to do very much today and probably knew they just had to wait for our customary f**k-ups.
Our style of play was a carbon copy of Tuesday.
Wingers who can't cross, trying to hit one or more strikers who aren't going to win high balls and a midfield who don't like to break beyond the lines.
Add to that a defence who can't defend and you can see why we lost 7-2 overall.
Max was a standout until he went off - likely the effects of his earlier headknock - and I know I'll be in the minority but I'll credit Nesbitt as he gave us impetus along with Lawal.
Morrison and Kennedy flattered again and I do wonder why they are resistant to driving into the box these days and seem to start over when they got a sniff of the box.
If Lawal isn't on the retained list it'll be a travesty.
3 -
1 minute ago, Rugster said:
It’s only half time. Could easily be 10-2 at full time.
With added on time it'll be about that
0
The Falkirk FC Thread
in Scottish League 1 General Chatter
Posted
Having finally caught up with the Falkirk Daft podcast I think we can expect to see Mackie, Henderson and Donaldson as part of any preferred defensive lineup.
I've a gut feeling McKay will be offloaded like Hetherington eventually was once the midfield deficiencies are addressed, allowing Henderson to move back.
I think if we can get a settled defensive unit in place and avoid the, at times, enforced changes for Williamson we might have a base to build from.
McCann unfortunately becomes the conundrum again. Not good enough to start but too good to sit on our bench.